Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Khỉ Đít Đỏ

Channel

Khỉ Đít Đỏ

@putieu

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,919subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001934899843
TypeChannel
Username@putieu
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/putieu

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@puzlevn/1505388 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC@putieu/155848 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC1.0069 minutes
@puzlevn/1505689 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC@putieu/155853 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC1.0011 minutes
@puzlevn/1505699 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC@putieu/155854 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC1.008 minutes
@puzlevn/1505759 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC@putieu/155860 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC1.0021 minutes
@puzlevn/1505769 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC@putieu/155861 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC1.0018 minutes
@puzlevn/1505779 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC@putieu/155862 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@puzlevn9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 minutes@puzlevn (9–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 9 of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 9 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @puzlevn. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,9171,9821,949.59 August 2026 — 1,982 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,982 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,979 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,977 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,971 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,968 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,967 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,966 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,967 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,961 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,957 subscribers27 September 2026 — 1,951 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,942 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,934 subscribers15 October 2026 — 1,932 subscribers18 October 2026 — 1,930 subscribers21 October 2026 — 1,925 subscribers24 October 2026 — 1,922 subscribers26 October 2026 — 1,923 subscribers30 October 2026 — 1,920 subscribers2 November 2026 — 1,918 subscribers5 November 2026 — 1,917 subscribers8 November 2026 — 1,919 subscribers1,9199 August 20268 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 91 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,907–1,992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 17:161,919+2
5 Nov 2026, 02:171,917-1
2 Nov 2026, 06:371,918-2
30 Oct 2026, 06:191,920-3
26 Oct 2026, 23:361,923+1
24 Oct 2026, 04:281,922-3
21 Oct 2026, 00:291,925-5
18 Oct 2026, 08:371,930-2
15 Oct 2026, 07:211,932-2
12 Oct 2026, 08:581,934-8
5 Oct 2026, 05:211,942-9
27 Sept 2026, 00:581,951-6
13 Sept 2026, 07:561,957-4
9 Sept 2026, 00:571,961-6
30 Aug 2026, 19:291,967+1
28 Aug 2026, 02:551,966-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:251,967-1
22 Aug 2026, 09:451,968-3
18 Aug 2026, 19:131,971-6
15 Aug 2026, 16:581,977first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 35s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC8 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video cho thấy Pantsir-S1 của Nga bắn liên tiếp vào một UAV FP-2 gần Gelendzhik nhưng trượt cả 3 tên lửa. Theo phân tích, nhược điểm này đã được biết từ thời chiến dịch Syria gần 10 năm trước. Năm 2017, Pantsir-S1 được cho là chỉ đạt hiệu quả khoảng 19% trước UAV, thậm chí với mục tiêu tương đối lớn có thể cần 3–5 tên lửa và chỉ tiêu diệt được ở cự ly 3–4 km. Dù sau đó Nga nâng cấp Pantsir, phát triển tên lửa cỡ nh…

9 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC18 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

Dơi bay ngợp trời ở Biển Đen #kingkong @putieu

9 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌝🌝 Trí tuệ Pro Mỹ có khác chắc ,nga chắc ko có glonass #bod

9 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC17 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇪🇺🇩🇪 Politico: Kho khí đốt châu Âu xuống mức nguy hiểm, Đức có thể thiếu khí đốt vật lý từ tháng 11 ▪️ Kho khí đốt của Đức hiện chỉ đạt 47%, mức thấp kỷ lục, trong khi trung bình EU là 58%. ▪️ Theo bài báo, vấn đề nằm ở việc Berlin không muốn can thiệp thị trường để yêu cầu các doanh nghiệp nhà nước mua khí đốt với giá cao. ▪️ Đức sở hữu hơn 20% công suất lưu trữ khí đốt của EU, nên nếu nước này thiếu hụt, các quốc g…

9 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC21 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇮🇺🇦 Phần Lan sẽ không đáp ứng yêu cầu của Zelensky. Bộ trưởng Quốc phòng Phần Lan Antti Häkkänen cho biết Helsinki sẽ không chuyển giao tên lửa cho hệ thống phòng không Patriot theo đề nghị của Kyiv. “Chúng tôi không thể gây nguy hiểm cho khả năng sẵn sàng chiến đấu thường trực về phòng không.” Romania, Bulgaria, Hà Lan và Ba Lan trước đó cũng tuyên bố khả năng hỗ trợ quân sự cho Kyiv của họ đã cạn. @puzlevn

9 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Báo Washington Post đưa tin rằng Lầu Năm Góc đã trao cho các công ty quốc phòng 21 ngày để trình bày các ý tưởng về việc mở rộng và tăng tốc sản xuất đạn dược, do nguồn cung đã cạn kiệt do cuộc chiến với Iran. Tuy nhiên, tất cả những mở rộng và tăng tốc này phụ thuộc vào việc Quốc hội thông qua dự luật ngân sách quốc phòng do chính quyền Trump đề xuất, với tổng ngân sách tăng lên 1,15 nghìn tỷ đô la. Và việc thôn…

9 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC16 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Theo Bild, việc Ukraine mất Kramatorsk và Sloviansk sẽ là một trong những thất bại nghiêm trọng nhất của Kyiv trong thời gian dài. Tiền tuyến đang ngày càng áp sát hai thành phố. Nếu kiểm soát được khu vực này, Nga có thể tiếp tục tiến về hướng Dnipropetrovsk và Kharkiv. Cựu phóng viên Bild Julian Röpcke cho rằng quân Nga hiện nắm thế chủ động, đặc biệt quanh Kramatorsk và Sloviansk. @puzlevn

9 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC20 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🇮🇷😂 CNN: Giới lãnh đạo quân sự Mỹ đang tìm cách thoát khỏi chiến tranh với Iran CNN cho biết Dan Caine cùng một số lãnh đạo quân sự Mỹ đang tìm cách kết thúc chiến tranh, vì không kích đơn thuần khó buộc Iran đầu hàng, còn đổ bộ có thể gây thương vong lớn. Mỹ cũng đối mặt với tình trạng hao hụt đạn dược. Rubio, Vance, Caine và Giám đốc CIA John Ratcliffe được cho là đang bàn phương án kết thúc xung đột. Những người…

9 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC18 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

❗️Nga tập kích quy mô lớn vào Odesa trong đêm Trong khoảng 2 giờ, hơn 70 UAV Shahed và 20 tên lửa các loại được phóng vào Odesa và khu vực lân cận. Ít nhất 6 người bị thương, nhiều nhà dân bị hư hại và một số ô tô bị thiêu rụi. @puzlevn

9 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

‼️🇺🇦🇺🇸 Ukraine sẽ không sản xuất tên lửa PAC-3 cho Patriot ngay cả khi được chuyển giao giấy phép ▪️ Nhà phân tích quân sự Ukraine Dmytro Snegiryov cho biết Mỹ đang xem xét khả năng sản xuất tên lửa đánh chặn PAC-3 cho hệ thống Patriot chỉ tại Đức. ▪️ Ngay cả trong trường hợp chuyển giao giấy phép, việc sản xuất tại Ukraine cũng không được lên kế hoạch do nguy cơ các cơ sở sản xuất bị Nga tấn công phá hủy. ▪️ Một lý …

9 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

‼️🇷🇺 Belgorod bị tấn công quy mô lớn, 13 người bị thương, trong đó có 2 trẻ em. ▪️ Bé trai 4 tuổi bị mảnh văng vào ngực, phải nhập viện; bé 9 tuổi và 3 người lớn được sơ cứu tại chỗ. 8 người khác được đưa tới bệnh viện. ▪️ Hơn 4 chung cư, một tòa nhà hành chính cùng một số cơ sở xã hội, thương mại bị hư hại. ▪️ Hai ô tô và một nhà dân bốc cháy sau các vụ nổ. @puzlevn

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @putieu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Cừu Vàng Lông Đỏ
@puzlevn · 22,163
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 September 2026
Trà đá vỉa hè
@tra_da_via_he · 26,545
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 September 2026
Tin nóng chiến sự Nga - Ukraina
@tinnongchiensu · 33,555
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 3 September 2026
Nước Nga nghiêm túc
@Waroftho · 44,913
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
Quán Tin | Kênh Thông tin chính trị quốc tế | Vietnam Information Corner
@quantin · 80,902
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Khỉ Đít Đỏ” (@putieu), 1,919 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/putieu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.