Channel
@qalam_row_a
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001488779397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qalam_row_a |
| Description | @ali_bagheriyan www.instagram.com/qalam_row_a |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qalam_row_a |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 142 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 142 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 October 2024 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 171 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
82 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 57 | 69.5% | |
| 👌 | 15 | 18.3% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 9.76% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2024 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
فصاحة سحبان و خط ابن مقلة و حكمة لقمان و زهد ابن ادهم لو اجتمعت في المرء و المرء مفلس فليس له قدر بمقدار درهم —لا ادری خط ابنمقله و فصاحت سحبان زهد ابنادهم و حصافت لقمان اینهمه مر مرد را بههمشده پندار هیچ نیرزد چو بی زر استش همیان —علی باقریان #شعر #ترجمه #تفنن
👏5
مختصری دربارهٔ قلمهای متداول در فارسینگاری (برای هیچمدانها): https://shrr.ir/001PhI #خط_فارسی #فونت #حروفنگاری #حروفچینی
👍11
آرای نگارشی سیدعلی خامنهای هم—آنهایی که من خواندهام—ماقبل غلط ننویسیماند. (قصدم ارزشگذاری نیست.) ـــــ دوستی (اینجا) یادم آورد که ابوالحسن نجفی، در پیشگفتارِ ویراستِ دومِ کتابش، در زمرهٔ کسانی که بیش از همه خود را مدیون نقد و نظر آنان میداند، نخست، از «حضرت آیتالله خامنهای» نام برده است. #ابوالحسن_نجفی #غلط_ننویسیم #سیدعلی_خامنهای
👍7
دربارهٔ اصلِ ادبیاتفهمیِ رهبرِ پیشین و میزان آن، و نیز اظهارنظرهای مرتبطْ زیاد نوشتهاند. من هم، در حدود نُه سال پیش، که در دیدار معهود با شاعران از لزوم هجوگویی سخن به میان آمده بود، یادداشتی ناظر به این موضوع نوشتم: https://shahraranews.ir/fa/publication/content/5529/277283 #سیدعلی_خامنهای #ادبیات_فارسی #هجو #مباهته
👍7
File, posted without a caption
خُرد مشْمر جرم را هرچند باشد اندکی کز بهشت آواره آدم از برای گندم است غزل خاک با این رتبۀ تمکین جنابِ آدمی است چرخ با آن شأن و شوکت در رکابِ آدمی است هر جمالی را نقابی هر گلی را غنچهای است پردۀ زنبوریِ گردون نقابِ آدمی است نیست در مجموعۀ افلاک با این طولوعرض از حقایق آنچه مثبت در کتابِ آدمی است نشئۀ عشقِ الهی را به انسان دادهاند گردشِ این نُهخُم از جوشِ شرابِ آدمی است شاهدِ فرزندیِ آدم نه تنها صورت است هرکه دا…
حامد عسکری، شاعر و نویسنده، مطلبی نوشته است دربارهٔ بیهقی—گمانم به یاری هوش مصنوعی—که خطاهای بزرگی دارد. فیالحال، برشمردن و بازنمودن این خطاها از حوصلهٔ من خارج است؛ فقط توجه شما را جلب میکنم به جملاتی که او به بوالفضل دبیر نسبت داده است، و جملگی جعلیاند. https://shrr.ir/001Xcu (توهین را برنمیتابم.)
👍22👌10👎2
#متناسبات
هو آدم به چشمِ کم مَبین قدِّ بلنداقبالِ آدم را که باشد از عَلَم شیرازه لشکرهای عالم را در این بساط من آن آدمِ سیهکارم که فکرِ دانه برآورد از بهشت مرا برهانِ آدمیّتِ ما قدسیان بساند گو شعلهزادهای ننماید سجودِ ما شنیدی روزیِ آدم چه شد از خوردنِ گندم به نانِ جو قناعت کن ز نانِ گندمین اینجا بهشتی شد مرا نظّارۀ آن روی گندمگون اگر گندم برون انداخت از فردوس آدم را خُرد مشْمار گنه را که گناهی است بزرگ گندمی کرد ز …
👏3👌1
فهرست جلد اول از جملهٔ دو مجلد متناسبات بابالألف: آدم، آینه، ابرو، آتش، آغوش، آسیا، آبله بابالباء: بدن، بیاض گردن، بناگوش، بوسه، بهله، بلبل و گل، بید مجنون، باران و ابر، برق، بوریا، بادام، پسته، پیوند، پیاله، پیمانه، پل، پرگار و مرکز، پیری بابالتاء: تیر و کمان، تیغ و شمشیر، توکل، تمکین، تبخال، ترازو و میزان، تنور، تاک، توبه بابالجیم: چین ابرو، چشم، جام، جرس، چنار، چراغ بابالحاء: حباب و حنا بابالخاء: خامشی، خم …
👌2
متناسبات گزیدهٔ موضوعی اشعار صائب به انتخاب و خط شاعر ـــــ پیشگفتار چند سال پیش از این، دوست ارجمند نسخهپژوه، سیدامیر منصوری، مرا از وجود گزیدهای ویژه از سرودههای صائب تبریزی، ظاهراً به خط خود شاعر، آگاه کرد. این نسخه، تحت عنوان «دیوان»، به شمارهٔ ۲۴۲۰ در بخش دیجیتال کتابخانهٔ مرکزی و مرکز اسناد دانشگاه تهران نگهداری میشود. مضمون این نسخه، که حسین باستانی راد مقدمهای بر آن نوشته است، در پی میآید. نکاتی که …
👍2
برخی بخشهای کتاب، ازجمله روی جلد و پشت جلد و شناسنامه، در مقبولافتادن کار اهمیتی دوچندان دارند؛ طی فرایند پیشتولید و تولید کتاب نیز در مراقبت از آنها بایست دوچندان کوشید. ناظران چاپ هم نظر دریغ ندارند. ــــــــــ تذکر • حکم منطق است که بهصرفِ دیدنِ شمارِ اندکی از ایندست اشکالات در یک کتاب—کتابی که آن را خواندنی یافتهایم—از کل آن صرفنظر نکنیم. (البته، بهحکم احساس، چند ناسزای سبک نثارِ اولیای نشرِ خاطی میت…
👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @qalam_row_a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 803,773 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قلمروِ علیِ باقریان” (@qalam_row_a), 142 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qalam_row_a.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.