Рассказываем о психологии просто, чтобы вам было легко разобраться в себе
💜 2 в 1: онлайн-сессии + чат с психологом — 87% наших клиентов видят результат благодаря такому формату
———
Всего одно касание к ментальному здоровью 👇
psypsy.online/tg
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
14 measurements spanning 18 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,670–10,766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 04:08
10,681
-3
24 Aug 2026, 01:34
10,684
-9
22 Aug 2026, 08:35
10,693
-2
20 Aug 2026, 00:16
10,695
-2
18 Aug 2026, 22:49
10,697
-8
17 Aug 2026, 20:27
10,705
-8
15 Aug 2026, 16:06
10,713
-11
14 Aug 2026, 02:05
10,724
-11
11 Aug 2026, 16:33
10,735
-8
10 Aug 2026, 13:44
10,743
-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:34
10,745
-4
8 Aug 2026, 18:56
10,749
-4
7 Aug 2026, 17:06
10,753
-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:32
10,755
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.32%
avg views ÷ 10,681 subscribers
Avg views / post
354
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
18 (1 August 2026 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
6,378
Reactions total
89
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,540
Videos
≈134
Links
≈648
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
89 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
68
76.4%
👍
16
18.0%
🔥
3
3.37%
💘
2
2.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как внедрить привычку без насилия над собой 👆
Знакомая картина: вы загораетесь идеей делать зарядку, учить язык или ложиться вовремя. Первые три дня все идет отлично. На пятый — вы находите оправдание. На десятый — напрочь забываете о своем обещании, а внутри поселяется противное чувство: «Опять у меня не хватило силы воли».
Спойлер: сила воли здесь вообще ни при чем.
Наш мозг — ленивый консерватор. Его главная за…
🕒 Если вы постоянно говорите «не успеваю» — этот пост для вас
Чувство нехватки времени редко возникает на пустом месте. Чаще всего за ним скрываются сильная усталость, страх сделать что-то неидеально или тяжелое чувство вины. Когда внутренний ресурс на нуле, психика включает защиту, и мы автоматически откладываем то, что действительно ценно: качественный отдых, любимые увлечения, общение с близкими или заботу о себе…
Фильмы для романтического вечера могут не только настроить на уют — они действуют как зеркала ваших отношений: показывают потребности, страхи, стили привязанности и способы коммуникации.
💘 Выбирайте фильм, который отвечает вашему текущему эмоциональному запросу: иногда нужно поплакать вместе, иногда посмеяться, иногда — поговорить.
➖➖➖➖➖➖
📱 Пишите свои варианты в комментариях: какие фильмы вы добавили бы в идеальны…
Это тяжелая ситуация, и ваши чувства — тревога, печаль, обида, страх — понятны. Когда желание родить сталкивается с противоположной позицией партнера, важнее всего — не оставаться один на один с этим напряжением и не принимать поспешных решений под давлением эмоций.
Что стоит понять сначала:
👆 Причины «нет» у партнера могут быть очень разными: страхи (финансовые, ответственности), травмы из прошлого, сомнения в отн…
Рождение ребенка — одно из самых сильных событий в жизни пары. Но парадокс в том, что вместе с радостью оно почти неизбежно приносит и фазу отдаления. С точки зрения психологии, первый год жизни малыша — это нормативный кризис отношений. Внимание обоих взрослых полностью переключается на ребенка: распорядок, кормления, ночи без сна, забота о безопасности. В этом контексте легко почувствовать себя уже не «любимым чело…
12 ежедневных практик, чтобы не потерять любовь в родительстве 💘
Появление ребенка — невероятная радость и огромная перестройка: меньше сна, больше забот, меньше времени на отношения. Романтика приобретает новый формат, и это нормально. В карточках мы написали практические инструменты, которые помогут сохранить и развивать близость даже в плотном режиме родительства ⬆️
Основные принципы:
⚪️ Примите реальность: лю…
The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Мы часто едим не потому, что голодны, а потому что хотим заглушить какое‑то состояние.
Ниже 5 эмоций, которые мы «заедаем», и простые способы работать с каждой из них:
1️⃣ Скука
Еда — легкий способ заполнить пустоту и получить небольшое «развлечение».
Как работать: делайте паузу 5–10 минут и замените привычку: короткая прогулка, мини‑задача (убрать 1 вещь, помыть кружку), позвонить другу. Ведите список «быстрых дел…
Тело просит энергии или эмоции просят утешения? 😕
Вы открываете холодильник, хотя поели час назад. Рука сама тянется к шоколадке после тяжелого звонка. Знакомая ситуация? Часто мы путаем потребность организма в топливе с попыткой психики справиться со стрессом. Подробнее смотрите в карточках ⬆️
Что делать в момент сомнения:
1️⃣ Пауза 5–10 минут. Выпейте стакан воды, сделайте дыхание по схеме 4-7-8 (вдох на 4 счета…
Что сложнее всего: перестать контролировать себя и научиться слышать свое тело или поддерживать эмоции без еды❔
Контролировать еду57%
Справляться с эмоциями не едой50%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ограничения в еде от контроля к компульсивности
Нам часто запрещали конфеты, контролировали количество сахара и следили за порциями. Нам хотели добра, но...
😢 Запрет делал лакомства сверхценными. Ребенок ел украдкой, прятал печенье или объедался, пока никто не видел.
😢 Контроль мешал научиться чувствовать свой организм. Дети теряли связь с сигналами голода и насыщения.
😢 Появлялся пищевой стыд. Конфеты ассоциировал…
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @psypsyonline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что сложнее всего: перестать контролировать себя и научиться слышать свое тело или поддерживать эмоции без еды❔
Контролировать еду57%
Справляться с эмоциями не едой50%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,425,296 of 1,602,868entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PsyPsy — психолог онлайн” (@psypsyonline), 10,681 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psypsyonline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.