Stronger Together🤝 Every Miners matters. Every connection strengthens the network. Together, we're moving PX Network forward. #PXNetwork #PX #Web3
👍56❤23🔥8🤝4😍1

Channel
@pxnetworknews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
34,166subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002300049901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pxnetworknews |
| Description | 🚀 Welcome to PyramidX – The Future of Digital Currency At PyramidX, we believe in breaking barriers and creating a truly decentralized financial ecosystem where everyone can participate, mine, and transact seamlessly. Our vision is to empower people wor |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pxnetworknews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 34,166 | -16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 34,182 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 34,177 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 34,179 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 34,182 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 34,181 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 34,202 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 34,204 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (23 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 136,010 |
| Reactions total | 3,770 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,770 reactions across 30 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,320 | 61.5% | |
| 👍 | 915 | 24.3% | |
| 🔥 | 207 | 5.49% | |
| 🎉 | 55 | 1.46% | |
| 🥰 | 52 | 1.38% | |
| 💯 | 39 | 1.03% | |
| ✍ | 38 | 1.01% | |
| 🤝 | 36 | 0.955% | |
| 🫡 | 30 | 0.796% | |
| 👏 | 29 | 0.769% | |
| 🤩 | 24 | 0.637% | |
| 🤗 | 13 | 0.345% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 0.318% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,770reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Stronger Together🤝 Every Miners matters. Every connection strengthens the network. Together, we're moving PX Network forward. #PXNetwork #PX #Web3
👍56❤23🔥8🤝4😍1
🌐 Official Website Updated We're excited to introduce the refreshed PX Network website with an improved design, clearer information, and a better experience for our global community. Whether you're discovering PX Network for the first time or have been mining since the beginning, our updated website makes it easier to explore our vision, roadmap, ecosystem, and latest developments. Visit the official website and s…
❤71👍23🔥11🎉5👏3
🎉 Thank You, Pioneers & Miners! The 2X Referral Rate Booster Event has officially come to an end. A big thank you to everyone who invited new Miners and contributed to the growth of Px community. This is just the beginning—stay tuned for more exciting updates and future events! See you in the next event!
❤69👍24🔥8
Posted without readable text
❤60🔥4🥰2
🚀 LIVE NOW! The 2X Referral Rate Booster Event has officially started. 🔥 2X Referral Rate 📢 Ping your referrals 👥 Invite new Miners Let's grow the PX Network together! #PyramidX #PXNetwork #Web3
🎉38👍28❤15🤩8🔥5
Posted without readable text
👍35❤23🥰3🫡3🔥2
🚀 It starts tomorrow! The wait is almost over. The 2X Referral Rate Booster Event begins 10 August 2026. Now is the time to ping your referrals, invite new pioneers, and get ready to grow your network with 2X referral rewards. Let's build the PX Network together. #PyramidX #PXNetwork #web3 #SpecialEvent
❤52💯24👍22🔥9🫡4👏3
Before requesting Creator Hub Profile verification, what should you do?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤65✍13🔥3
☀️ Have a Great Weekend Take a moment to relax, recharge, and enjoy the weekend. We'll keep building the future of PX Network—see you on the journey ahead. #PXNetwork #PX #Weekend #Community
❤62👍16🔥8👏2
Which link should you submit in Creator Hub Content?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤43👍17✍6👏2
TODAY | TOMORROW | ALWAYS PX Network is built with a long-term vision. Today, we're growing a strong global community. Tomorrow, we'll continue expanding our ecosystem with new products and utilities. Always, we'll stay committed to innovation, security, and building real value for our pioneers & Miners. Every day of participation brings us one step closer to the future we're building together. #PXNetwork #PX #Bl…
👍79❤41🔥1
🧱 Built in Layers. Built for the Future. Great ecosystems aren't built overnight—they're built one layer at a time. At PX Network, we're focused on creating a strong foundation before moving to the next milestone. From community growth and KYC to ecosystem development, every step is designed for long-term sustainability and real-world adoption. We're not chasing short-term hype. We're building infrastructure that …
❤86👍31🔥8🫡4✍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @pxnetworknews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Before requesting Creator Hub Profile verification, what should you do?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which link should you submit in Creator Hub Content?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which content can you submit to Creator Hub?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which profile should you submit for Creator Hub verification?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 128,451 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Px Network News” (@pxnetworknews), 34,166 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pxnetworknews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.