Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

бісовський канал з елітною начинкою

@pupyatko

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,198subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001077891178
TypeChannel
Username@pupyatko
Created13 November 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pupyatko

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “бесовской канал с элитной начинкой — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

7,1987,2147,2066 August 2026 — 7,214 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,214 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,209 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,198 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,196–7,216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:127,198-11
9 Aug 2026, 08:517,209-5
6 Aug 2026, 03:167,214no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:247,214first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 7,198 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,830
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held10 (16 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total18,309
Reactions total1,250
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,203 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔60950.6%
56446.9%
🙏231.91%
💋60.499%
😡10.083%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,250reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC≈1,060 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

подобається вибір лавкетс для цього відео, присвяченого міжнародному дню котів бо 1) ну лавкетс 2) згадалось, що зе курва в 22 році випустили благодійний мерч в кольорах українського прапору а сміт ще пушив добірку українських готик/дарквейв/постпанк виконавців з чого вони різко підлетіли по впізнаваності в бендкемп а журнал, який зробив ту добірку завдяки цьому зібрав ще більше донатів які йшли якраз на юнайтед24 -

79💔2

6 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC929 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lichieee

зараз дуже важливо купувати більше книжок. і це певно єдиний раз, коли причина вагоміша за будь-що. новини останніх днів просто жахливі і я досі не знаю як це пережити, бо здається з кожним днем все тільки гірше. постраждало дуже багато видавництв і я впевнена ви вже бачили ці новини. тому просто лишу інформацію про те, як можна підтримати постраждалі видавництва зараз: 🏁 книголав на сайті є багато цікавих передзам

55

4 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈1,320 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026

цікаво, чи зробила вона таки патч з бісовським швайнокарасем :) але вже не дізнаюсь

💔895

4 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC≈2,460 views165 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Загинула Єва 1 серпня 2026 року від повторного удару під час масованого обстрілу Києва, займаючись тим, заради чого і йшла в Госпітальєри в 2022 - рятуючи людей. Дізналась про загибель з посту її подруги. Посестри створили банку допомоги для її мами: send.monobank.ua/jar/5sUhUoAvB7. Можливо, ви бачили колись її коментарі і можете згадати персонально, а навіть якщо й ні то тепер знаєте які круті люди були серед нас.

💔14718

4 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC≈2,080 views134 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Далекої осені 22 року Єва написала мені: "привіт, ми знайомі лише з коментарів в моєму улюбленому мемовому каналі але я йду вже цієї неділі в госпи і пишу до тебе з проханням" - і це був, напевно, самий перший збір на бісовському для конкретної людини з якою я знайома а не просто загально на СОУ. Ми спілкувались вже дуже давно і небагато, писати "привіт, ти жива?" якось глупо (хоча якось я знайшла фотку собаченят на

💔11519

30 Jul 2026, 19:53 UTC≈1,680 views133 reactionsread 12 August 2026

З ряду причин зараз щодня стикаюсь з незнайомими людьми, зокрема - таксистами. Нічні поїздки напрягають трохи бо окрім фактору смертельної втоми ще присутні також фактори: "я їду в нікуди і про моє вбивство дізнається ніхто через два-три місяці" і "одного дня каріний адісіт з Роздільної-сортувальної попросе пояснити за привітання українською і патчі" (жоден зі сценаріїв поки не розігрався але зхрестимо пальці на майб

132💔1

26 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC≈2,010 views256 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

~19 років від крихітного кашиняти яке доводилось вночі буквально витягувати з вуха бо воно туди кладе голову і надто голосно мурчить чим заважає спати до вередливого діда, єдина радість якому на схилі літ була давати собаковому по жепі лапою коли той біжить на кухню. Вороги в житті, сусіди (півтора місяці всього) в смерті. На веселці на ще одного одесита з характером стало більше. 🦋 Скоро побачимось 💜🐱🐶

💔2551

21 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC≈2,300 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

наступну спробу прольоту перегонів в ліфтофф присвячую михайлу васильовичу драпатому

102🙏3

18 Jul 2026, 20:41 UTC≈2,610 views180 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

русоріз має тривати вічність

153🙏20💋6😡1

16 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,860 views47 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ssternenko

Хто обурений – кидайте донат

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @pupyatko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 79,182 of 1,339,933entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“бісовський канал з елітною начинкою” (@pupyatko), 7,198 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pupyatko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.