3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,034–1,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 16:56
1,036
+2
9 Aug 2026, 00:53
1,034
-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:16
1,035
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 1,036 subscribers
Avg views / post
206
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held
15 (6 February 2026 – 21 July 2026)
Views total
206
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
151 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50
33.1%
🔥
28
18.5%
👍
23
15.2%
🫡
11
7.28%
😢
9
5.96%
🥴
7
4.64%
🤝
6
3.97%
💯
4
2.65%
😁
4
2.65%
👀
3
1.99%
🤣
2
1.32%
🥰
2
1.32%
⚡
1
0.662%
🦄
1
0.662%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥Приглашаем подписчиков канала на закрытую конференцию «PRO-стройконтроль: итоги года»!
Специально подписчиков нашего канала мы выделили несколько мест на Всероссийскую конференцию «PRO-стройконтроль: итоги года», которая пройдет 11 сентября в Москве.
Это событие закрытое — билеты не поступают в открытую продажу. У вас есть уникальная возможность попасть в число участников и лично пообщаться с ведущими экспертами о…
Может ли экспертиза заменить подрядчику документы?
Не могу не поделиться размышлениями по делу, которое сейчас в активной фазе рассмотрения 😅
Фактура довольно банальна. Заказчик отказался от договора из-за просрочки. Подрядчик направил акт что выполнил все работы.
А дальше судебная классика: подрядчик требует взыскать задолженность, заказчик во встречном иске требует вернуть неотработанный аванс.
Но есть деталь, …
27 марта 2026 г. был точно запоминающимся ☺️
Утром выступала на форуме Актион Строительство «PRO-стройконтроль 2026: Рабочие решения для объектов», а вечером отстаивала интересы подрядчика в игровом судебном процессе на Юридическом саммите лидеров строительной отрасли (это было очень смешно, обязательно поделюсь видео) 🙏
Теперь про строительный контроль! Интересно, что этот договор почти всегда воспринимается как т…
PRO-строй контроль 2026: благодарность за диалог на высшем уровне 🏗️
В прошлую пятницу мы провели шикарную конференцию «PRO-строй контроль 2026: рабочие решения для объектов» . Мероприятие прошло в закрытом формате для подписчиков системы «Строительство» (Актион) и это позволило нам создать по-настоящему рабочую атмосферу, где каждый вопрос был услышан♥️
Главная ценность этого дня — люди и экспертиза. Мы гордимся т…
⚡️ Мы знаем, вы ждали этого! ⚡️
📢 Актион Строительство запускает вторую ежегодную премию «Лучший инженер в строительстве — 2026». 🚀
💰 Призовой фонд — 500 000 рублей:
1️⃣ место — 🥇 250 000 ₽
2️⃣ место — 🥈 150 000 ₽
3️⃣ место — 🥉 100 000 ₽
Регистрация в конкурсе ➡️ по ссылке
💡 Почему стоит участвовать?
— Это вызов самому себе: пройти три этапа (тесты, решение практических кейсов, проектная работа) и получить новые…
Восемь уровней качества: кому выгодны новые правила приемки квартир
➡️С 1 марта 2026 года с правом досрочного применения на российском рынке жилья вступает в силу ГОСТ «Отделочные работы. Требования к результатам работ» (Р 72509-2026). Документ, утвержденный Росстандартом, впервые вводит единую систему классов отделки, которая детально описывает, каким именно должен быть ремонт от застройщика.
«Прозрачные методы пр…
Завтра 1 марта, а значит, вступают
новые требования к членам СРО (можно посмотреть в записи), а также вступает в действие ряд нормативных документов, в том числе, значимый для отрасли стандарт ГОСТ Р 72509-2026 «Отделочные работы.
Требования к результатам работ»
Комментарии по этому стандарту от вице-президента НОСТРОЙ ниже ⬇️ ⬇️⬇️
Вашему вниманию пункт 12.
Чего ходить вокруг да около.
Инженера ПТО тоже в НРС?)
С 01.03.2026 ожидаем расширения НРС. Теперь в них будут включаться не только ГИП/ГАП, но и «иные специалисты, занятые в строительстве». Перечень должностей и требования к квалификации этих специалистов будут устанавливаться правилами саморегулирования.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
👍4😢4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @pto_onlineengineerss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 946,063 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПТО онлайн” (@pto_onlineengineerss), 1,036 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pto_onlineengineerss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
