Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Николаева Мария/ ПСИХОЛОГ PPT

@psyzametka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

56subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002578626149
TypeChannel
Username@psyzametka
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psyzametka

Growth

565756.57 August 2026 — 57 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57 subscribers14 August 2026 — 56 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:2856-1
10 Aug 2026, 07:0157no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:3357first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 11 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥5630.4%
custom 51975913136204125195429.3%
😍2413.0%
💯137.07%
🙏115.98%
custom 519715528424555679073.80%
custom 519753931874632743573.80%
🕊52.72%
custom 537999306853346641742.17%
🤣31.63%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC43 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что я делаю, когда клиент написал, что не придёт🧖‍♀️

custom 51975913136204125197🤣2

24 Jun 2026, 09:34 UTC72 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В моем случае это про сомнения видимо, отсутствие надежды? Извинитесь👍

❤‍🔥4🙏1custom 53799930685334664171

24 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC66 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я в кафе или в магазине всегда беру один и тот же салат, десерт и тд.. ‎Потому что я это пробовала, я в этом уверенна. Я уверенна что мне будет вкусно. ‎Этот вкус для меня не станет сюрпризом, он понятен и знаком. ‎ ‎И вот интересно, когда мы так цепляемся за привычное, что даже в еде (там где точно, казалось бы, безопасно) мы не имеем смелости попробовать новое - это про опору на себя и уверенность в своем выборе ил

❤‍🔥7custom 53799930685334664172

11 Jun 2026, 11:25 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Коська входит в чат.

❤‍🔥7😍4🤣1

5 Jun 2026, 23:30 UTC95 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

"Оказывается, всю жизнь это не я топал, а ваш пол скрипел." Андрей Айрапетов Комики иногда выдают классные мысли)

💯6❤‍🔥5😍3

5 Jun 2026, 09:34 UTC88 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

В этом году третья школа для коллег, которую я готовлю и мне это приносит удовольствие. Позаботиться о том, чтобы было место для того, чтобы все собрались вместе и погрелись друг о друга. Я, когда училась в школе, под руководством педагога организовала союз школьных организаций. Была там президентом, президентом класса и школы и мне это тоже нравилось. Я много где и кем была. Школьный период вообще был про людей.

❤‍🔥8custom 51975913136204125194💯2

2 Jun 2026, 12:08 UTC70 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Поездка домой - это напоминание о том, что детство закончилось так давно и то что было, где-то там и осталось. ‎Остро ощущается течение времени. Но, где красиво там красиво)

custom 51975913136204125199❤‍🔥3😍3

28 May 2026, 22:45 UTC82 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😍11❤‍🔥2

28 May 2026, 22:44 UTC76 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

‎я поняла, почему мне тяжело оставаться здесь надолго и я периодически убегаю. ‎ ‎маркетологи суют долженствования о том, что в блоге психолог должен выдавать полезный контент. ‎нужны тексты, давящие на боли клиента. ‎нужно как-то по особенному позиционировать себя, как специалиста. ‎писать то, что покажет экспертность. ‎ ‎очень много надо, какие-то обязательства (на которые я не подписывалась) у психолога перед чита

❤‍🔥11🙏1

8 Mar 2026, 10:02 UTC116 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @balance_pptPhoto

С 8 марта, девочки, девушки, женщины☀️ С днём независимости женщин!📖

🕊3😍3custom 51975913136204125191

26 Feb 2026, 02:12 UTC141 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

И актер хороший, и слова важные . ‎ ‎Кажется, тут про собственную ценность, про возможность выбирать себя и чувствовать себя в этом полноценным. И чтобы этого было достаточно. ‎ ‎Чтобы не нужны были извне подтверждения того, что со мной все в порядке. ‎ ‎Если уходят, то это не со мной что-то не так (привет, стыд), это просто выбор человека.

custom 519759131362041251911🕊2custom 51975393187463274351

24 Feb 2026, 06:25 UTC124 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Стыд бывает таким всепоглощающим, что за ним сложно ухватить какие-то другие чувства. ‎ ‎Заметить, что я испытываю радость, просто грусть сложнее, если огромным забором стыд стоит перед глазами. ‎ ‎Перманентно стыдиться сложно и невыносимо, но бывает, что привыкаешь. ‎Привыкаешь к тому, что это твоя база. И тогда особенно важно замечать, что за ним еще что-то стоит, какие-то ещё эмоции, реакции. ‎ ‎Сложно, но возможн

🙏5custom 51971552842455567903❤‍🔥1custom 53799930685334664171

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @psyzametka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Feb 2026, 04:47 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

WhatsApp совсем помер, чем вы пользуетесь? Нужно, кажется, куда-то переезжать, vpn не вывозит.

  1. VK11%
  2. Max30%
  3. Пока телега81%
  4. Всё еще WhatsApp19%

The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 11 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,301,557 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Николаева Мария/ ПСИХОЛОГ PPT” (@psyzametka), 56 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyzametka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.