Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Коля Белкин

@psyterror_incident

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

86subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003084242147
TypeChannel
Username@psyterror_incident
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/psyterror_incident

Growth

867 August 2026 — 86 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 16:1786no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:3286first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3525.9%
💯1914.1%
🔥1813.3%
🏆107.41%
🙏96.67%
😁75.19%
👍64.44%
53.70%
😈42.96%
❤‍🔥32.22%
🐳32.22%
👏32.22%
💅21.48%
💋21.48%
😭21.48%
🥰21.48%
👎10.741%
😍10.741%
😱10.741%
🤝10.741%
1 further kind10.741%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 26 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
97.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
218
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 26 March 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

26 Mar 2026, 10:39 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @trap_gitlers

Книги я люблю книги и фильмы мне энтересны фильмы и книги

💅2

20 Mar 2026, 05:45 UTC528 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Один из лучших треков Тейпа, Биг Бейби Тейпа — баиле-фанк-фонк в жанре баварской мазурки. Теперь это любимый трек Васи Говнада. #фрешмены

😈4❤‍🔥1

10 Mar 2026, 13:32 UTC190 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В отличие от твоих, у моих есть яички...

🔥31

10 Mar 2026, 13:29 UTC175 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Всë проще, Даниил. У меня тоже есть птички...

1

10 Mar 2026, 13:29 UTC123 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @trap_gitlers

Всё чëтко во истину, только вот, дескоть, не припомню у Окси такие басяцкие во истину строчки.

1

10 Mar 2026, 11:56 UTC549 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Взглянем на личность Вячеслава Коммунистической Партии Советского Союза под призмой: якобы, он представляет из себя Артиста, хотя на деле спускается в комментарии к нам, смердам, которые какие-то там статейки пишут, марают тг своими постами, ну мы конечно же просвещаем неразумный народ и несем учение сваги в массы, даём пастве необходимые знания о саундклауд рэпере Скалли, но Слава — это же совершенно другой, казалос

3🔥3

10 Mar 2026, 11:42 UTC152 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

И нам, так называемым скотам хм-хм-хм из комментариев, Слава посвящает часовые диспуты простыней на комментариях, не щадя своё драгоценное время. Забавно, просто, знаете, забавно.

3

10 Mar 2026, 11:41 UTC103 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @antihype_kpssPhoto

типа это же обычный скот долбоеб из комментов. какой это муз журналист?

1

5 Feb 2026, 17:36 UTC238 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Какой ваш любимый трек на колонках? Мой — the Bluetooth device is ready to pair.

💯8🔥4🙏2

5 Feb 2026, 17:32 UTC472 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Видали? Я молодёжный. Стикер. Рилс. Свага.

💯3🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @psyterror_incident. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Коля Белкин” (@psyterror_incident), 86 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyterror_incident.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.