https://youtu.be/QVuUiOoo6dI?si=h3m3tia1jxFSzrsf

Channel
Pure World Truth
@pureworldtruth
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,048subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001760973699 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pureworldtruth |
| Created | 1 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pureworldtruth |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 1,048 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 1,045 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 1,045 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.6%
- avg views ÷ 1,048 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 321
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.91%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 April 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,247 |
| Reactions total | 63 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
165 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 56.4% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 13.3% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 7.88% | |
| 🤪 | 10 | 6.06% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 5.45% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 5.45% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 1.82% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.21% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.606% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.606% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.606% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.606% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://youtu.be/Q1LZun4WpkA?si=ukpbN2bfVR3ytiRz
❤3
https://www.instagram.com/p/Dbj-WKMjUQu/?igsh=MWQ0Zmo0NGtmem5xaA==
❤3
His 6 year old daughter had a dream where she saw Mary assumed into heaven. The next morning at breakfast, she casually told her father, “I saw Mary go up into heaven.” There were no dramatic details, no angels, and no extraordinary visions. Just one simple and clear image of Mary going up into heaven. What makes this remarkable is the timing. It happened the day after he had privately prayed for confirmation about …
🙏13❤3
Glory to Jesus Christ! May the Lord bring more Eastern Orthodox in communion with St. Peter 🙏
🔥13❤5
The Church of Lefebvre (aka the SSPX) are truly the most delusional and weirdest schismatics I’ve ever come across. Typically, schismatic groups that break away from the Catholic Church at least acknowledge that they are no longer in communion with Rome. However, the SSPX continue claiming they are still in communion and deceive people into believing the same, despite Rome’s crystal-clear statements about their excom…
❤9🥴3💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8🔥2
https://www.instagram.com/p/DamDsUzDfp9/?igsh=MXA5aHd1ZnMyc2tvOQ==
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
🤣6❤1
Even if the Lefebvrians were right about their interpretation of canon law (they aren’t), they’d still be wrong. The Pope is above canon law, so their excommunication would still be valid and their sacraments (matrimony & penance) would still be invalid. It’s a lose-lose situation for the Lefebvrians. ““The one who hears you hears me, and the one who rejects you rejects me, and the one who rejects me rejects him who…
❤7
https://www.instagram.com/p/Dad1hkADz2d/?igsh=MW82dXNjdW9rdXdxcw==
❤3
Rome has spoken. The matter is finished. I won’t be posting about the SSPX for a long time, nor will I waste any more of my time arguing with Lefebvrians. Rome has already settled the matter for us. Now it’s time to pray for them, leave the rest in God’s hands, and focus on the things that will enrich your soul and draw you closer to Christ and His Church. 🙏🇻🇦✨
❤18🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pureworldtruth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 325,222 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@MalankaraCatholicchurch · 382 postsLegion of Mary
@servantofmary · 7382 postsℂ𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕠𝕝𝕚𝕔 𝔸𝕡𝕠𝕝𝕠𝕘𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕕 ℙ𝕠𝕝𝕖𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕤
@CATHOLICAPOLOGETICSANDPOLEMICS · 2,3751 post𝕻𝖗𝖔𝖙𝖊𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖙-𝖂𝖆𝖙𝖈𝖍™
@protestantwatch · 6451 postThe Catholic Man [TCM]
@thecatholicman · 2871 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pure World Truth” (@pureworldtruth), 1,048 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pureworldtruth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.