Channel
@pzbg365t
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002003705648 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pzbg365t |
| Description | 全球AI经济动态：https://t.me/xwtt365 吃瓜群众/最新热点/东南亚黑料/色瓜：https://t.me/QAQ1145 骗子曝光/黑公司跑路/注意闭坑：https://t.me/pzbg365t 最新电信诈骗/警惕电信诈骗：https://t.me/jtzp365 HAPAY全球支付频道：https://t.me/HApaygf 投稿：@Leo88169 @@xile227 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 27 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pzbg365t |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 23 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2024 to 11 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
#菲律宾 曝光一个菲律宾狗比，两个月前欠了50万P不还，有钱去赌有钱去开店，开一辆雷克萨斯。 双向删除聊天记录还拉黑，几万块人都不会做了去做狗，拿着这几万块提前给你全家买棺材了。 Ps: 现在欠钱的都是大爷！
❤1
#柬埔寨 #迪拜 狗盘总道义在迪拜做国内大区盘、坑粉商几百万迪拉姆。 该人员拖欠员工工资、拖欠房东房租，去年年底从迪拜潜逃至西港。 寻求知道详细地址的人，愿意支付10000U，如果能把其手脚打断者，愿意支付20000U。
#群友投稿 此人外号悠悠，可能叫张小诗，真名叫何六娣。在世纪园区之前带着女孩子，后来在园区跟人打跑得快，欠人40多万。然后到国内来了一句"接着玩，不然不还了"，直接拒绝还钱。目前跑路回国，可能在佤邦。 在世纪园区别墅住的时候，偷别人的沙子和钱，被别人赶出来。各种假怀孕骗钱，并带其他女孩子从特区过来。给了她路费，结果她自己跑去赌场输光，然后向公司后勤一直拖欠钱。即便没有钱，还大言不惭地扬言自己很有钱。在群里曝光我，曝光完又声称对我其实很好？这种逻辑让人费解。
#黑公司 #苗洼地恒升园区4期 苗洼地恒升园区4期，我们家小孩被恒升4期里面一个公司从蛇头手上卖到恒升4期园区，他们一行12人全部被卖到这个园区。 这个黑公司的老板是广东人，园区还有很多像这种被强制性卖到园区里的，去了就让签合同，不签就打、用电棍电，这些小孩在园区内遭受非人的虐待，精神几近崩溃，现在我们12个人的家属已经集体上访公安部和驻缅甸大使馆，希望国家能引起重视，救救我们的小孩吧！ 后续再更新园区股东和黑公司股东的更多信息资料，以及这12个小孩的身份证、护照。
#曝光 此人是大其力某园区公司老板，他的公司是做国内盘的简直就是一个黑公司，打骂员工都是家常便饭，在我已知的就有两个员工，受不了公司高压打骂选择跳楼，我是他老乡，在2023年叫我来到他公司做代理帮他叫人做业绩，我也帮他叫来了十几个人，干了一年下来也做了差不多一千万就我就拿了差不多三四十万，还扣了我五十万做风险金，一月份在园区被一伙老缅持枪冲园区抢劫，公司手机现金和值钱的东西都被抢了，损失大概有一千多万人民币左右，停工了差不多半个月左右，在我不知情的情况下把我底下叫过来的员工卖掉了七个，这些人都是家里的朋友兄弟都是知根知底的，我找他争论吵架，他喝多酒了，叫人把我打了一顿，以莫须有的事情强加在我头上，说我乱搞要带公司的人偷跑去别的公司，还把我关起来了，一喝酒了就过来打我折磨我，我的手指都被他折断了三根，还逼我喝尿，对待老乡都是如此残忍的手段，后面把我放出来了，我就跟我下面的员工一起偷跑出来了那个园区，到了安全地方我联系被他卖掉的七个…
#网友投稿 曝光#湄龙湾公司 顺安 名（顺安），位于8栋8楼，盘总（兰总）真实姓名陈X X，财务（陈XX），此公司打着兄弟情谊的旗号，克扣变相压榨代理线，我相信大家都知道海外市场走交易所不会产生有洗钱费用，公司收取我们5个点位洗钱费用，如果走直通车，还要收取百分之20手续费，风险金也收取5个点位，平台费用也收取5个点，USDT汇率6.6，从未超过6.65，想必会算账的弟兄都懂怎么算！弟兄们累死累活完全和利益不成正比！找盘总协商之前多扣留资金无果，被逼无奈曝光他们黑心作为！不解决将会公布掌握的真实资料！大家出来赚钱都不容易！都想找个好公司！后期会公布盘总管理的照片资料！
#群友爆料：此人 赵福安 旅居菲律宾 广西副会长 开设资金盘 发币圈钱 发行ents虚拟币 币 几天就归零 据说此人原本是 某园区资金盘小狗推 后来拉技术自己单干 此人无恶不作 在菲律宾为非作歹 仗着在广西分会有点关系无限圈钱 欠钱不还 看到此人一定要小心 当面一套 背后一套 会把你骗的团团转
#网友吐槽 海景花园一个老胖保姆，各位同胞请避坑，现在还混迹在海景花园打游击，帮人打扫房间。 1.聚众淫乱，3月18号晚被我抓现行 被开除的最直接原因，长期利用公司宿舍留宿社会闲杂人等，不定时开paty。结束之后，使用我员工房（3房的）一对一个房间过夜，比酒店还方便。干啥你们懂。而且。几乎每天私自带男人回员工宿舍睡觉，还和室友女保姆挤一间。画面不堪入目。有人愤而举报。有员工举报图为证。才知晓，不然员工宿舍，长期以来，秉着信任原则。未巡查。 2.消极怠工。睡懒觉。一年多以来。同样的工作量，每天花费时长越来越久。只是为了洋装工作很辛苦，等待我给他加工资。每天叫他打扫，都要很久才到，其实是要么出去找男人，咱们在宿舍睡觉。就这德行。还指望我给他加工资。我把她开除之后。现在同样工人，同样工作量只需要原来3分之二的时间。 3.倚老卖老，欺压、排挤新人 仗着工作一年多时长最长，排挤不是他亲戚的其他保姆，以前信任他，需要保姆…
❤2
曝光下财神跑分，付款后直接就删除拉黑了 @cszf8888 @caishenpaofen88 此人是骗子哦大家小心了
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @pzbg365t. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 933,652 of 1,480,740entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pzbg365t named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“骗子曝光/黑公司跑路/注意闭坑” (@pzbg365t), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pzbg365t.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.