Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pyrohgen

Channel

Pyrohgen

@pyrohgen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,542subscribers

-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003181761737
TypeChannel
Username@pyrohgen
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pyrohgen

Growth

1,5421,6011,571.57 August 2026 — 1,601 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,601 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,599 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,592 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,583 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,575 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,572 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,565 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,546 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,542 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 21 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,533–1,610 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 21:321,542-4
26 Aug 2026, 02:541,546-19
23 Aug 2026, 10:071,565-7
20 Aug 2026, 03:131,572-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:031,575-8
14 Aug 2026, 06:351,583-9
11 Aug 2026, 08:021,592-7
8 Aug 2026, 18:011,599-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:171,601no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:431,601first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 24s
Average length
2m 17s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
929.0%
👍619.4%
🔥516.1%
💯412.9%
39.68%
🎉13.23%
👏13.23%
😱13.23%
🫡13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC100 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Graphene concrete has been "five years away" for fifteen years. Here's what's actually blocking it. Concrete is the most used material on Earth after water. Cement production alone accounts for roughly 8% of global CO₂ emissions. Everyone knows nanocarbon could fix this — stronger concrete, less cement, longer-lasting infrastructure. So why isn't it everywhere? Two reasons nobody likes to say out loud: 1. Economic

3💯3🔥3

15 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC127 viewsread 7 August 2026

I'm 44. I trained as a psychologist. The last code I touched was BASIC at school, and I've forgotten all of it. I cannot program. That's been true my whole life. Last week I built an enormous working script. Four days, an hour a day, in a new tool called Antigravity. Here's the entire method. I told the machine, in plain words, what I wanted. It wrote the code. The code had bugs — of course it did — so I said so, a

15 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC151 viewsread 7 August 2026

name turned out to be an exact description. Nobody intended the prophecy — and that's what makes it worth pausing on. A deliberate warning we could dismiss as superstition. This is stranger: the language knew before we did. The word sat there for sixty years, patiently accurate, waiting for its meaning to arrive. And every culture on earth — European, Russian, Arab, Chinese, take your pick — tells the same story abo

10 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC183 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Why would God give the desert a lake of black filth instead of water? 🏜️ For thousands of years, people walked past oil seeps and saw a curse. Sticky, stinking, undrinkable. At best — tar for caulking boats and feeding torches. Travelers cursed these "devil's lakes" while dying of thirst beside them. Nobody could imagine that this black filth would one day become fabric, medicine, packaging, paint, and the plastic

💯1

5 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC273 viewsread 7 August 2026

We're back — with a new order of priorities. 🧅⚡ The months of uncertainty in our region kept us busy. Now, to the point. Our reactor has always produced two products from one methane molecule: turquoise hydrogen and high-purity carbon. From June 2026, onion-shaped graphene (CNO) is our core product. Hydrogen — available on request. Here's the logic: Hydrogen remains a vital goal for the era we're all heading into

25 Feb 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,450 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​🚀 REVOLUTION IN ENGINE OILS: EXTENDING DRAIN INTERVALS BY 4X! Following our breakthrough in industrial metalworking, we have taken our nanotechnology to the most massive sector of all — Internal Combustion Engines (ICE). And the results have exceeded all expectations! 🚐 The Extreme Endurance Test To rigorously stress-test our product, we selected a commercial workhorse: a 2025 Toyota Hiace. The vehicle was operate

1

19 Feb 2026, 17:53 UTC≈1,720 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Graphene vs. Oil Spills: The Future of Environmental Cleanup 🌊🛢️ Can a tiny carbon particle save our oceans? In this video, we explore the incredible sorption power of Carbon Nano-Onions (CNO)—a spherical allotrope of graphene produced by PyroHgen. Why Graphene? Unlike traditional methods, these "nano-balls" act as a high-tech sponge for pollutants: Insane Capacity: Just 1 kg of graphene can collect 100 kg of spil

👍21

5 Feb 2026, 19:21 UTC≈1,260 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​🛡️ GRAPHENE "ONIONS": A POCKET-SIZED PURIFICATION PLANT Imagine you’re on a deep raid or a long-distance ruck. Your only water sources are murky puddles, stagnant ponds, or rivers tainted with industrial runoff. Carrying liters of water is dead weight; standard filters clog in minutes. Enter the future of survival: Carbon Nano Onions (CNO)—a revolutionary sorbent that turns your medical kit into a high-tech water

1👍1🫡1

1 Feb 2026, 06:37 UTC654 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​BE FIRST IN THE GRAPHENE ERA: Global Partner Program This is not a search for typical sales reps. We are opening a strategic opportunity for entrepreneurs. We are seeking partners to hold exclusive distribution rights for Onion-Shaped Graphene (CNO) in specific territories: from megacities to entire nations. MARKET CONTEXT In 2010, the Nobel Prize for graphene changed science. Today, our industrial production of s

4😱1

26 Jan 2026, 18:55 UTC515 viewsread 7 August 2026

​Why the Future of Mechanics is Spherical We have grown used to the idea that fighting a seized bolt is always a lottery. You soak the assembly with penetrating oil, wait, hammer it, and hope for a miracle. The technology behind these products hasn’t changed in decades. At their core lies chemistry: 90% solvent, a little oil, and the hope that it penetrates deep enough. But chemistry has a physical limit. The momen

23 Jan 2026, 14:07 UTC469 viewsread 7 August 2026

​$60 Billion Up in Smoke: Why the World Continues to Burn Money in the Sky When a Solution Already Exists While Europe and Asia scramble for affordable energy and climatologists sound the alarm over every gram of CO2, a colossal economic absurdity is unfolding across the globe. Every year, oil companies burn approximately 150 billion cubic meters of gas into the atmosphere. This volume alone would be enough to power

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pyrohgen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pyrohgen” (@pyrohgen), 1,542 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pyrohgen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.