Channel
@qapton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
99subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001953335076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qapton |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qapton |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 99 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 100 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 103 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 103 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
106 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 33 | 31.1% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 29.2% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 14.2% | |
| 🍾 | 7 | 6.60% | |
| 🦄 | 6 | 5.66% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 5.66% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 3.77% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.943% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2024 to 9 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qapton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2024 to 9 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ребята, у нас важная новость — мы запустили первый портфель с нашим проф. трейдером, который торгует вручную, руками. Не алгоритм, не “умный бот”, не магия — живой трейдинг, как он должен быть. И да, после 11 октября всё это алгашное “бото-говно” — мимо. Мы против. 😂 На этом рынке выживает не тот, у кого больше индикаторов на графике, а тот, кто думает, видит, чувствует момент и умеет принимать решение. Короче: толь…
🔥4
Наши красавчики 🚬 @qapton
❤3🔥1
qapton pinned «Ребята, привет! На связи команда qapton. Долгое время мы оставались в тени и не делились новостями. Но это было не просто так — у нас была важная причина. Мы разрабатывали новый движок. Жека сутками работал над его созданием, Дима занимался аналитикой и…»
Ребята, привет! На связи команда qapton. Долгое время мы оставались в тени и не делились новостями. Но это было не просто так — у нас была важная причина. Мы разрабатывали новый движок. Жека сутками работал над его созданием, Дима занимался аналитикой и тестированием без остановки, а Мавродич поддерживал ребят на всех этапах. Теперь всё готово! Работа завершена. С гордостью представляем вам наши новые портфели: …
👍9🔥3❤2
Guys, let us share a bit of information with you: 1. Our team consists of three people, and we’ve been working in the stock market since 2017. Right now, our main focus is on developing algorithmic strategies for automated cryptocurrency trading. 🤨 2. In 2023, we launched a product called Megachilidae Capital, which includes four portfolios: MCD Dioxys, MCD Bombus, MCD Fidelity, and Mega. 🤔 3. Dioxys, Fidelity and…
👍7❤4
This is the performance chart from the backtest, showing the projected returns for our new strategy. 😎 As you can see, the growth is exponential. 🚬 @qapton
👍7🔥5😱4🍾2
qapton pinned a photo
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «qapton»
We’ve completed a rebranding: Megachilidae Capital is now renamed to qapton. qapton represents our new identity and a new product that will be integrated into the 💎TON ecosystem within ✈️Telegram. Our roadmap: 🪙 Phase 1. October 2024: Completion of the rebranding. ☑️ 🪙 Phase 2. November 2024: Launch of new strategies based on a cutting-edge trading algorithm. Projected annual return: +500%. 🪙 Phase 3. March 2025…
🔥5👎1
qapton pinned «Dear Participants, It has been over a month since our last announcement. Over the past 90 days, the Dioxys strategy has shown a growth of 14%, while Fidelity has gained 10%. There are no results for Bombus, as we have decided to discontinue the Bombus strategy.…»
Dear Participants, It has been over a month since our last announcement. Over the past 90 days, the Dioxys strategy has shown a growth of 14%, while Fidelity has gained 10%. There are no results for Bombus, as we have decided to discontinue the Bombus strategy. However, these results are only a small part of what we aim to achieve. Our goal is to provide high returns in the cryptocurrency sector, and we are making …
🍾5🔥1🦄1🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qapton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 188,021 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“qapton” (@qapton), 99 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qapton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.