gmgn属实是把什么功能都塞进去了 看gmgn的喊单,都不用关注那些kol 一键查看所有的喊单 https://gmgn.ai/?chain=bsc&ref=8CSe26vt
🤓2

Channel
@pumpadd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,136subscribers
-98 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002103619156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pumpadd |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pumpadd |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 3,136 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 3,147 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 3,156 | -10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 3,166 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:55 | 3,170 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 3,176 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 3,180 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 3,190 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 3,200 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 3,209 | -15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 3,224 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 3,227 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 3,234 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 3,234 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 9 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
32 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 40.6% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 28.1% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
gmgn属实是把什么功能都塞进去了 看gmgn的喊单,都不用关注那些kol 一键查看所有的喊单 https://gmgn.ai/?chain=bsc&ref=8CSe26vt
🤓2
gmgn的积分可以抽奖了 https://gmgn.ai/rewards?chain=bsc&ref=8CSe26vt&tab=points
开了个免费ai模型分享的频道 专门分享有各种免费羊毛可以薅的ai网站或者api的活动 https://t.me/freeaimodelfx
👍2
eth的玩法和bsc,sol是完全不一样的 几乎不打新,就把老og币翻出来炒,而且,也不需要你无时无刻盯盘,买入就等着就行了 https://gmgn.ai/?chain=eth&ref=8CSe26vt
每次meme链上热潮的开启,都是来自一场对于踏空的焦虑 一个币莫名其妙被拉的非常高,吸引了很多人的目光,但是绝大多数人根本就没有上车 追进去吧,又觉得现在位置太高了 不去追,又害怕错过下次涨幅 然后就开启了疯狂发币,打新的流程 这个过程就被称作meme牛市
马斯克叙事还是sol比较强 https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/F1ppSHedBsGGwEKH78JVgoqr4xkQHswtsGGLpgM7bCP2
❤1
我憋不住了,兜兜转转又开始玩铭文了是吧
又到了取名大战了是吧 https://x.com/binance/status/2033815600179589416 https://gmgn.ai/?chain=bsc&ref=8CSe26vt
大部分币圈的赌鬼都去 polymarket 玩了 什么是polymarket? 一个概率游戏 通过usdc押注一件事发生的概率 例如 预测比特币将在3月底到达10万 可以押注,yes 或者no yes的概率是30% 买一股是0.3u no的概率是百分之70 买一股是0.7u 在比特币达到10万或者3月底之前,你都可以频繁的进行买入和卖出 甚至一个盘,你可以又猜yes也猜no 最重要的是点对点交易,完全无手续费 https://polymarket.com/
取1万块钱,每天往河里扔1千,扔完内心毫无波澜,你就可以进股市试试了 取10w晚上放到小区垃圾桶里,第二天再去翻,晚上能睡得着的,就可以炒币了
👍9🤔1
年初的行情有点复苏的迹象了 还在送外卖的群友,回归了吗😁 https://gmgn.ai/?chain=bsc&ref=8CSe26vt
👻3🤓2
实话说,今年的牛市和行情并没有如期到来 去年10月到今年3月 这几个月已经是币圈的最后一舞了 很难说,,明年是否还会有去年和前年那种大行情 但是,处于这个市场,能做的只能是等待 币圈的周期本身也都是以年为单位的 没行情的时候,就好好工作,好好生活 最起码要保证,行情到来的时候 你还存活在这个市场,你还有资金 不要提前掉队,才能等到真正的希望
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @pumpadd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“简约DAO CALL” (@pumpadd), 3,136 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pumpadd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.