18 measurements spanning 19 days, net +289. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,024–16,414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 22:38
16,358
+3
26 Aug 2026, 00:42
16,355
-7
25 Aug 2026, 02:04
16,362
-4
23 Aug 2026, 14:07
16,366
+2
22 Aug 2026, 03:18
16,364
-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:36
16,365
+1
19 Aug 2026, 21:42
16,364
+1
18 Aug 2026, 18:55
16,363
+1
17 Aug 2026, 20:18
16,362
-7
16 Aug 2026, 20:15
16,369
+7
15 Aug 2026, 08:46
16,362
+37
14 Aug 2026, 01:55
16,325
+2
12 Aug 2026, 16:33
16,323
-5
11 Aug 2026, 13:43
16,328
-7
10 Aug 2026, 13:33
16,335
+30
9 Aug 2026, 15:17
16,305
+236
8 Aug 2026, 12:37
16,069
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:48
16,069
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 16,358 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,160
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
71 (3 August 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
224,128
Reactions total
7,479
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,880
Videos
≈1,040
Links
≈589
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 41s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,479 reactions across 71 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5289852751646311156
3,819
51.1%
custom 5391330996215885687
1,663
22.2%
custom 5390935597231647633
675
9.03%
👍
634
8.48%
😁
278
3.72%
custom 5289481928464942037
205
2.74%
custom 5291921207896064613
197
2.63%
👎
8
0.107%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,479reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📖 27 августа. Ежедневное чтение.
ОТКРЫТОСТЬ ДЛЯ ПРОВЕРКИ
«Только все должно быть благопристойно и как подобает» (1 Коринфянам 14:40).
Искренняя открытость могла бы помочь нам преодолеть известное заблуждение о том, что христиане занимаются чем-то оторванным от жизни. Став искренними и откровенными перед Богом и людьми, мы ю лишим наших врагов их собственного оружия. Нам ни в коем случае нельзя идти на поводу у тех…
📖 26 августа. Ежедневное чтение.
СЛОВА И ДЕЛА
«Дети мои! Станем любить не словом или языком, но делом и истиной» (1 Иоанна 3:18).
Обычай подменять дела словами не является чем-то новым, об этом знал еще апостол Иоанн и учил христиан так не делать. Апостол Иаков также обращает на это внимание:«Если брат или сестра наги и не имеют дневного пропитания, а кто-нибудь из вас скажет им: идите с миром, грейтесь и питайтес…
Дорогие наши, мы после онлайн-встречи для незамужних вовсю отвечаем на вопросы девушек в нашем чатике 💓☺️
Это только некоторые вопросы, которые мы успели разобрать:
🩷 Можно ли построить отношения на расстоянии?
🩷 Мне 35+, в церкви вариантов нет, а на конференциях все своими компаниями. Где знакомиться?
🩷 Как не наступать на одни и те же грабли в отношениях и распознавать красные флаги?
Поэтому, если вы не замуже…
📖 25 августа. Ежедневное чтение.
НЕОБХОДИМО ПОДЧИНИТЬСЯ БОГУ
«Приобретение мудрости гораздо лучше золота, и приобретение разума предпочтительнее отборного серебра» (Притчи 16:16).
Человека, который не терпит вмешательства в свою личную жизнь, ничто не может заставить следовать за Христом. «Если кто хочет», – сказал наш Господь, тем самым дав свободу каждому человеку. Христианская жизнь, таким образом, относится к …
«И вот что еще я хочу сказать вам, дорогая моя сестра, женщина по сердцу Божьему: я спокойна и за вас, ибо знаю, что мы с вами едины в этих стремлениях. Быть женщиной по сердцу Божьему, любить Его горячо, всем сердцем – вот наше единственное желание. И – катите ли вы детскую коляску, везете продовольственную тележку или шагаете с алюминиевой тростью; одиноки ли вы, замужем или овдовели; обременены ли детьми или безде…
Без активности и спорта иногда мне кажется, что я бы просто развалилась 🙈
И когда я рассказываю вам о платформе FitStars то часто упоминаю такую классную привилегию: подбирать тренировки под свое состояние!
И сейчас как никогда это ощущаю. Когда многие могут поставить на паузу спорт, я открываю платформу и сейчас для себя нахожу нужные тренировки!!
Больше никаких отговорок и преград!
Просто выделить от 7 до 30 минут …
📖 23 августа. Ежедневное чтение.
ГРЕШНИКИ НЕ ПРИНИМАЮТ ХРИСТА
«Люди более возлюбили тьму, нежели свет, потому что дела их были злы» (Иоанна 3:19).
Я не верю, что кто-либо отверг Христа исходя из философских мотивов. Хотя Израиль не принял Христа, причина этого была не в философских разномыслиях, а лежала исключительно в нравственной плоскости.
Человек, упорно не признающий Господа, поступает так, потому что любит…
Дорогие, читаем ваши сообщения и немного переживаем 🥹❤️
Многие не успели на прямой эфир — кто-то из-за работы, кто-то из-за техники или часовых поясов. Но мы не можем оставить вас без этой важной темы!
Поэтому сегодня, в субботу в 17:00 мск (22 августа) мы проведём повтор нашей встречи.
Запланируйте это время для себя — налейте тёплый чай, устройтесь поудобнее и давайте вместе разберём, как выйти из замкнутого кру…
📖 22 августа. Ежедневное чтение.
ПРИРОДА ИСТИННОЙ ВЕРЫ
«И поведу слепых дорогою, которой они не знают, неизвестными путями буду вести их…» (Исаия 42:16).
Иногда мы склонны винить себя в неверии, хотя на самом деле просто не можем мысленно что-то представить. В Священном Писании есть истины, понимание которых даётся разуму с большим трудом. Существуют вещи, которые мы неспособны вообразить. Мы верим в них, но не мо…
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @pyataykins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как относитесь к тому, что у девушки должна быть своя «планка» при поиске своего человека?
У меня есть эта планка и я считаю, что это правильно87%
Мне кажется, из-за своей высокой планки я останусь одна9%
Я из тех, кто лучше согласится на меньшее, чем останется одна4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 41,607 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pyataykins” (@pyataykins), 16,358 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pyataykins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
