Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for гайд по Петербургу

Channel

гайд по Петербургу

@qdmspb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,480subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002182553328
TypeChannel
Username@qdmspb
Descriptionавтор Анастасия Паутова
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qdmspb

Growth

11,46211,48011,4717 August 2026 — 11,478 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,478 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,471 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,466 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,463 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,470 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,468 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,463 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,462 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,480 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,459–11,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 12:1311,480+18
15 Aug 2026, 18:1611,462-1
14 Aug 2026, 04:0811,463-5
12 Aug 2026, 22:4811,468-2
11 Aug 2026, 21:2211,470+7
10 Aug 2026, 22:5111,463-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:3111,466-5
8 Aug 2026, 16:1411,471-7
7 Aug 2026, 18:3111,478no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:2911,478first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 11,480 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,380
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held16 (9 July 202618 August 2026)
Views total37,150
Reactions total1,063
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
741
Videos
34
Links
191

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,475 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,01368.7%
💋18212.3%
custom 54182588949735939001288.68%
💔1087.32%
👏442.98%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,475reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,450 views41 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Какое хорошее новое место открылось на Моховой 31

40💋1

18 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈2,170 views139 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

101💋22💔16

18 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈2,210 views111 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Вчера появилось внезапное желание посмотреть закат с воды, и оно было молниеносно подхвачено дорогими Flotti. Два часа я считал слёзы счастья, глядя на этот город и эти облака.

83💋13💔12custom 54182588949735939003

18 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,140 views97 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💔60custom 54182588949735939001918

12 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈3,380 views129 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Гуляя по набережной Макарова, люблю заходить в «Бутерbrodsky». Я крипую с названия и интерьера, но здесь вкусно, часто немноголюдно, оттого уютно, и к тому же — попугай!🦜 📍наб. Макарова 16

105custom 541825889497359390015💋6👏2💔1

11 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈3,490 views160 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

В любимом The Red Corner (Ул Некрасова 6) к сожалению открыла для себя вкуснейший десерт *к сожалению, потому что я могу есть его бесконечно 💔🔨 ♾️

127custom 541825889497359390022💋7👏2💔2

7 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC≈7,650 views58 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

сегодня 8.08 встречаемся на показе фильма «Грация» в ресторане «Kira», а после обсудим фильм *узнать подробности о билетах можно в чате @kirarestaurant.

35💋11custom 54182588949735939008💔3👏1

6 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈4,050 views76 reactionsread 18 August 2026

4 год подряд приезжаю сюда 🐚

62custom 54182588949735939007👏3💋2💔2

6 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈3,250 views104 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @pautovanastasiavictorovnaPhoto

наконец-то

80💋18custom 54182588949735939004👏1💔1

6 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈2,980 views59 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @pautovanastasiavictorovnaVideo

любимая база отдыха «море»

46👏7custom 54182588949735939003💔2💋1

1 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈4,380 views89 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

1 и 2 августа на Фонтанной 3 в магазине alvaar походит маркет — всем любителям собак особенно рекомендую зайти ❤️

64💋13custom 541825889497359390011💔1

12 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTC≈6,350 views60 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

45👏12💔2💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @qdmspb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 53,570 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“гайд по Петербургу” (@qdmspb), 11,480 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qdmspb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.