Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Q

@qesgk8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,507subscribers

+10,059 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004498291922
TypeChannel
Username@qesgk8
Description🤖 BOT @qer88_bot 人工客服 @bailang1 本机器人数据取自互联网公开信息,仅用于个人信息泄露风险自查,不具备法律效力。
Created9 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qesgk8

Growth

44810,5075,477.510 August 2026 — 448 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,467 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,497 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,499 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,505 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,507 subscribers10 August 202614 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net +10,059. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:5910,507+2
13 Aug 2026, 09:4610,505+6
12 Aug 2026, 09:2310,499+2
11 Aug 2026, 11:0510,497+30
10 Aug 2026, 12:5210,467+10,019
10 Aug 2026, 00:00448first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.54%
avg views ÷ 10,507 subscribers
Avg views / post
267
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 4 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held4 (9 July 202629 July 2026)
Views total267
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
850.0%
👍318.8%
🤝212.5%
👏16.25%
😘16.25%
😢16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC267 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

机器人大更新完成 请重新打开机器人

3

13 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC≈5,270 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🏳️‍🌈祈厄(Q)机器人使用指南 ①综合查询 综合查询可发送 姓名 身份证 QQ 手机号 车牌号 微博ID 等信息 即可返回查询出来的信息 ②身份证补齐 支持 x * 两种符号补齐方式 姓名与身份证中间必须空格隔开! 示例:邵智清231xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 邵*/x清 231xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 等方式 返回机器人补齐的数据 ③手机号补齐 支持x * 两种符号补齐方式 示例: 邵智清151xxxx7151 邵*/x清 151xxxx7151 ④猎魔查询 根据底下按钮来进行猎魔查询 猎魔必须已知目标 姓名 地区 剩下的自己筛选 ⑤核验功能 核验功能直接发送二要素 机主二要素 人脸核验 会自动识别需要核验的 二要素核验示例: 户鲁豫 371721201006173283 机主二要素示例: 盛伟 13791430129 人脸核验示例: 照片底下带 姓名 身份证 即可。 🏳️‍🌈机器人官方账号 @qer88_bot

4👍2👏1😘1😢1

11 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC990 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🏳️‍🌈Q机器人 唯一账号 https://t.me/qer88_bot

🤝21👍1

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @qesgk8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,336,895 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Q” (@qesgk8), 10,507 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qesgk8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.