Channel
@pushkingo
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,154subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001376717969 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pushkingo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pushkingo |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @detskosel/32281 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC | @pushkingo/5147 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @detskosel/32352 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC | @pushkingo/5155 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @pushkingo/5159 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC | @detskosel/32383 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC | 1.00 | 11 minutes |
| @detskosel/32507 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC | @pushkingo/5168 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC | 1.00 | 3 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @detskosel | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 5 minutes | @detskosel (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @detskosel. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 2,154 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 2,153 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 2,154 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 2,154 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,793 |
| Reactions total | 390 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
390 reactions across 16 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 17.7% | |
| 🤡 | 46 | 11.8% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5201670536119222964 | 34 | 8.72% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 6.41% | |
| 🙏 | 22 | 5.64% | |
| 🤬 | 20 | 5.13% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 4.87% | |
| custom 5415979839297429987 | 18 | 4.62% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 3.85% | |
| 😭 | 10 | 2.56% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 2.05% | |
| custom 5456638873054486334 | 6 | 1.54% | |
| custom 5273859706480253789 | 5 | 1.28% | |
| custom 5408939743654200531 | 5 | 1.28% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.28% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 1.28% | |
| custom 6246944917449348425 | 4 | 1.03% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 1.03% | |
| custom 5208615751639903398 | 3 | 0.769% | |
| 16 further kinds | 28 | 7.18% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 390reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Путепровод через ж/д линию в составе I этапа Южной широтной магистрали (ЮШМ) — с высоты птичьего полёта. На 95% готов. Весь этот этап ЮШМ (отрезок от Петербургского шоссе до М–11 + реконструкция Подбельского) завершится к концу 2027 года. Это позволит разгрузить переезды, Славянку, Колпинское шоссе + 🛣 увести часть транзитных потоков из Пушкина — за городскую черту.
👍10🙏4🔥2
🚨 Дело Вари Косы 4 августа в Пушкинском райсуде начали рассматривать уголовное дело по ч. 1 ст. 264 УК РФ в отношении Валерия Щурина. Напомним, что 79-летний водитель в марте этого года выехал на встречную полосу на улице Оранжерейной и сбил на остановке маму с 2 девочками. https://t.me/good78news/125866 Суд продолжится 10 октября. Прокуратура вместе с тем ещё и подала иск к обвиняемому о компенсации морального …
🙏16❤2🕊2
Вот это сейчас был прикол. На 20 минут рубануло весь Пушкин ⚡️ Вместе с водой и сотовой связью (МТС как минимум). Все живы? Нас к чему-то готовят?
😭10🤯5⚡3❤2💯2🤨2custom 52086157516399033981
Самый креативный, конечно же 🤡
custom 541597983929742998718🤡12custom 54566388730544863345custom 53210238719340357053👍2🤨1
С каждым днём жить становится у нас всё веселее, особенно с приближением дня выборов. Внезапный массовый исход ⛹️♂️ всех провластных петербургских депутатов изо всех соцсетей сразу — от греха подальше (включая даже Макс). Причина очевидна — страховка, чтоб оппоненты не сняли с выборов через суд, т.к. прецеденты в Петербурге уже созданы. У каждого что-то в закромах и архивах могут найти. https://t.me/fontankaspb/10…
😁13❤1custom 52086157516399033981custom 54566388730544863341
Вечер. Вокзал в Александровской. Тот самый вокзал, что власти отказывались признавать памятником, ссылаясь на отсутствие какой-либо ценности. Однако благодаря упорству и настойчивости активной жительницы Александровской Татьяны Волох, через суд удалось таки добиться восстановления исторический справедливости.
❤31❤🔥10custom 54089397436542005315✍2🤗2🙏2
Рубрика «Хвалим чиновника» https://t.me/detskosel/3242
❤8❤🔥3😁2😎1custom 52738597064802537891
🔤 Детскосельский бульвар, д. 1
❤6👍6😁4🥰2❤🔥1🔥1😍1
Мало того, что трамвай этот не решил глобально проблему даже отдельно Шушар (только частично их разгрузив), так ещё и ушло на это никак не 2.5 года, а целых 8.5!
🤬16💯6😁5👌1
Очередное предвыборное от Беглова (интервью в ТАСС) Оказывается, у жителей Пушкинского района уже не осталось транспортных проблем. Всё решил «подарок» от них в виде трамвая. Подарок — да-да, вы не ослышались. Подарок в полсотни миллиардов бюджетных денег 👍
🤡34🤬4🦄4🍌1👀1👎1💊1😁1
Это было легендарно и феерично! Спасибо ребятам за этот подарок!
custom 52016705361192229648❤5🤝3
Возвращение на родной стадион получилось на славу!
custom 52016705361192229649🔥6custom 62469449174493484252
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pushkingo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 305,683 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гражданин Пушкин 🎩” (@pushkingo), 2,154 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pushkingo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.