Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Қазақ абжады

Channel

Қазақ абжады

@qazaqAbjadi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

211subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001356649509
TypeChannel
Username@qazaqAbjadi
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qazaqAbjadi

Growth

2092112108 August 2026 — 210 subscribers8 August 2026 — 210 subscribers8 August 2026 — 209 subscribers15 August 2026 — 211 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 11:44211+2
8 Aug 2026, 15:44209-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:03210no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:01210first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.2%
avg views ÷ 211 subscribers
Avg views / post
49.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held19 (23 November 202527 July 2026)
Views total49
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC49 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @notesandthoughtss

...утверждается, что есть два пути (дескриптивистский и прескриптивистский), причем идти можно только по одному из них. Это ложное разделение, проистекающее, вероятно, из непонимания задач, которые ставятся в рамках лингвистики как науки о языке вообще и отдельных языках в частности, которая основывается на принципе описания, и (школьного/университетского) предмета под названием «английский язык», который — в силу ре

18 Feb 2026, 13:04 UTC657 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

رمضان آيي قوتتي بولسين اورازاميز قبول بولسين آمين Рамазан айы құтты болсын. Оразамыз қабыл болсын. Әмин.

24 Dec 2025, 17:30 UTC473 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Qalai duris?

  1. Сығнақ22%
  2. Сығанақ57%
  3. Сунақ22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Dec 2025, 03:27 UTC447 viewsread 8 August 2026

Шағатай тіліндегі پ، چ، ژ، گ әріптері жайлы • This letter [پ] is fairly uncommon in written Chaghatay. Most of these examples are from a very late 1950s manuscript. • The sound [p] is often represented by the letter ب. The sound [c‌] is often represented instead by the letter ج <j>. The letter چ <c‌> itself is not very common. • This letter [گ] is fairly rare in manuscripts until late. Scribes used ک instead. Anot

15 Dec 2025, 10:07 UTC372 viewsread 8 August 2026

Кроме того глупо искать момент языка когда он застыл и превратился в эталон. Сегодня татары хотят чтобы казахи писали на арабице bash باش вместо bas باس, но почему нужно останавливать на том что было пятьсот лет назад, когда есть еще более старый вариант baĺč зафиксированный в булгарском как بلج? Или, почему вы считаете что мы должны писать besh بش вместо бес, если есть еще более старый вариант *bẹ̄ĺ(k) بيال? Казахс

11 Dec 2025, 06:21 UTC312 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @notehistkz

Жапония сияқты өз тілінде сөйлейтін дамыған елдерді көрген соң, Қазақстанды да сондай ел ретінде көргін келеді екен. Ол үшін қазақ тілін ғылым, мәдениет, даму тілі ретінде көрсету керек. Тек қана тұрмысты деңгейде қолданатын тіл ретінде емес.

7 Dec 2025, 17:48 UTC379 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Қазақтың негізгі жазу жүйесі қандай болуы керек?

  1. Кирил7%
  2. Латын27%
  3. Араб66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Nov 2025, 16:44 UTC414 viewsread 8 August 2026

Любители архаичных форм письменности (это те кто хотят чтобы казахи писали يول и читали жол, писали باشچى и читали басшы) любят приводить в пример архаичность и нелогичность английского. Но я уверен на все сто процентов, что если бы сегодня у носителей английского в принципе была бы возможность провести подобную реформу, они бы ее провели. Но сегодня возможности нет. А любителям архаики нужно посмотреть насколько точ

27 Nov 2025, 16:35 UTC311 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ealdengliscPhoto

SoundSpel — это реальная, документированная попытка упростить английскую орфографию. Главная идея проста: писать как говорим. night> nait, through> thru, people> peepul, enough> enuf, ocean> oshun. Вот как выглядел бы английский текст: A retardaeshon in its velosity had bin suspected in Desember. Then, a faent, remoet spek of liet was discuverd in th reejon of th perterbd planet. "A retardation in its velocity had

24 Nov 2025, 05:08 UTC270 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @qanattan

﷽ Рудный ❌ Сарыбай ✅ Лисаков ❌ Наурызбай ✅ Петропавл ❌ Қызылжар ✅ Павлодар ❌ Кереку ✅ -ов(а), -ев(а), -ин(а) ❌ -ұлы, -қызы ✅ Орыс тілі қаншалық ыңғайлы құрал болғанымен, Құдай қосқан көршіміз орыс халқы қаншалықты жақсы болғанымен, тәуелсіз Қазақстанда орысша топонимдер мен қазақ аты-жөндерінде орысша жұрнақтардың сақталып тұрғаны – ок емес. Қазақстанда орысша топонимдердің сақталуына қарсы болу бұл – русофоб

23 Nov 2025, 20:15 UTC264 viewsread 8 August 2026

Сұрақ не жазба бойынша ұсыныс болса осы жазба астына жазып кетсеңіз болады سوراق نه جازبا بويينشا اوسينيس بولسا اوسي جازبا استينا جازيپ كتسانگيز بولادي

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @qazaqAbjadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Dec 2025, 17:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz97 voters

Qalai duris?

  1. Сығнақ22%
  2. Сығанақ57%
  3. Сунақ22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Dec 2025, 17:48 UTCAnonymous Poll104 voters

Қазақтың негізгі жазу жүйесі қандай болуы керек?

  1. Кирил7%
  2. Латын27%
  3. Араб66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,139,448 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Қазақ абжады” (@qazaqAbjadi), 211 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qazaqAbjadi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.