Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PsyPharm

@psypharmacor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

638subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002384402915
TypeChannel
Username@psypharmacor
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psypharmacor

Growth

638639638.57 August 2026 — 639 subscribers8 August 2026 — 639 subscribers14 August 2026 — 638 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 638–639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:06638-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:49639no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:33639first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.2%
avg views ÷ 638 subscribers
Avg views / post
365
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held20 (20 June 202628 July 2026)
Views total3,285
Reactions total119
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9643.4%
🔥4922.2%
👍3314.9%
167.24%
🙏114.98%
❤‍🔥73.17%
🤯31.36%
🌚10.452%
👌10.452%
💋10.452%
😭10.452%
🤔10.452%
🤩10.452%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC250 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⏺🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠⏺ Что же такое кайф от дофамина ? Если собрать всё вместе, аккуратная формулировка выглядит так. ❤️Дофамин не производит гедонический сигнал, за чистое «нравится» отвечают опиоидно-эндоканнабиноидные горячие точки. ❤️Но он производит нечто, что субъективно переживается как удовольствие особого рода: чувство растущей ожидаемой ценности, положительную ошибку предсказания, приписывающую миру мотивационную ярко

8🔥6👍3

28 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC228 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠 🔠У дофаминовых рецепторов разная чувствительность🔠 D1 Низкоаффинные рецепторы почти игнорируют ровный тонический фон и «включаются» именно на резких фазовых пиках. ❤️Крутой градиент это момент, когда фазовый сигнал резко перекрывает тонический шум, отношение сигнал/шум подскакивает, и цепи научения получают предельно чёткое «вот оно, вот прямо сейчас» ❤️Отсюда, почему вещества и инженерно быстрые стимулы

5👍43🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC263 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠 Феноменология дофаминового пика: Это не мягкое опиоидное блаженство, не разморенность, а заряженность, ощущение мощи, важности. «всё имеет смысл, всё захватывает, хочется действовать». Это хотение в чистом, зашкаливающем виде: мотивационный огонь, а не гедонистическое тепло. Люди маркируют его как удовольствие, потому что одержимость моментом и захваченность субъективно неотличимы от «очень хорошо» и«кай

6🔥52

25 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC334 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠 🤩🤩Тоника и фаза: два режима работы дофамина🤩🤩🤩 Прежде чем идти дальше, важно дополнить знания про два режима в которых дофамин выделяется. 🤩🤩Тонический уровень➖фоновый дофамин. Он капает постоянно, как из неплотно закрытого крана, и задаёт общий тонус: настроение в течение дня, энергию, готовность встать с дивана. Это не «неважный фон» а именно тонический дофамин отвечает за напор (или как это в литературе

👍116🔥31

24 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC386 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔡🔡🔡🔡 🔡🔡 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠 хотение и ошибка в предсказании. Если дофамин не про удовольствие, а про «хочу» и «могу» от чего же с него так хорошо ? Есть распространённая интуиция в поп культуре, дофаминовый сигнал💣 удовольствие. Почему по механизму это всё-таки не совсем так. Хотение и удовольствие это две разные системы Ключевое разделение здесь принадлежит Кенту Берриджу: wanting (хотение) и liking (собствен

11🔥72

23 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC365 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️ в ближайшие дни большой разбор, на несколько постов, ответа на вопрос: Если дофамин не про удовольствие, а про «хочу» и «могу» от чего же с него так хорошо ⬜️⬜️ Чем отличаются зависимости ⬜️ И чём различия, так называемого, "плохого" и "хорошего" дофамина ⬜️

🙏115

21 Jul 2026, 03:44 UTC410 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @famousmb1

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Масик) (@masik_cherry) 2. 💎 ETH (@madRADload) 3. ddl_error (@ddl_error) 4. KTNV (@M_KTNV) 5. Cтäc (@stas_kg) ✔️Проверить результаты

73🤯3🤩1😭1

18 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC482 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @famousmb1Photo

Очередной биохакерский подгон для тех, кто хочет выйти этим летом из порочного круга на новый уровень жизни ☀️ : 1) 🍄 Грибник 66 это авторские продукты и знакомые грибы выращенные на необычных субстратах раскрывающие эффект по новому От него целых 3️⃣ набора трёх грибов для мощного буста! 2) Psy_Pharm объединяет академическую глубину, доступный научпоп и практические советы без лишней воды. 🧬 Он в этот раз дарит ку

👍1

17 Jul 2026, 06:07 UTC567 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Н-холинорецепторы в мозге (Оригинал взят отсюда https://t.me/pspbgmu_pharma/698)

🔥3

16 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC629 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💣💣 здоровых добровольцев прошли ПЭТ дважды: на плацебо и на амфетамине Treadway et al., 2012. Логика метода такая: 💣в кровь вводят меченую молекулу, которая садится на дофаминовые рецепторы D2/D3. Чем больше собственного дофамина мозг выбросит под амфетамином, тем сильнее этот дофамин вытеснит метку с рецепторов. Величина вытеснения и есть индивидуальная мера отзывчивости дофаминовой системы. Тонкость, которая всё

9❤‍🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC≈2,420 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👀ДОФАМИН, УСИЛИЕ и ПОРОГ «ОНО ТОГО СТОИТ» Самый живучий нейромиф последних двадцати лет, уравнение «дофамин = удовольствие». Из него растут все эти разговоры про «дофаминовый детокс», «передозировку удовольствием от телефона», «воздержание» и прочее (как же они зае). Проблема в том, что на уровне системы это почти неверно. Первым это заметил Кент Берридж и, по собственному признанию, сам был удивлён результатом. У

15🔥93👌1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psypharmacor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 147,187 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PsyPharm” (@psypharmacor), 638 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psypharmacor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.