Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PsyPsy — психолог онлайн

Channel

PsyPsy — психолог онлайн

@psypsyonline

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,681subscribers

-74 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001300399008
TypeChannel
Username@psypsyonline
DescriptionРассказываем о психологии просто, чтобы вам было легко разобраться в себе 💜 2 в 1: онлайн-сессии + чат с психологом — 87% наших клиентов видят результат благодаря такому формату ——— Всего одно касание к ментальному здоровью 👇 psypsy.online/tg
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psypsyonline

Growth

10,68110,75510,7187 August 2026 — 10,755 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,753 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,749 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,745 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,743 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,735 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,724 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,713 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,705 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,697 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,695 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,693 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,684 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,681 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 18 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,670–10,766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 04:0810,681-3
24 Aug 2026, 01:3410,684-9
22 Aug 2026, 08:3510,693-2
20 Aug 2026, 00:1610,695-2
18 Aug 2026, 22:4910,697-8
17 Aug 2026, 20:2710,705-8
15 Aug 2026, 16:0610,713-11
14 Aug 2026, 02:0510,724-11
11 Aug 2026, 16:3310,735-8
10 Aug 2026, 13:4410,743-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:3410,745-4
8 Aug 2026, 18:5610,749-4
7 Aug 2026, 17:0610,753-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:3210,755first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.32%
avg views ÷ 10,681 subscribers
Avg views / post
354
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held18 (1 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total6,378
Reactions total89
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,540
Videos
134
Links
648

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

89 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6876.4%
👍1618.0%
🔥33.37%
💘22.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC166 views7 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Как внедрить привычку без насилия над собой 👆 Знакомая картина: вы загораетесь идеей делать зарядку, учить язык или ложиться вовремя. Первые три дня все идет отлично. На пятый — вы находите оправдание. На десятый — напрочь забываете о своем обещании, а внутри поселяется противное чувство: «Опять у меня не хватило силы воли». Спойлер: сила воли здесь вообще ни при чем. Наш мозг — ленивый консерватор. Его главная за

4👍3

24 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC224 views7 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🕒 Если вы постоянно говорите «не успеваю» — этот пост для вас Чувство нехватки времени редко возникает на пустом месте. Чаще всего за ним скрываются сильная усталость, страх сделать что-то неидеально или тяжелое чувство вины. Когда внутренний ресурс на нуле, психика включает защиту, и мы автоматически откладываем то, что действительно ценно: качественный отдых, любимые увлечения, общение с близкими или заботу о себе

7

22 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC271 views5 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Фильмы для романтического вечера могут не только настроить на уют — они действуют как зеркала ваших отношений: показывают потребности, страхи, стили привязанности и способы коммуникации. 💘 Выбирайте фильм, который отвечает вашему текущему эмоциональному запросу: иногда нужно поплакать вместе, иногда посмеяться, иногда — поговорить. ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📱 Пишите свои варианты в комментариях: какие фильмы вы добавили бы в идеальны

3👍2

20 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC355 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Это тяжелая ситуация, и ваши чувства — тревога, печаль, обида, страх — понятны. Когда желание родить сталкивается с противоположной позицией партнера, важнее всего — не оставаться один на один с этим напряжением и не принимать поспешных решений под давлением эмоций. Что стоит понять сначала: 👆 Причины «нет» у партнера могут быть очень разными: страхи (финансовые, ответственности), травмы из прошлого, сомнения в отн

1🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC400 viewsread 25 August 2026
Poll

На какой стадии ваша пара?

  1. 1-20%
  2. 3-425%
  3. 5-675%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC407 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Рождение ребенка — одно из самых сильных событий в жизни пары. Но парадокс в том, что вместе с радостью оно почти неизбежно приносит и фазу отдаления. С точки зрения психологии, первый год жизни малыша — это нормативный кризис отношений. Внимание обоих взрослых полностью переключается на ребенка: распорядок, кормления, ночи без сна, забота о безопасности. В этом контексте легко почувствовать себя уже не «любимым чело

3👍1

17 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC384 views6 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

12 ежедневных практик, чтобы не потерять любовь в родительстве 💘 Появление ребенка — невероятная радость и огромная перестройка: меньше сна, больше забот, меньше времени на отношения. Романтика приобретает новый формат, и это нормально. В карточках мы написали практические инструменты, которые помогут сохранить и развивать близость даже в плотном режиме родительства ⬆️ Основные принципы: ⚪️ Примите реальность: лю

5👍1

15 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC403 viewsread 24 August 2026
Poll

🤔 Когда вы чаще всего тянетесь за едой?

  1. 1️⃣ Скука39%
  2. 2️⃣ Усталость35%
  3. 3️⃣ За компанию26%
  4. 4️⃣ Тревога/стресс57%
  5. 5️⃣ Грусть/одиночество33%

The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC402 views4 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Мы часто едим не потому, что голодны, а потому что хотим заглушить какое‑то состояние. Ниже 5 эмоций, которые мы «заедаем», и простые способы работать с каждой из них: 1️⃣ Скука Еда — легкий способ заполнить пустоту и получить небольшое «развлечение». Как работать: делайте паузу 5–10 минут и замените привычку: короткая прогулка, мини‑задача (убрать 1 вещь, помыть кружку), позвонить другу. Ведите список «быстрых дел

2🔥2

13 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC362 views7 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Тело просит энергии или эмоции просят утешения? 😕 Вы открываете холодильник, хотя поели час назад. Рука сама тянется к шоколадке после тяжелого звонка. Знакомая ситуация? Часто мы путаем потребность организма в топливе с попыткой психики справиться со стрессом. Подробнее смотрите в карточках ⬆️ Что делать в момент сомнения: 1️⃣ Пауза 5–10 минут. Выпейте стакан воды, сделайте дыхание по схеме 4-7-8 (вдох на 4 счета

3👍3💘1

11 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC376 viewsread 21 August 2026
Poll

Что сложнее всего: перестать контролировать себя и научиться слышать свое тело или поддерживать эмоции без еды❔

  1. Контролировать еду57%
  2. Справляться с эмоциями не едой50%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC354 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ограничения в еде от контроля к компульсивности Нам часто запрещали конфеты, контролировали количество сахара и следили за порциями. Нам хотели добра, но... 😢 Запрет делал лакомства сверхценными. Ребенок ел украдкой, прятал печенье или объедался, пока никто не видел. 😢 Контроль мешал научиться чувствовать свой организм. Дети теряли связь с сигналами голода и насыщения. 😢 Появлялся пищевой стыд. Конфеты ассоциировал

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @psypsyonline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

На какой стадии ваша пара?

  1. 1-20%
  2. 3-425%
  3. 5-675%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTCAnonymous Poll46 voters

🤔 Когда вы чаще всего тянетесь за едой?

  1. 1️⃣ Скука39%
  2. 2️⃣ Усталость35%
  3. 3️⃣ За компанию26%
  4. 4️⃣ Тревога/стресс57%
  5. 5️⃣ Грусть/одиночество33%

The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

Что сложнее всего: перестать контролировать себя и научиться слышать свое тело или поддерживать эмоции без еды❔

  1. Контролировать еду57%
  2. Справляться с эмоциями не едой50%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,425,296 of 1,602,868entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PsyPsy — психолог онлайн” (@psypsyonline), 10,681 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psypsyonline.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.