5 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,008–4,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:43
4,011
+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:41
4,009
-4
6 Aug 2026, 14:20
4,013
+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:19
4,011
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:23
4,011
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.4%
avg views ÷ 4,011 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (20 June 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
8,804
Reactions total
556
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 55s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,688 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,135
67.2%
👏
251
14.9%
👍
121
7.17%
💔
50
2.96%
👌
31
1.84%
🔥
29
1.72%
🥰
18
1.07%
😍
17
1.01%
😭
17
1.01%
😐
5
0.296%
💯
4
0.237%
🕊
2
0.118%
😁
2
0.118%
🦄
2
0.118%
👎
1
0.059%
😢
1
0.059%
😱
1
0.059%
🤷
1
0.059%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,688reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پروین، دختر تحصیلکرده روستای اکبرآباد، از هفته پیش مروج و کتابدار خانه بلوط شد.
در مورد شرح مسئولیتش با او گفتگو کردم؛ اما صحبت ما فقط دربارهٔ امانت دادن کتاب و مرتب کردن قفسهها نبود. دربارهٔ یک نگاه تازه به کتاب و کتابخانه صحبت کردیم.
در خانه بلوط، ترویج کتاب فقط به معنی خواندن کتاب نیست. ما میخواهیم کودکان با قصه زندگی کنند؛ قصههای کتابها، قصههای خودشان، قصههای روستا و قصههای پدربزرگها و مادربزرگها.
مروج ک…
خیلی اوقات پیش آمده که در حال خواندن یک کتاب، بلند شدم، کتاب را بستم
راه رفتم
فکر کردم
ایده ای به ذهنم رسید
یادداشتش کردم
و آن را اجرا کردم.
نگاهم به کتاب خوندن اینگونه است، بخوانیم که یاد بگیریم و اجرا کنیم.
و اگر آن کتاب برام کشش داشته باشه ادامه میدم و گرنه سعی می کنم همان ایده را خوب بپرورانم.
* اسماعیل آذری نژاد
در آغاز روستاگردی فکر میکردم هرچه تعداد روستاها و برنامهها بیشتر باشد، اثرگذاری بیشتر است.
اما تجربه به من آموخت: فعالیتهای کوتاهمدت و گذرا، اگرچه حال خوبی ایجاد میکنند، الزاماً اثر تربیتی ماندگار ندارند.
با این نگرش سراغ «خانههای بلوط» رفتم با تمرکز بر چند روستا و هدف مشخص
هر بار که برای خانه بلوط برنامهای طراحی میکنیم، یک سؤال از من دست برنمیدارد:
آیا این فعالیت، با ساختار وجودی کودک هماهنگ است؟ آیا رشد میآفریند یا فقط سرگرمی است؟ آیا شادیِ عمیقِ یادگیری را تجربه میکند یا فقط مشغول انجام یک تکلیف است؟
همین پرسشها باعث شده همیشه به سراغ نظریهها، پژوهشها و تجربههای آموزشی روز دنیا بروم.
امروز همراه چند نفر از مربیان جدید، کتاب «معلم مدرسه کیفی» اثر ویلیام گلسر را خواندیم. بعد …
منبع آب خیلی کثیف شده و جلبک گرفته بود،خانه بلوط روستای لیرکک هشت ماه بخاطر مشکلی تعطیل بود.
امروز دوتا مربی خارج از استان داوطلبانه آمدند که دو هفته با بچهها فعالیت کنند.
رضا یک ساعت داخل منبع آب رفت و حسابی تمیزش کرد، آرین رفت برای مهمان ها گاز آورد.
مادربزرگ سالخورده ای وقتی دید در کوچه دنبال کپسول و پیک نیک می گردیم.
گفت عزیزم این موقع برای غذا درست کردن دیر شده، من یک بشقاب غذا تو خونه دارم براتون میارم،گفتم: …
امروز برای مربیان خانه های بلوط کارگاه تسهیلگری داشتم، بعد از آنکه با رویکرد مشارکتی؛ اصول، اهداف و شیوه تسهیلگری را گفتم.
کتاب بیدی نشر زعفران را باهم خواندیم.
این قصه در مورد مربی هنری است به نام خانم هاترن که سرکوبگر خلاقیت کودکان است.
از مربیان خانه بلوط خواستم با همه اصولی که در کارگاه یاد گرفتید این داستان را تغییر دهید به خانم هاترنی که پرورش دهند خلاقیت است.
به تصاویر کتاب، گفتگوی خانم هاترن و دانشآموزان و.…
اگر توانستیم در خانههای بلوط روستاها،
مهارت شنیدن و گفتگو را در کودکان پرورش دهیم، نصف راه را با موفقیت رفتیم.
❤60👏14👍10🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qesekodak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,003,848 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قصه.رنگ.توپ” (@qesekodak), 4,011 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qesekodak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
