Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Pupdrone's stash

@pupdrone

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,093subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001673542588
TypeChannel
Username@pupdrone
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pupdrone

Growth

2,0912,0932,0927 August 2026 — 2,091 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,091 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,093 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,092 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,093 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,091–2,093 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:462,093+1
11 Aug 2026, 01:072,092-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:422,093+2
7 Aug 2026, 20:322,091no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:412,091first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.4%
avg views ÷ 2,093 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (9 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,640
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

784 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
41352.7%
❤‍🔥26934.3%
🔥749.44%
😈70.893%
😍70.893%
🥴60.765%
🥰40.51%
👀10.128%
👍10.128%
💘10.128%
😱10.128%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 784reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC694 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

My first time wearing my new collars, did not realize they were this big 😵‍💫 📸 Sharkdrone

28❤‍🔥9🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC916 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Anyways here's DJ Pupdrone, with one hour of beep boop sounds! 🎵 📸 Sharkdrone

31❤‍🔥6👍1

4 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,210 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

In there, please~

🔥309❤‍🔥6😈2😍1

29 Jul 2026, 19:17 UTC≈1,820 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

We took some really nice pics at the rubber furs meet at Awoostria~ 💜 📸 sharkdrone.pet 🦈

🔥2114❤‍🔥6

15 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC≈2,670 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Beep boop! With Sticky Drone

❤‍🔥2114

12 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,760 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Quick catch! 💦

❤‍🔥3817🥴3💘1

9 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC≈2,790 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

o haiii 📸 Sharkdrone

50❤‍🔥13🔥2🥰2😍1

5 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC≈3,020 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Drones! With Sharkdrone

❤‍🔥3618🥰2😍1

27 Jun 2026, 19:35 UTC≈2,690 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://bsky.app/profile/daedricnox.bsky.social/post/3mpc57c7nnk2q

29❤‍🔥2

24 Jun 2026, 20:37 UTC≈3,250 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Thinking of how nice it felt to lie like that at EFM 🤤 🧡🐶 Pup Matic

❤‍🔥4915😍3

22 Jun 2026, 19:37 UTC≈3,230 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Become a droolhound...

❤‍🔥4125🥴3

19 Jun 2026, 19:49 UTC≈1,780 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

What's the drone doing with its dick hanging out like that?

48🔥12❤‍🔥5😈5

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @pupdrone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 654,295 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pupdrone's stash” (@pupdrone), 2,093 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pupdrone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.