Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПУЛЬС 27 | НОВОСТИ

Channel

ПУЛЬС 27 | НОВОСТИ

@pulsekhv

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

8,599subscribers

-269 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001775123627
TypeChannel
Username@pulsekhv
Description№ 6980564811 Без воды, без кликбейта, — от аварий и ЧП до решений властей и неожиданных историй из районов. Купить рекламу https://telega.in/c/pulsekhv @PulseKhv_bot - связь с нами. @Pulse_khv - чат Пульса.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pulsekhv

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bigbro_khb/4554812 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC@pulsekhv/9215 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC1.0072 seconds
@bigbro_khb/4568421 Aug 2026, 01:41 UTC@pulsekhv/9246 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC1.002 minutes
@bigbro_khb/470703 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC@pulsekhv/9578 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC1.0045 minutes
@bigbro_khb/4720010 Nov 2026, 03:02 UTC@pulsekhv/9592 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 04:20 UTC1.0077 minutes
@bigbro_khb/471909 Nov 2026, 22:15 UTC@pulsekhv/9593 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 05:40 UTC1.007.4 hours
@exkhv/72983 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC@pulsekhv/9174 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC1.0019 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bigbro_khb14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9912 minutes@bigbro_khb (9–5)
@exkhv13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0019 minutesthis entry (8–5)
@mestoprodv9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutes@mestoprodv (7–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 16 of the 17 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 84 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @exkhv. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,5998,8738,7366 August 2026 — 8,868 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,868 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,866 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,873 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,871 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,873 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,859 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,866 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,856 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,846 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,837 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,827 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,778 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,751 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,736 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,733 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,723 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,703 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,690 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,663 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,645 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,626 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,612 subscribers9 November 2026 — 8,599 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 95 days, net -269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,558–8,914 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 20:318,599-13
6 Nov 2026, 03:498,612-14
2 Nov 2026, 16:568,626-19
31 Oct 2026, 03:278,645-18
27 Oct 2026, 20:268,663-27
24 Oct 2026, 10:168,690-13
20 Oct 2026, 23:458,703-20
17 Oct 2026, 21:188,723-10
15 Oct 2026, 00:588,733-3
12 Oct 2026, 00:388,736-15
5 Oct 2026, 09:598,751-27
27 Sept 2026, 04:368,778-49
17 Sept 2026, 14:588,827-10
13 Sept 2026, 18:188,837-9
9 Sept 2026, 23:188,846-10
5 Sept 2026, 01:008,856-10
29 Aug 2026, 00:268,866+7
25 Aug 2026, 14:458,859-14
18 Aug 2026, 18:528,873+2
15 Aug 2026, 17:148,871first reading

Engagement

91 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.91%
avg views ÷ 8,599 subscribers
Avg views / post
680
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.315%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 91 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held91 (30 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total23,114
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 01:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,100
Videos
≈259
Links
≈306

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 14s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 54 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4122.4%
💩2312.6%
🤬2312.6%
🤯179.29%
😭168.74%
🔥147.65%
😢105.46%
🤡84.37%
👍73.83%
😡63.28%
🤣52.73%
👀21.09%
🥴21.09%
custom 528327387106617010010.546%
❤‍🔥10.546%
🕊10.546%
🗿10.546%
😁10.546%
😍10.546%
😱10.546%
2 further kinds21.09%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (41.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 06:45 UTC253 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Шестеро детей пострадали при пожаре под Хабаровском Самый младший ребёнок, 2023 года рождения, находится в тяжёлом состоянии – его доставили в детскую краевую Пожар был в жилом доме на Советской в посёлке Новостройка района имени Лазо. Дети в возрасте от 3 до 14 лет находились дома одни. Пятеро несовершеннолетних получили лёгкое отравление угарным газом и попали в больницу. Прокуратура организовала проверку и конт…

😢2

11 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC272 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

❗️Горит офисное здание в переулке Гаражном Час назад поступил вызов — пламя было на втором этаже 3-этажного строения. В работе по тушению приняло участие 28 человек и 8 единиц техники. Информация о пострадавших уточняется.

11 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC282 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Любители трогать выпечку голыми руками побеждены

🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 11:32 UTC367 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

Жители поселков на Лазо застряли и оказались в условиях фактической транспортной изоляции Весь летне-осенний период местная грунтовая трасса страдала от тяжелой лесозаготовительной техники и постоянных подтоплений, а пришедшие в Хабаровский край ноябрьские заморозки окончательно добили проезд. Ситуация резко обострилась после того, как малая река Манегин вышла из берегов и полностью затопила проезжую часть. По слов…

10 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTC356 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

МЧС спасли жизни двух геологов в Хабаровском крае Двое геологов оказались заблокированы снежным циклоном в 24 км от посёлка Мухен в Хабаровском крае. Дороги замело, запасы еды заканчивались, а выбраться самостоятельно было практически невозможно. Мужчины бросили свой УАЗ и отправились пешком через тайгу. За 6 часов смогли преодолеть всего 7 километров, пока не добрались до пасеки, откуда попросили о помощи. На выр…

10 Nov 2026, 05:40 UTC367 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

«Сердце болит за детей»: хабаровчане умоляют мэрию очистить единственный путь к лицею 🏫 Жители Краснофлотского района пишут: единственный пешеходный маршрут к Правовому лицею им. Сергея Николенко (школа №11) со стороны улиц Оборонной, Олега Кошевого и микрорайона РЭБ флота превратился в экстремальную полосу препятствий. Родители водят здесь детей уже пятый год — включая подготовительный класс, — и каждую зиму ситуа…

10 Nov 2026, 04:20 UTC360 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

🔥Мировые хиты на струнных инструментах при свете 1000 свечей в Хабаровске! 13 ноября в 19:00 на сцене Хабаровской филармонии виртуозные солисты коллектива «Люмос» @lumos_concerts представят самую популярную программу - «Мировые хиты». Это новое прочтение известнейших композиций поп- и рок-музыки: авторские аранжировки для струнного квартета, объемное, необычное звучание и эмоциональная самоотдача музыкантов. • Bit…

10 Nov 2026, 02:57 UTC389 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

🌊🥶Коммунальный потоп в Южном: дворы на Панфиловцев уходят под воду из-за порыва В Южном утро началось с крупной коммунальной аварии. В районе жилых домов по адресу ул. Панфиловцев, 31 и Панфиловцев, 35 прямо из-под земли забил мощный источник. Поток ледяной воды стремительно заливает дворовые территории и пешеходные зоны, превращая их в настоящие озера посреди ноябрьских заморозков. По словам местных жителей, течь …

9 Nov 2026, 04:47 UTC454 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Отопительный сезон под угрозой: коммунальный беспредел на Суворова, 17А 🥶📄 Жители многоквартирного дома по адресу ул. Суворова, д. 17А бьют тревогу. С мая текущего года управляющая компания ООО «УК «АМУРЛИФТ-ХАБАРОВСК» игнорирует критическое состояние общедомовой системы отопления. Из-за неисправности запирающих устройств на подводке к радиаторам квартиры регулярно затапливает, а сам трубопровод находится в неудовле…

7 Nov 2026, 12:06 UTC609 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Девять человек в одной машине, — в том числе… в багажнике Наши глаза уже, кажется, перестали удивляться, когда из остановленного автомобиля один за другим выходят пассажиры. Но сегодняшняя поездка удивила ответом взрослого. На пути в Хабаровск сотрудники Госавтоинспекции остановили компанию из Дубового Мыса. Подростки в сопровождении двух взрослых ехали гулять в краевую столицу на легковом универсале без номеров. …

❤1

7 Nov 2026, 09:18 UTC540 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

😍Это самое красивое, что мы видели: начало ледостава и сегодняшний закат на Амуре ❤️ — вместо тысячи слов

❤2

6 Nov 2026, 07:34 UTC689 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Самое массовое столкновение на данный момент в Хабаровске Снежное побоище у ЖК «Сторис» парализовало выезд из центра Непогода продолжает провоцировать крупные дорожные инциденты на центральных улицах города. Из-за скользкого покрытия и плохой видимости здесь столкнулись сразу несколько легковых автомобилей и внедорожников. Разбитые машины заняли полосы движения, ведущие по направлению из центра Хабаровска. Ситуаци…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @pulsekhv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @pulsekhv as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
45 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПУЛЬС 27 | НОВОСТИ” (@pulsekhv), 8,599 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pulsekhv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.