Channel
@ptcprotocol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12,288subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002558903612 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ptcprotocol |
| Description | Welcome to the Trillion Dollar Ai Economy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ptcprotocol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 12,288 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 12,300 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 12,307 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 12,308 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 12,322 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 12,326 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 12,330 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (30 April 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 581 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 THE PROMPT PROTOCOL — ECOSYSTEM UPGRADE 🚀 GM Prompt fam! 👋 We've been hard at work behind the scenes, and today we're excited to share a major upgrade to the heart of our ecosystem: the Prompt word library. 💎 What's new We've begun swapping out obsolete, rarely-used words and replacing them with high-value, culturally powerful words the world actually searches for and wants to own — think BITCOIN, TIME, GUCCI, N…
📖 Proverbs 4:23 · WEB Guard what you want, because your roadmap will quietly follow it. ——— 中文 📖 箴言 4:23 · WEB 要看守你所渴望的，因为你的路线图会悄然随它而行。
——— 中文 💚 The Prompt Protocol · 早间简报 💚 8月12日 星期三 AI 融资工程越来越像结构化信贷，同时 Gemini 与 ChatGPT 一同迈入十亿用户俱乐部，地缘政治依旧不断插足。 1. 英伟达提议以 GPU 作抵押，撬动 5000 亿美元 AI 融资 黄仁勋希望放贷方把 GPU 视作长周期抵押物，为算力扩建释放 5000 亿美元债务；悬而未决的问题是折旧速度，尤其是在中国芯片可能加快这条曲线的情况下。华尔街大体认可这一思路，也就意味着下一轮 AI 周期很大程度押注于「今天的芯片能保值」这一假设。 CNBC · 商业 2. Gemini 月活突破 10 亿 Sundar Pichai 表示 Gemini 是 Google 史上增长最快的产品，在十亿用户这一门槛上与 ChatGPT 并肩；63% 的用户通过语音交互，该应用每天生成 1.5 亿张图片。事实证明，Google 的决定性优势是…
💚 The Prompt Protocol · Morning Brief 💚 Wednesday, 12 August AI financing engineering is starting to look like structured credit, while Gemini joins ChatGPT in the billion-user club and geopolitics keeps intruding. 1. Nvidia pitches GPUs as collateral for $500B in AI financing Jensen Huang wants lenders to treat GPUs as long-lived collateral to unlock half a trillion in debt for the build-out; the open question is …
📖 Proverbs 4:7 · WEB Pay for the lesson now; ignorance charges interest later.
💚 The Prompt Protocol · Morning Brief 💚 Tuesday, 11 August Capital is stacking up behind AI compute while the political and security bills start arriving. 1. Nvidia lines up $500B in financing, pitches GPUs as collateral Jensen Huang told CNBC that broadly adopted, transferable hardware means lenders can underwrite compute as a revenue-generating asset — a framing that turns GPUs into financeable infrastructure and…
Dear The Prompt Protocol Community, As our community grows, we want to make absolutely clear where official information about The Prompt Protocol comes from — and where it does not. The ONLY official sources of information about The Prompt Protocol are: 🌐 Website: www.thepromptprotocol.ai 🐦 X / Twitter: @ptcprotocol ✈️ Telegram: Community (https://t.me/+6hpg2stR_5g3YzU1) and Channel (https://t.me/ptcprotocol) 📩 Em…
The Prompt Protocol Official Channel pinned «📣 Official Launch Announcement 🚀 3 August 2026 🌐 Feature Updates for The Prompt Protocol Official Website: ⚡️ 1. Node Activation Officially Launched: Node Activation is now fully operational. Users can now become a Linguistic Node Owner and Operator. To…»
📣 Official Launch Announcement 🚀 3 August 2026 🌐 Feature Updates for The Prompt Protocol Official Website: ⚡️ 1. Node Activation Officially Launched: Node Activation is now fully operational. Users can now become a Linguistic Node Owner and Operator. To activate your lingusitic node, you will need to own 1 NFT + 10,000 PTC + Answer 10 Ground-Truth Questions. 🧬 2. DNA Score Introduced: We have launched the DNA Scor…
❤2
The Prompt Protocol Podcast Series Episode 1: AI Needs Us, Humans. We are launching a podcast series that discusses many important concepts about our project. Spend time to listen and understand more!
Whitelisting Q&A Question 1: What is the purpose of this Whitelisting Program? Answer: It allows faithful and early adopters of our project a chance to lock-in their cost of acquiring a Prompt ("Word") NFT and 10,000 PTC at 200 USDT. Once we launch officially, the price of a Prompt ("Word") NFT and PTC will fluctuate higher or lower depending on the market forces. In addition, participants of the whitelisting progr…
❤1
Hello Prompties! Our Whitelist Event will end on 25 July 2026! We will officially launch shortly after that. Product development is going along well! We are excited and we hope you are too. Thank you for your continued support and faith in the project! Cheers, The Prompt Protocol Team
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ptcprotocol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 485,887 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ptcprotocol named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Prompt Protocol Official Channel” (@ptcprotocol), 12,288 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptcprotocol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.