5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 20:34
145
-1
23 Aug 2026, 04:04
146
-2
14 Aug 2026, 18:22
148
-2
8 Aug 2026, 20:00
150
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:10
150
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
126 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
32
25.4%
❤
30
23.8%
🤯
13
10.3%
💯
10
7.94%
😍
7
5.56%
🙈
7
5.56%
😁
5
3.97%
👏
4
3.17%
😢
4
3.17%
🎉
2
1.59%
👍
2
1.59%
🙉
2
1.59%
🥴
2
1.59%
❤🔥
1
0.794%
👌
1
0.794%
😭
1
0.794%
🙊
1
0.794%
🤔
1
0.794%
🤩
1
0.794%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 30 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qa_box. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 November 2025 to 30 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧠 Scrum vs Kanban: ключевые отличия
📌 Scrum — итеративный фреймворк
- Работа ведётся фиксированными спринтами (1–4 недели)
- Чёткие роли: Scrum Master, Product Owner, Development Team (QA входит в команду)
- Артефакты: бэклог продукта, бэклог спринта, инкремент
- Ритуалы: планирование спринта, ежедневный стендап, обзор спринта, ретроспектива
- Фиксированный объём работы на спринт, изменения в ходе спринта не приветс…
🧠 Популярные техники тест-дизайна с примерами
📌 Классы эквивалентности и граничные значения
Используются практически для любого поля ввода.
➡️ Пример: Поле «Возраст пользователя» от 18 до 100 лет.
* Классы эквивалентности:
* Валидный: числа от 18 до 100.
* Невалидный: числа меньше 18, числа больше 100, нечисловые символы, пустое поле.
* Граничные значения: 17, 18, 19, 99, 100, 101.
📌 Таблицы решений
Идеальны для сл…
📌 Что такое тестирование со смещением влево (Shift Left Testing)?
Это подход, при котором тестирование начинается на самых ранних этапах жизненного цикла разработки ПО (SDLC) — «сдвигается» влево по временной шкале. Цель — выявлять дефекты как можно раньше, когда их исправление наименее затратно.
🧠 Основная идея
Традиционная модель часто предполагает, что тестирование — это этап, следующий после разработки. Shift L…
📌 Тестирование чёрного ящика
🧠 Тестировщик не видит внутреннее устройство системы (код, архитектуру). Проверка строится на основе требований, спецификаций и пользовательского интерфейса.
Цель: Проверить, что система работает так, как ожидается с точки зрения внешнего поведения.
Пример: Функциональное, приемочное, Usability-тестирование.
📌 Тестирование белого ящика
🔐 Тестировщик имеет полный доступ к коду и внутренне…
🧠 Тестирование процесса оплаты в интернет-магазине — это комплексная проверка, где важна каждая деталь. Вот структурированный подход.
📌 Основные этапы процесса:
1. Выбор товара → Корзина.
2. Ввод/выбор адреса доставки.
3. Выбор способа оплаты.
4. Ввод платежных данных.
5. Подтверждение платежа (на стороне магазина и платежного шлюза).
6. Получение чека/подтверждения.
7. Обновление статуса заказа в личном кабинете и …
📌 Сравнение 401 Unauthorized и 403 Forbidden
🧠 Краткая суть:
* 401 Unauthorized — проблема с аутентификацией (кто ты?). Сервер не знает, кто вы, потому что нет или неверны учётные данные.
* 403 Forbidden — проблема с авторизацией (что тебе можно?). Сервер знает, кто вы, но у вашего учётной записи недостаточно прав для доступа к ресурсу.
🔀 Основные различия:
401 Unauthorized
* Состояние: Пользователь не идентифицир…
🧠 Что такое WebSocket?
WebSocket — это протокол полнодуплексной связи поверх TCP-соединения, позволяющий устанавливать постоянное соединение между клиентом и сервером. В отличие от HTTP-запросов, которые закрываются после ответа, WebSocket остаётся открытым, что даёт возможность обмениваться данными в реальном времени с минимальными задержками.
📌 Ключевые особенности:
- Двусторонняя связь: сервер может отправлять д…
The shares total 363%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥3❤2🥴2😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qa_box. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 363%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 30 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@qa_box named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@qa_box_manager named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“QA BOX” (@qa_box), 145 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qa_box.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.