Channel
@q68zm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
229subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002310305864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @q68zm |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/q68zm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 229 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 231 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 231 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (24 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 32 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
感恩哥哥對多多的支持和信任吖 #雙北 #小雨的資訊 https://t.me/tea_dac8/7979?single ＃外送茶 ＃客評 #喜歡大奶的哥哥不要錯過哦 身高：165 體重：50 年齡：27 胸部：很大應該有G 態度：很好 超好 有無刺青：有小刺青 很漂亮 過程：謝謝多多今天介紹的，讓我體驗了之前沒有過的體驗，乳交我第一次嘗試好舒服 ，從進門到離開都在玩， 舌吻到差點沒辦法呼吸 ，整體來說今天就是來炸乾玩到爽的。走之前還要在吃 回衝機率（100%）：會 有需要改進的地方嗎？：沒有 很棒 對多多的評價：超會為我着想的，感覺不是為了業績，而是真的為了我的性福着想
想跟所有一路陪伴我的哥哥們說一聲謝謝 謝謝你們願意相信我 願意把每一次的安排交給我 願意在我遇到困難的時候拉我一把 謝謝每一位支持過我的人
⚠️想跟大家分享一個 真實發生在我客人身上的事情 前幾天 有一位認識一段時間的客人 本來都已經跟我預約好隔天的約會了 結果晚上突然跟我說 多多 不好意思 明天幫我取消吧😭 他跟我說 在網路上認識一個女生 聊了兩個星期 還告白成功了 所以不想做對不起對方的事情 我尊重他的選擇 只是聊天的時候 他提到一句 對方有跟他聊虛擬貨幣😱 ☺️ 我就跟他說 如果開始聊投資 虛擬貨幣 先匯款 先買點數 真的要多留一個心眼 我不是因為你取消約會才這樣說☺️ 我是站在朋友的立場🙊 因為這一年 我真的看過太多客人被騙了 當時他還跟我說一句話 錢不出去 就是真愛 我也希望 是我想太多 結果幾天後 他主動傳訊息給我 第一句就是 她確定是詐騙 我問他 怎麼發現的 他說 女生一直希望他完成虛擬貨幣平台的身分驗證 可是驗證一直沒有通過 後來女生的態度馬上變了 原本每天主動聊天 突然開始愛回不回 變得很冷淡 那一刻 他才真的確定 對方在乎的不是他 而是他有沒…
🚨 多多提醒哥哥們，最近詐騙真的很多！ 🚨 最近有不少詐騙集團假冒茶莊、假冒經紀人，甚至盜用照片、名稱、對話方式來騙哥哥們。 🙏 哥哥們一定要認準「多多」本人，不要加錯帳號、更不要相信陌生人。 📌 多多家的約會原則一直都沒有變： ✅ 見面滿意再現金消費。 ✅ 不會要求哥哥先線上付款。 ✅ 不會要求匯款、買點數、購買遊戲卡。 ✅ 不會用任何理由要求先付訂金或保證金。 ⚠️ 只要有人要求： ❌ 先匯款 ❌ 先付訂金 ❌ 線上交易 ❌ 購買點數、虛擬貨幣或其他付款方式 100% 都請提高警覺，很有可能就是詐騙！ 哥哥們如果有任何疑問，先來問多多確認，不要急著付款，也不要相信任何自稱是「工作人員」或「客服」的人。 ❤️ 多多最希望的是哥哥們每一次約會都開開心心，也希望大家的辛苦錢不要被詐騙集團騙走。 請認準多多聯繫方式TG只有這兩隻賬號， 其他帳號一律不要相信！ 🙏 請大家互相提醒、幫忙分享，也祝哥哥們都平安、不被詐騙。
為什麼選妹要聽介紹人的建議❓ 🚗買車時，你會聽取銷售專員的介紹，因為他們熟悉各車款的性能、配置和市場評價，能助你找到最符合需求的座駕。 🏠買房時，你會諮詢房產經紀人，因為他們掌握區域行情、房屋結構和未來增值潛力，能幫你挑選理想的家。 📈投資股票時，你會參考財務顧問的 分析，因為他們了解市場趨勢、公司基本面和風險控管，能為你制定最適的投資策略。 🍱如果你是做餐飲業的，我去你的店吃飯，一定會聽看看你的推薦，因為你每天都在做，你比我更了解那道菜更符合客人的需求，值得一試。 💃🏼多多我每天接觸各式各樣的小姐，知道她們的特點，知道誰最符合你的要求。 👂我的建議，是建立在無數成功案例和客人反饋之上，目的只有一個，讓每一次安排都符合你的需求，提升滿度！ 🤦♂️與其自己憑感覺。不如多聽看看專業人士的建議，會降低你踩雷的風險讓你的每一次約會都滿意而歸，讓你的錢花的物有所值。
在給弟弟加入一位老點🥰🥰🥰🥰 弟弟學壞了 知道嚇唬我了 嘻嘻 #高雄 #菲菲 #口袋名單 #混血女生 弟弟說：服務很好 很有熱情 胸也大 口交 傳教士 女上 後入 在回到傳教士射精 給90分✔️
多多 當你的專屬窗口~ 有需要找我就好 給我給你一次機會
❤1
很多人第一次都會怕 怕被騙 怕遇到雷 怕花了錢結果不舒服 但其實找對窗口真的差很多 多多不是想隨便成交而已 而是希望你每一次約會 都可以安心 放鬆 不用提心吊膽 上面這篇很長 但如果你願意看完 你會知道為什麼很多客人最後都固定找多多 🤍 因為舒服的不是只有過程 而是有人願意幫你顧好細節的感覺 📱 Line🆔 li26226 ⭐Gleezy🆔 lin521 📱TG🆔 @ID_52013
你是我一天好心情的開始 所以早安一定要先說給你聽 早安 多多開始營業咯
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @q68zm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,079,180 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“多多家~客評專區” (@q68zm), 229 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/q68zm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.