Channel
@pwgood_msmp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004393072220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pwgood_msmp |
| Description | credit navigation: qwainett icon: |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 25 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pwgood_msmp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 10 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 10 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 405 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5055366929062037290 | 17 | 38.6% | |
| custom 5238210051994327545 | 12 | 27.3% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 13.6% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.27% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩🤩💤 🍼🥹🦷 Я нашёл двух гастов и одного вырастил. Пока у меня нет элитр, так хоть на чём-то можно передвигаться. Вообще, у меня накопилось много вопросов об этой симуляции: можно ли её вообще сломать, видят ли те, кто за нами наблюдает, что мы храним, могут ли они читать наши книги и так далее... Столько вопросов, аж бесит😅 🔀🔀🔀🔀🔀
💯1🆒1custom 52382100519943275451
— Не хорони меня раньше времени!!! Я в Незере как рыбка в воде! 🥁
🔥1custom 50553669290620372901custom 52382100519943275451
🤩🤩🤩💤 🍼🥹🦷 Вы думали, что я сдох где-то в шахте? Нееее, ребята, я не могу так просто там откинуться :) Покопался в Незере, сделал броню, инструменты. Честно, я готов пойти за ТЫСЯЧИ блоков, что бы найти свою базу. Спросите, почему я не создам новую базу, на новом месте? Ээээ, я не в настроении строить что-то новое, знаете. Всегда успеется... Всегда успеется... 🔀🔀🔀🔀🔀
🆒1custom 50553669290620372901
🤩🤩🤩💤 🍼🥹🦷 Чат, я вернулся, на время, пока копаюсь в шахте. Мысль прокралась. Помню, говорилось, что они смогли воссоздать некоторые постройки с наших серверов. Было бы славно найти свою базу или вообще хоть какую-нибудь постройку с Майншилда.👉 Кому оно принадлежит не имеет смысла. Всё равно тут, как я понял, из наших лишь я и Секби. Чёрт, надо бы найти его. 🔀🔀🔀🔀🔀
🆒1custom 50553669290620372901custom 52382100519943275451
#INTERACT ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ — Привеееет, Юрка. Да, именно так, приятно познакомиться. Недолгое молчание. Пугод посмотрел сначала на Жеку, затем на Юрку. Было принято решение, оставить их на едине. Пусть поговорят спокойно. — Дамы, лучше оставлю вас. Пугод помахал и потопал в шахты. Надо было набрать ресурсов для дальнейшего путешествия.
custom 50553669290620372902⚡1💯1
#INTERACT ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Пугод ходил туда сюда. Явно размышляя. — Мне кажется, здесь никому нельзя доверять по полной, судя по оповещениям об убийствах. Пугод остановился, но не показывал напряжённость. После тот услышал крик. Обернувшись заметил фигуру. — Из тебя плохой разведчик - сказал тот хихикнув.
custom 50553669290620372902custom 52382100519943275452⚡1
#INTERACT ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ — Больше народа меньше кислорода, но в безопастности- Только Пугод хотел продолжить свою речь, так послышался голос... Выслушав объявление парень тяжко вздохнул — Пупупу... Что же они такого натворили?...
⚡1custom 50553669290620372901custom 52382100519943275451
#INTERACT ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ — Жека? Знакомое имя. А вот на счёт сервера, да, не слышал. Пугод выдохнул. Наконец-то, кого-то увидел. — Как твоё выживание продвигается? Не против если присоединюсь? Думаю, так будет по-поспокойнее. Ибо это место вообще не внушает доверие...🔥 Последнее предложение было произнесено полушёпотом с раздражением.
custom 50553669290620372902⚡1custom 52382100519943275451
#INTERACT ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Пвгуд слегка удивился бурной реакцией от чего стало даже неловко. — Эээээ, вроде я. А вот ты- ? Парень сделал паузу, намекая чтобы девушка сказала свой ник.
⚡2custom 50553669290620372902custom 52382100519943275452
💤 Я уже долго брожу здесь. Никого не встретил. Сейчас я в снежном биоме, собрал всё необходимое. Плюс ко всему — здесь можно жить. Было бы классно найти кого-нибудь... Хотя, погодите, я вижу постройку. Так, чат, надо проверить. До связи. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Снег хрустел под ногами. Пугод подошёл к постройке ближе. Никого не было видно. — Прииивееет? Есть кто-нибудь? Голос звучал осторожно, но с каплей любоп…
custom 50553669290620372902💯1🆒1
ANON: Я плохо вёл себя. Не надейся. ✋
💯1custom 50553669290620372901
🗯🗯🗯 🗯🗯🗯 🗯🗯🗯🗯 Последнее, что я помню… — буря. Снежная буря. 🟧Бежать было 🟧бессмысленно, она 🟧надвигалась слишком 🟧быстро. До сих пор 🟧ощущаю холодный ветер 🟧на лице, его последствия. А теперь, я не понимаю. Как? Зачем? Почему я здесь? В этой проклятой симуляции. В ловушке. Они наблюдают. 🔬🧿🧲 Где остальные? Я без понятия, но это невозможно, чтобы я был здесь один. Я …
custom 52382100519943275451
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pwgood_msmp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 934,313 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“██𝙋𝙒𝙂𝙤𝙤𝙙𝅄 ִ ۫” (@pwgood_msmp), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pwgood_msmp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.