Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

心理自助与互助

@ptsd_help

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,177subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001177752224
TypeChannel
Username@ptsd_help
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ptsd_help

Growth

2,1752,1772,1766 August 2026 — 2,175 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,176 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,177 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,175–2,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:032,177+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:162,176+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:462,175first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 May 2026, 15:14 UTC991 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

如果你有身体上的慢性疼痛或者精力上的慢性耗竭,我这边有一个小建议:试着多躺下一小段时间。你已经站着或者坐着3-5个小时了?尝试看看你能不能找个地方躺一躺。对我的身体来说,即使是从沙发上靠着变成在床上躺着,感觉也会一下子很不一样。 如果你的身体像我一样长期忍受着酸痛和精力耗竭的痛苦,你对身体的感知可能会变得有些麻木,有时候比较难以察觉到你需要休息的时间。特别的,如果你和我一样还是神经多元谱系人(自闭谱系人、注意力障碍人等等),那你感知自己身体的需求可能会因为身体上的痛苦而变得更加困难。你或许觉得你可能不需要间歇性躺下,但我想尝试一下我的建议还是可能会有用的。 除了间歇性的躺下休息,你还可以试试以下几个小建议:间歇性的坐下看看你是不是需要休息;间歇性暂停你手上的工作看看你是不是需要放松;间歇性吃一点点小零食看看你是不是饿了... source

2

5 May 2026, 15:14 UTC777 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

“我浪费了那些年” —— 朋友,那些年里你可能根本就没有别的选择。 在当时的客观条件和所知信息下,你已经努力做到了最好。过去不能改变,让我们专注当下和将来吧。 source

1

5 May 2026, 15:13 UTC699 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

很多人喜欢把“聪明”看成某种与生俱来的特质,我认为这种想法不对而且很有害。 “聪明”的本质,其实是学习的机会和考察不同视角的意愿。我们不应该把知识看作只有天生“聪明”的人才能拥有的神秘事物。因为获取知识的能力,也就是我们常常说的“聪明”,是任何人都可以自我培养的技能。 source

5 May 2026, 15:13 UTC539 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

这些问题可能会在你挑选心理咨询师的时候有帮助: ❶ 你自己会去接受心理咨询吗? ❷ 你为什么选择成为一名心理咨询师呢? ❸ 你一般会同时接受多少来访者?你现在有几个来访者? ❹ 在什么样的情况下,你会和别人公开我和你讲的事情?如果你会公开,会是什么情况?对方会是谁? ❺ 你可以讲一下你的政治立场吗? source

1

5 May 2026, 15:13 UTC361 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

一个人最基础也是最重要的信念,应该是“我能学习各种不同的知识”。 但让我震惊的是,很多人并没有这种信念,或者认定学习对自己来说是非常困难的事情。 —— 弗兰克·赫伯特,《沙丘》 source

5 May 2026, 15:13 UTC327 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

是的 踏出新的一步会让人害怕 但想象一下 如果你一年后还是留在原地 这样的光阴虚度不会让你害怕吗 source

5 May 2026, 15:13 UTC270 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

是的,交流很重要。但如果在一段感情当中,你需要把每件事情都一再地细致入微地交流,对方才能了解和尊重你的需求,那这种交流模式很可能会给你带来巨大的情感和精力上消耗,甚至让你无法再爱对方。 爱情和亲密关系中很重要的一点是,你需要感受到对方的理解和关心。能够认识到你做各种事情背后的逻辑,以及一定程度上根据你的愿望/需求/感受主动为你做一些事情,这些都是爱的表现。相反,完全无法认识到你做各种事情背后的逻辑,也无法考虑到你的愿望/需求/感受,而是需要你来反复讲述你内心所想的所有细节并安排好你希望对方做的所有事情,很容易让你感觉在这段感情里,对方并不真正认识你,也并不真正爱你。 当然,对方不能读出你所有的心思,你需要和对方更坦诚地交流自己的所思所想。这很有道理。但如果对方连你最基本的一些想法都不能理解,也不会为你的快乐和幸福主动做任何考虑,那这个人真的不是一个很合适的伴侣。 source

5 May 2026, 15:13 UTC229 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

“学习如何接受无聊”对有注意力障碍(ADHD)的人来说非常重要。虽然你失调的多巴胺系统可能不是这么想的,但事实是,生活不仅仅只有精彩的那些部分。你得教会你的大脑接受无聊,让无聊的任务不再感觉像一种折磨。通过让自己感到无聊,你的大脑会慢慢意识到,把所有事情归为“无聊”和“不怎么无聊”并不是正确的分类方法。慢慢地,你会感觉到真正的“精彩”,而不仅仅是“不怎么无聊”。 去触摸花草。去听听你住所附近的各种声音。让你身体的感官接触自然,不仅能降低焦虑,而且能获得一种“我在真实生活”的感觉。 source

1

5 May 2026, 15:12 UTC167 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

你的直觉警铃大作并不代表情况一定很危险,但有一点是肯定的,那就是你的身体和大脑感受到了紧张。尝试真诚地和你的直觉对话,全面地了解你的直觉吧。在这个过程中,你或许会有所收获的。 source

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ptsd_help. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 882,595 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“心理自助与互助” (@ptsd_help), 2,177 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptsd_help.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.