Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психологическая газета

Channel

Психологическая газета

@psygazeta

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,134subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001698668010
TypeChannel
Username@psygazeta
DescriptionПрофессиональное интернет-издание о достижениях современной психологии для психологов и широкого круга читателей www.psy.su https://max.ru/psy_su
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/psygazeta

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0587,1407,0996 August 2026 — 7,077 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,077 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,071 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,069 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,070 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,063 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,071 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,067 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,063 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,058 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,064 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,070 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,083 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,090 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,097 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,124 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,117 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,126 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,135 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,140 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,133 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,134 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,132 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,130 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,132 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,137 subscribers11 November 2026 — 7,134 subscribers7,1346 August 202611 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,046–7,152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 11:397,134-3
7 Nov 2026, 08:167,137+5
4 Nov 2026, 18:267,132+2
2 Nov 2026, 04:117,130-2
30 Oct 2026, 03:567,132-2
27 Oct 2026, 11:477,134+1
24 Oct 2026, 13:187,133-7
21 Oct 2026, 07:287,140+5
18 Oct 2026, 03:307,135+9
14 Oct 2026, 20:457,126+9
11 Oct 2026, 23:227,117-7
5 Oct 2026, 10:577,124+27
27 Sept 2026, 12:377,097+7
18 Sept 2026, 01:007,090+7
13 Sept 2026, 16:577,083+13
9 Sept 2026, 13:227,070+6
3 Sept 2026, 20:177,064+6
31 Aug 2026, 22:077,058-5
28 Aug 2026, 13:137,063-4
25 Aug 2026, 12:227,067first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 7,134 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held46 (15 May 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total8,416
Reactions total144
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,470
Videos
≈6
Links
≈1,460

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

733 reactions across 44 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤37651.3%
👍7510.2%
🔥7410.1%
💔476.41%
🤬253.41%
😱233.14%
🤔223.00%
😁172.32%
👎131.77%
👀101.36%
😢81.09%
💘60.819%
💯60.819%
🤡60.819%
🥱60.819%
👏50.682%
🎉30.409%
🙏30.409%
❤‍🔥20.273%
🌚20.273%
3 further kinds40.546%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 733 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 09:36 UTC646 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

И.Ю. Млодик о детской травле «Стоит бить тревогу, если ребенок демонстрирует подавленное настроение, частые болезни, как способ не ходить в школу, активное нежелание ходить в школу, снижение успеваемости, плохой сон, повышенную тревожность, неспособность себя защитить даже перед домашними, резкие вспышки гнева и раздражения на более слабых близких, жалобы на собственную ничтожность. Если ребенок ничего плохого о шк…

❤15👍8

6 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC≈1,290 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Комитет под руководством Н.А. Останиной продолжает работу над законом о психологах 3 ноября Комитет Государственной Думы по защите семьи, вопросам отцовства, материнства и детства провел заседание рабочей группы на тему «Об основах регулирования психологической деятельности в Российской Федерации». Темой для обсуждения стали замечания Правительства РФ к тексту законопроекта «Об основах регулирования психологической…

❤12👎11🥱2👍1🤡1

5 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,160 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Коллективная память и образ будущего страны Т.А. Нестик: «На примере конструирования образа будущего России в условиях начавшегося военного конфликта и беспрецедентных экономических санкций нами было показано, что социальный оптимизм и оценка будущего страны опираются на поиск личностью исторических аналогий происходящих событий. Таким образом, участвуя в символическом совладании членов группы с кризисными ситуациям…

❤10

29 Oct 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,720 views26 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

25 тысяч педагогов-психологов не хватает системе образования в России Около 25 тысяч педагогов-психологов не хватает системе образования в России. Об этом сообщили ТАСС эксперты Центра экономики непрерывного образования (ЦЭНО) Президентской академии. «Особую тревогу экспертов вызывает острый дефицит педагогов-психологов и растущая перегрузка учителей, приводящая к оттоку молодых специалистов из профессии. По данным…

😁15👀7🌚2❤1🤔1

26 Oct 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,870 views35 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

В Госдуму внесли законопроект о налоговом вычете за оплату услуг психолога «Проект дополняет статью 219 Налогового кодекса РФ. Предлагается установить социальный налоговый вычет за расходы на оплату услуг психологов для налогоплательщика и членов его семьи. Право на вычет предоставляется, если лицо, оказывающее услуги, осуществляет деятельность в области психического здоровья, а также соответствует квалификационным …

❤20💘5🤡5🔥3👍2

22 Oct 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,730 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Счастье, деятельность, развитие: к вершинной психологии «Люди могут по-разному относиться к себе и к своим желаниям, и в соответствии с этим возможны две стратегии достижения счастья: игра на повышение и игра на понижение. Самый простой способ быть счастливым — это ограничить свои желания, не обязательно в количественном, но хотя бы в качественном отношении, сведя их к деньгам, сексу и успеху. Но это счастье другого…

❤15🔥5👍2🙏1

11 Oct 2026, 13:56 UTC≈2,210 views38 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

А.Ю. Кузнецова: законопроект о психологической помощи могут внести в Госдуму в ближайшее время Законопроект о психологической помощи гражданам был поддержан профессиональным сообществом и может быть внесен на рассмотрение Госдумы в ближайшее время, рассказала РИА Новости вице-спикер Госдумы Анна Кузнецова. По ее словам, ранее законопроект был однозначно поддержан психологическим сообществом, по предмету него идет и…

🤔18❤9🥱4👀3👍2👎2

8 Oct 2026, 08:58 UTC≈2,080 views9 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

В.А. Петровский о рецензиях ИИ: Искусственный или Сверхъестественный? «Вместо рассуждений об ИИ (не решаюсь включать бытовые приборы, чтобы очередной раз услышать, что думает естественный интеллект об искусственном), хочу привести только один пример работы большой языковой модели, решавшей отнюдь не школьную задачу с ответом в конце учебника. Я извлек семь стихотворений из своей книги стихов "Вне возраста" и предлож…

👍6❤3

5 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC≈3,700 views45 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Обращение к психологам России и СНГ в День учителя А.Г. Асмолов предлагает включить в галерею Бессмертных «Психологической газеты» отцов-основателей первых в СССР факультетов психологии, а также предлагает выпускникам факультетов поделиться своими воспоминаниями об Учителях… «2026 год — год 60-летия Рождения Психологии в Советском Союзе в двух крупнейших университетах страны. В 1966 году благодаря титаническим усил…

❤26🔥14👏5

2 Oct 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,730 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Сопереживание как центральная категория понимающей психотерапии «Мы различаем три динамических плана осуществления работы переживания — план непосредственного переживания, план выражения и план осмысления [Василюк 2005]. Процессы, относящиеся ко всем трем планам, соприсутствуют и взаимодействуют друг с другом, у каждого из них есть свое предназначение, своя незаменимая роль в целостной работе переживания. В плане н…

❤10🤔1

30 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC≈3,480 views15 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

А.Г. Асмолов: образы детства в историях и сказках «Не счесть произведений, авторы которых проецировали свои мировоззренческие установки на миры детства и подросткового возраста. В этих описаниях вы, дорогие мои взрослые, почти не найдете нейтральных оттенков. Они колеблются меж двух полюсов — белого и чёрного; светлого полюса Идеализации Детства и темновато-мрачного полюса Демонизации Детства. Детство предстает пере…

❤15

25 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC≈1,630 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Техника работы со стульями в психотерапии вообще и в когнитивно-поведенческой психотерапии в частности «Широко известная и применяемая во множестве форм психотерапии техника работы со стульями первоначально была предложена Якобом Моренов созданном им подходе групповой психотерапии, психодрамы и социометрии. Такой простой и доступный инструмент, как стул, широко используется в множестве общих и специальных методах пс…

🔥3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @psygazeta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа
@Inpsycho · 31,315
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Библиотека психолога
@psy_b00k · 21,881
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
Татьяна Черниговская
@tvchernigovskya · 111,032
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Открытые курсы СПб ИДПО для психологов и психотерапевтов
@spb_idpo · 27,546
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психологическая газета” (@psygazeta), 7,134 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psygazeta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.