Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 乔菲的朋友圈

Channel

乔菲的朋友圈

@qfdpyqv2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003970440909
TypeChannel
Username@qfdpyqv2
Created5 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 October 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/qfdpyqv2

Growth

768 Oct 2026, 18:48 — 76 subscribers8 Oct 2026, 19:22 — 76 subscribers8 Oct 2026, 18:488 Oct 2026, 19:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–77 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 19:2276no change
8 Oct 2026, 18:4876first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
450.1%
avg views ÷ 76 subscribers
Avg views / post
342
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.386%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held18 (5 October 2026 – 8 October 2026)
Views total5,473
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Videos
2
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Oct 2026, 15:16 UTC57 viewsread 8 October 2026

杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://telegram.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】:#超级好评 【优势】夹子音 瘦 嫩 配合度高 【不足】胸不大 嫩妹服务 床响容易出戏 【出击时间】:10月8日 【老师花名】:#乔菲@qfainv 【出击留名】:meteor Pisces 【开课位置】:西溪 【修车水费】:工兵P 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 没要 ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照评价】:人照8.5 美白去掉 【身材评价】:165左右吧 身上无赘肉 屁股肉肉的无纹身 【胸部评价】:小胸-忽略不计。 【鲍鱼评价】:(正常毛量,水一般,偏紧) 【服务评价】:(属于嫩妹服务不是贴心服务) 【态度评价】:(无罚站 态度还行 ) 【环境评价】:(课室干净,一次性浴巾有) 【过程描述】: #流程细节: 看见老师的工兵 还有名额 简单看了一下 感觉还行 于是报名出击 本来…

8 Oct 2026, 10:54 UTC141 viewsread 8 October 2026

杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://telegram.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】:#好评 【优势】 嫩 【不足】床比较响 【出击时间】:10月8日 【老师花名】:#乔菲 @qfainv 【出击留名】:秋 【开课位置】:西溪路 【修车水费】:工兵 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照评价】:人照相似度 8分 素颜 【身材评价】:身材不错 全身没有赘肉 【胸部评价】:A 【鲍鱼评价】:正常毛量偏紧 【服务评价】:三件套 【态度评价】:态度不错 【环境评价】:课室环境还可以 【过程描述】: #流程细节: 看到有个工兵直接报名,和老师约了时间,准时到达,见面看到老师身材不错,穿的黑丝,腿比较白,脸部素颜,然后给了水费,直接洗澡,老师帮着洗了一下然后擦干,在床上主动问舌吻,个人不喜欢就没要,然后老师去舔咪咪,舔了一会开始口下面,口了一…

8 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC166 viewsread 8 October 2026

#杭州肯德基 https://t.me/kdjqjt #好评 80-100 【出击时间】:10.08 【出击老师】:#乔菲 【联系方式】:@qfainv 【出击留名】:钓鱼很难 【开课位置】:余杭 【修车水费】:工兵P 【人照评分满分10】:9(频道里面生活照的那张去掉美白) 【颜值评分满分20】:18(颜值还是可以的健康肤色 ) 【身材评分满分10】:9(健康肤色加身材非常好。瘦但是有屁股这个没得说) 【吊感评分满分20】:18(湿度有点欠缺。紧度可以。我正常尺寸表示还可以) 【服务评分满分10】:9(嫩妹里面算不错。就是持久力不行) 【态度评分满分20】:19(态度挺好 爱笑的但是前提你得主动点,妹妹开始有点慢热你得主动 ) 【环境评分满分10】:9(应该算公寓环境还可以) 【综合评分满分100】:91(以上相加) 情绪价值描述:声音好听。需要你主动点。正常聊天的感觉不错的。挺爱笑的,还是那句话前提你主动点。有点被动 【过…

8 Oct 2026, 04:13 UTC178 viewsread 8 October 2026

繁花报告模板:https://t.me/HZFHLYQ 【优势】 【劣势】 【妹子花名】:#乔菲 【联系方式】:@qfainv 【妹子年龄】:18 【验证留名】:西瓜 【验证时间】:10月8日 【上课费用】:1p 【颜值】:人照相似9成,跟课表照片一样 【身材】:165左右,胸有B 皮肤白皙紧致,完全没有一丝赘肉的那种 【服务态度】:非常好,很配合 【时间管理】:时间充足 【卫生环境】:事前事后有清洗,课室干净 【额外加分项】:听话,很配合,有耐心 【综合评价】:超级好评 【流程小文】:今大刚好有空就临时起意想放松一卜,在群里刷到了这位老师便直接打车前往。到达后老师已经留好了门,老师态度亲切,俏皮可爱,交完学费进浴室开启陪洗,老师洗的非常细心,温润舒适,服务意识在线。回到房间直接开始口,老师的口活儿确实有一手,舌功了得。因为个人比较喜欢掌控节奏,便没有让她女上,直接由我主导。先以传教士姿势起手,明显感觉到小穴的包裹感极…

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @qfdpyqv2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“乔菲的朋友圈” (@qfdpyqv2), 76 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qfdpyqv2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.