Channel
@qdashijian01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
44subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003941974463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qdashijian01 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 12 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qdashijian01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 44 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 43 | +11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 32 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 27 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友爆料：缅东三佛塔“强盛集团”黑园区曝光。做国盘和美盘。坐标：15.47292,98.28404。 【老板】文哥【主管】清风、泰哥【组长】月亮、导演、小雨、衍森、小刀、陆军【后勤人员】基哥、文强、阿力、阿来、阿龙【公司主要打手】阿进，是最心狠手辣的刽子手，把人直接打到伤残。 此公司是去年 8 月从妙瓦底新泰昌搬过去的。目前，园区深处还在不断盖楼。整个园区由文哥一手修建和管理。内有被骗来、绑架来的员工 700 多人，加上管理和缅甸人，共 1000 人左右。 公司极其黑暗，没有人性可言。买来的“猪仔”毫无人权，不允许和家里报平安。一仓库的电棍用来惩罚员工，屁股打烂了都得坐班 18 小时。当天无法添加“新增”有效客户的，用狗链子锁住脖子，强迫“猪仔”在园区里爬行，“游街示众”。 公司里有几个 20 出头的女生，是 2024 年 9 月被拐卖进去后，轮流成为公司几个组长的玩物。她们过着暗无天日的生活，园区全年无休。吃的饭菜都…
金边排查网络诈骗及冷冻食品 突击检查76处场所未见违法行为 金边市政府发言人道桑帕今天上午通报，金边市行政统一指挥部于昨日动员全市14个区，对辖区内的公寓、公寓式酒店、住宅区、客栈及酒店展开全方位大排查，旨在清除隐藏的网络诈骗嫌疑窝点。 据悉，执法人员共突击检查了76处场所，现场登记外籍人员522人（含178名女性），经查均持有合法护照，且未发现任何网络诈骗犯罪迹象。 同日，联合执法力量还对全市8处冷冻食品储存及分销点进行了突击检查，亦未发现任何非法囤积或销售违规冷冻食品的行为。 继续保持一个星期 可以宣布金边清零 🔞未满十八岁禁止观看！！ Must be 18+ to view 🥰 看片频道：https://t.me/bbbbssfkf661155 🥰 亚太大事件；https://t.me/TVT6969 🥰 迪拜头条；https://t.me/tw998433 🥰 『柬埔寨』新闻大事件；https://t.m…
木牌突击检查3处可疑场所 14名无护照外国人被移交处理 6月16日，柬埔寨柴桢省巴域市（Bavet）行政联合指挥委员会联合国家警察总署情报局及柴桢省警察局，在柴桢省初级法院副检察官陈万纳（Chan Vanna）的协调下，对3处涉嫌暗中从事网络诈骗活动的场所展开突击检查。 行动首先对位于巴域中央村、巴域分区的 Dong Tai Park（东泰园区） 进行检查。执法人员在现场新增查封106间房间，并扣押一批通讯设备和相关物品，包括10台一体机电脑、78部手机、1副手铐以及2台SIM Box设备。上述物品已移交柴桢省警察局作进一步调查处理。 随后，执法人员对位于巴域市普拉萨特分区的 Golden Palace Casino（黄金皇宫赌场） 展开检查。经对东泰园区及黄金皇宫赌场两处场所调查后，暂未发现与网络技术诈骗犯罪直接相关的证据。 在第三处检查地点——位于巴域中央村的 N98旅馆 内，执法人员共发现44名外国人，涉及4个国籍…
#网友爆料：地点：柬埔寨（安隆汶赌场）。 我被一个朋友邀请到泰国芭提雅旅游，真名：（白秀丽）。2026年2月1日从广东飞往泰国曼谷，玩了两天后，诱骗我去见一个朋友，然后通过偷渡把我骗到柬埔寨诈骗园区上班。 现在在（柬埔寨安隆汶）。进去以后收了私人手机和护照，根本联系不上外界，更联系不了家人。现在每天挨电、挨罚、挨打。 请求柬埔寨当地政府关注，也请求中国警方、美国FBI重点关注一下。主要针对中国诈骗盘和美国虚拟货币诈骗。 🔞未满十八岁禁止观看！！ Must be 18+ to view 🥰 看片频道：https://t.me/bbbbssfkf661155 🥰 亚太大事件；https://t.me/TVT6969 🥰 迪拜头条；https://t.me/tw998433 🥰 『柬埔寨』新闻大事件；https://t.me/qdashijian01 🥰 商务打广告联系；@xiongmao16886 🥰 每日更新两部
#网友爆料：亚太皇潮国际财务被残杀事件（上图为皇潮国际财务被残杀以后，从十几楼抛尸，制造跳楼假象） 大老板，阿兴，二把手，图图。东方物业大股东，交克村 泰和园区（炮弹坑）、新、老泰昌园区大股东（里面扣押一万多中国人、马来西亚人、香港人、台湾人，至今无法与外界取得联系）， 以投资理财、加密货币的诈骗项目，常年诈骗中国、美国、新加坡、香港……经营这些诈骗园区期间，诈骗获利100多亿美金。 管理交克村新、老泰昌物业的二把手图图（福州人），也是受阿兴指使，残杀亚太皇潮国际嗨场财务的罪魁祸首。 阿兴的电诈集团名为鼎兴，下面一众几十家分公司：强盛、鑫盛、展宏、联盛……大家还记得交克村最黑园区泰昌这个打人保安队长吗？之前叫武松（云南人），后来改名为阿赛，现已被中国警方缉拿回国，正在关押审理中。 阿兴有个亲哥哥，代号阿宣，后来改名浩南，也是帮助阿兴管理资产的人。目前，曼谷404嗨场（图片中大厦5楼，装修奢华，都是他们诈骗资金洗白后建设…
❤1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @qdashijian01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 236,375 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@qdashijian01 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“『柬埔寨』新闻大事件📬” (@qdashijian01), 44 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qdashijian01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.