7 measurements spanning 17 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,696–4,733 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 05:53
4,700
-8
22 Aug 2026, 13:05
4,708
-7
19 Aug 2026, 13:43
4,715
-7
16 Aug 2026, 08:05
4,722
-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:02
4,724
-3
9 Aug 2026, 02:01
4,727
-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:47
4,729
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 March 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
PyTip for the day:
Use the "enumerate" function to iterate over a sequence and get the index of each element.
Sometimes when you're iterating over a list or other sequence in Python, you need to keep track of the index of the current element. One way to do this is to use a counter variable and increment it on each iteration, but this can be tedious and error-prone.
A better way to get the index of each element is t…
print('xy'.isalpha())
#What is the output of the above code?
xy8%
True51%
False21%
xy.isalpha10%
Error4%
Show me the answer6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @python_interview_questions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
print('iGnani'.translate({'i': '1', 'G': '2', 'n': '3', 'a': '4', 'i': '5'}))
#What is the output. Explain translate()
12343539%
1234520%
iGnani16%
Error9%
None of the above5%
Show me the answer12%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2020 to 12 April 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Python Questions” (@python_interview_questions), 4,700 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/python_interview_questions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
