Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for پوئبلو

Channel

پوئبلو

@pueblo_philosophy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

63subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002963935992
TypeChannel
Username@pueblo_philosophy
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pueblo_philosophy

Growth

626362.59 August 2026 — 62 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62 subscribers17 August 2026 — 63 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 22:3363+1
10 Aug 2026, 04:1662no change
9 Aug 2026, 04:4862first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.4%
avg views ÷ 63 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 November 20254 August 2026)
Views total66
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4690.2%
👍47.84%
👌11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖋 ژان-لوک ماریون (Jean-Luc Marion) (زاده‌ی 1946)، فیلسوف برجسته‌ی فرانسوی و از شاگردان ژان بوفره و ژاک دریدا، یکی از پیشگامان اصلی «چرخش الهیاتی» در پدیدارشناسی فرانسه به شمار می‌رود. پروژه‌ی فکری او برپایه‌ی فراتر رفتن از متافیزیک سنتی و بازتعریف پدیدارشناسی بر محور مفهوم «دادگی» (Givenness / Donation) استوار است؛ و همین نکته او را به یکی از کانونی‌ترین چهره‌های فلسفه‌ی پوئبلو تبدیل می‌کند. ماریون با نقد شدید سنت فل

2👍1

4 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC34 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ژان-لوک ماریون (Jean-Luc Marion) (زاده‌ی 1946) https://t.me/pueblo_philosophy

2

24 Jun 2026, 12:56 UTC71 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

✍️ لف ایساکوویچ شستوف (1866-1938)، فیلسوف عالی‌قدر و بنیان‌اندیش روس، را نمی‌توان به نحوی موجه از اصحاب فلسفه‌ی پوئبلو دانست، بااین‌همه او اغلب به ژرف‌ترین و خلاق‌ترین شکل به مبانی چنین اندیشه‌ای نزدیک می‌شود. برای نمونه، در این فراز درخشان و شورانگیز از مقاله‌ی «جسارت و فروتنی» که به نقد رادیکال سلطه‌ی ایده و امر ایده‌آل بر اندیشه‌ی بشر می‌پردازد: منبع: Лев Исаа‌кович Шесто‌в, Дерзновения и покорности, "Современные

5

24 Jun 2026, 12:56 UTC70 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ادامه‌ی فرسته قبل👆 "تا آن هنگام که ایده‌ها «ایده‌آل» نگریسته می‌شوند، یعنی در وصف‌شان سرود تحسین و تمجید سر می‌دهند، چنان چیزی ممکن نخواهد شد. بنابراین، پیش از هر چیز، باید ایده‌ها را از آسمان به پایین آورد و بر روی زمین جای داد، آن هم نه بر فراز حرم و معبد، بلکه در بیغوله و سیاه‌چال. در آن هنگام مشکلی نخواهد بود اگر هم ماده به آسمان صعود کند: بگذار آنجا سرگرم باشد. و شاید در آن صورت ایده‌ها که نمی‌خواهند این همسایگی

4

14 May 2026, 21:34 UTC122 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

ظهور یک اگزیستانسیالیسم نامتعارف: نقد گابریل مارسل بر انسان طاغی ✍️ پایان‌نامه‌ی من کوششی است برای بنای یک نظریه‌ی معرفت تاریخی و تاریخ‌نگاری براساس فلسفه‌ی گابریل مارسل. نقد مارسل بر کتاب انسان طاغی (طغیانگر) اثر آلبر کامو، در ضمیمه‌ای یکسر مغفول از کتاب هومو ویاتور (انسان سالک) به‌خوبی نسخه‌ی مارسلی از پدیدارشناسی و اگزیستانسیالیسم را به نمایش می‌گذارد. متن زیر تفسیری بر این مقاله ارائه می‌دهد. از آنجا که این نوشت

4

14 May 2026, 21:25 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

نقد گابریل مارسل بر انسان طاغی (متن فرانسه)

2

18 Feb 2026, 12:46 UTC146 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

📜 میکل دوفرن: «امر محسوس، ابژه‌ای برای لذت در تنهایی نیست؛ بلکه آن چیزی است که از طریقش، یک "جهان" خود را به ما پیشنهاد می‌دهد. حس کردن، یعنی آزمودنِ نوعی "خویشاوندی هستی‌شناختی" با دیگران. سوبژکتیویته هرگز عمیق‌تر از آن زمانی نیست که به "طنینِ یک امر جمعی" بدل می‌شود: از طریق امر محسوس، این یک ملت یا یک دورانِ کامل است که شیوه‌یِ بودنِ خود در جهان را به پیش می‌افکند.» Mikel Dufrenne, Esthétique et Philosophie, To

4

18 Feb 2026, 12:43 UTC114 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

میکل دوفرن (Mikel Dufrenne) (1910-1995)

2

23 Dec 2025, 16:37 UTC146 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔗✉️ نامه‌ی فرانتز روزنتزوایگ به اویگن روزنشتوک (پاره‌ی دوم) 5 سپتامبر 1916 ما همواره تا به امروز در پذیرش این فرم نوعی ضرورت دیده‌ایم. اما چنین عمل‌کردن، به‌معنای چسبیدنِ بی‌چون‌وچرا به پیش‌فرضِ ایده‌آلیستی‌ای بود که مطابق آن در نهایت امر کاملاً به‌سادگی فلسفه برای شناخت ضروری خواهد شد. اگر این مفروض اکنون کنار گذاشته شود- و، برای رضایت شخصی‌ام، متوجه می‌شوم که رشته‌ای را که در نخستین صفحه‌ی این نامه شروع به بافتنش

3

21 Dec 2025, 07:47 UTC111 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖋 یکی از نخستین تظاهرات فهم پدیدارشناسانه-اگزیستانسیالیستی از عالم و آدم یا آن چه تحت عنوان «فلسفه‌ی پوئبلو» معرفی کرده‌ایم، را می‌توانیم در اوایل سده‌ی بیستم و در اندیشه‌ی فرانتز روزنتزوایگ (1886-1929)، متأله و فیلسوف آلمانی، ردیابی کنیم. در جست‌وجوی متنی خصلت‌نما از او، به یکی از نامه‌هایش به دوستش اویگن روزنشتوک، نوشته‌شده در میانه‌ی جنگ جهانی اول، برخوردم. در دو نوبت ترجمه‌اش را در اینجا به اشتراک می‌گذارم: ✉️ ن

2

9 Dec 2025, 07:54 UTC113 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

📜 «آنچه گفته شده، همان است که هست؛ حقیقت با بیانش منطبق است؛ اشیا فلج می‌شوند، هیچ جا سرریز نمی‌کنند؛ همه‌چیز سطح است.» Gabriel Marcel, Le mystère de l'être, livre 1, Association Présence de Gabriel Marcel, 1997, p. 201. * تاکیدها از من است. ✍️ این کلمات کوتاه مارسل، نمایانگر شورشی علیه اصالت گزاره است، میل به استعلایی مادی، اشتیاق به بیرون، به آنچه از کلمات فراتر می‌رود. این یکی از پایه‌های اصلی پوئبلو است. htt

2👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pueblo_philosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 876,034 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پوئبلو” (@pueblo_philosophy), 63 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pueblo_philosophy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.