Публикую отзывы и сердечко вырывается из груди, как птичка🥰
❤2

Channel
@psyforadults
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
149subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002150835466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psyforadults |
| Created | Between 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psyforadults |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 149 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 148 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 148 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (1 July 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,175 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
86 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 54.7% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 26.7% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 9.30% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 4.65% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.49% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Публикую отзывы и сердечко вырывается из груди, как птичка🥰
❤2
Всё! Я тотал квалифайт, бичезззз😎 3000 часов, ееееее 🤑
🔥7❤4
Каждый отзыв даёт мне заряд для улучшения своих занятий🥰 Благодарю каждого❤️
🔥5
Спасибо, мои прекрасные🥰 Практикум позади - и мне хочется немного побыть с этим, прежде чем бежать дальше. Как психологу и телесному терапевту мне было важно увидеть своими глазами то, о чём обычно я узнаю только из слов клиенток на сессиях: как быстро тело откликается, когда ему дают разрешение. Как за три часа меняется мысль, взгляд, то, как человек занимает пространство в комнате. Это тот момент, ради которого ст…
🔥1
💃 субботний Бурлеск pomp💅 Телесно - ориентированный Бурлеск УЖЕ ЗАВТРА😍 И в 15:00 мы встречаемся в зале - и я уже чувствую предвкушение. Что нас ждёт: 💃 живой, тёплый вайб - без оценивающих взглядов, только поддержка; 💃 10 шагов, в которых тело будет узнавать себя заново - от устойчивой стойки до взгляда, который не прячется; 💃 хорошее настроение и, вероятно, смех - тело редко обходится без него, когда расслабляет…
🔥2
Что вы упустите, если пропустите ЭТОТ практикум Очевидная причина, я на долгий срок уезжаю во Владивосток - бытовые дела, всё надо решить. Ещё одна причина - подобные практикумы у меня не про "поток". Это не конвейер марафонов, которые повторяются каждый месяц. "10 шагов к себе" - авторская работа, в которой психология, телесно-ориентированный подход и бурлеск встретились впервые, и сложились в конкретную структуру.…
❤2
Adult intimacy lab pinned a photo
И сразу давайте посмотрим, что в английском есть из аналогичного: Чаще всего используются: - soft BDSM / light BDSM - самый прямой и понятный вариант. "Soft" или "light" указывает на отсутствие жёстких практик (сильной боли, серьёзных ограничений). - kink-lite - разговорный термин. Означает человека, который интересуется кинками, но умеренно, почти как хобби. - dabbler - иногда с лёгким пренебрежением (но не обязат…
❤3
Кстати, занятное. Таня хорошо описала феномен пренебрежения. Меня до сих пор царапает снисходительное "не Тру"💔 а уж "Бархатухи", это что за колхоз😂
❤3
Узнала, что среди БДСМ-щиков есть термин бархатухи, которым они называют "бархатных бдсмщиков", т.е. тех, кто практикуют что-то из БДСМ, но делают это на каком-то самом лайтовом, не-трушном уровне (простите мне мой французский, но мне захотелось объяснить под стать самому термину 😂). Используется этот термин, как правило, насмешливо и уничижительно. Чем-то похоже на термин ваниль, который отсылает к "ванильному сексу…
🤣4
Если вы забыли, что значит нравиться себе Знакомо? Смотришь в зеркало - и первое, что видишь, это то, что не так. Разговариваешь с телом только языком критики: подтянуть, спрятать, исправить. Даже наедине с собой ловишь себя на мысли "не хочу, чтобы меня видели такой". Это не про лень и не про "просто полюби себя больше". Это про то, что где-то по дороге тело перестало быть домом - и стало объектом постоянной прове…
🔥2❤1
Как бурлеск научил меня занимать место Много лет назад я впервые вышла на сцену в бурлеск-номере. Тогда я не думала ни о психологии, ни о теле как о территории терапии - я просто хотела почувствовать себя красивой и немного посмелее, чем обычно. Но что-то в этом жанре зацепило меня по-настоящему. Не перья и не корсеты (это д пытка вообще😂) - а то, что происходило внутри, когда я разрешала себе быть увиденной. Харизм…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @psyforadults. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 189,694 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Adult intimacy lab” (@psyforadults), 149 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyforadults.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.