Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

رسانۀ روان‌سی‌نمایی

@psycin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,165subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001274216437
TypeChannel
Username@psycin
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psycin

Growth

4,1654,1714,1685 August 2026 — 4,171 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,171 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,169 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,165 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,164–4,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:214,165-4
9 Aug 2026, 11:314,169-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:164,171no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:154,171first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 57m
Average length
59m 20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1932.2%
👏1016.9%
❤‍🔥813.6%
🤔610.2%
😱46.78%
👍35.08%
🔥35.08%
👌23.39%
😡23.39%
😁11.69%
🤷‍♂11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2023 to 17 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2025, 14:36 UTC≈1,750 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

7

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

28 May 2025, 11:32 UTC≈3,090 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎞 روان‌کاوی 💠 #لکان_تلویزیون؛ ویدئوی کامل ♻️ ترجمه: محمد پورفر ⭐️ با استفاده از متن ویراستاری شدۀ ژاک آلن میلر @PSYCIN ✨ رسانۀ روان‌سی‌نمایی

8👏5

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

23 Apr 2024, 08:27 UTC≈3,600 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

And here we go again We've taken it to the end With every waking moment We face this silent torment I'd sacrifice I'd sacrifice myself to you Right here tonight 'Cause you know that I love you Sacrifice I'd sacrifice myself to you Right here tonight 'Cause you know that I love you Darkness Is all I want to see I could never put into words What is it you mean to me I'd sacrifice I'd sacrifice myself to you Right h

❤‍🔥8👌1

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

3 Feb 2024, 14:06 UTC≈3,480 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Der Lauf der Dinge (The way things go)

👏2🤔2👌1

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

24 Jan 2024, 08:45 UTC≈3,590 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔰 دوست داشتن آنچه در چشم توست ✍️ #لکان؛ #رابطۀ_ابژه ♨️ شما از پیش با این ابژۀ احتمالاً خیالی به شیوه‌ای که در تجربۀ تحلیل به نمایش در می‌آید آشنایی دارید. برای ‏متوقف کردن تصورات‌تان درباره‌اش، من دو نمونه آورده‌ام که گفتم رویشان متمرگز می‌شوم: فوبیا و فتیش.‏ ♨️ در اشتباه خواهید بود اگر باور کنید این ابژه‌ها از پیش رازشان را برملا کرده‌اند. برعکس. صرف نظر از تمرین، ‏آکروبات، ژیمناستیک، پیدایش خیالی، که مردم خودشان

😱3🔥1

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

1 Jan 2024, 13:34 UTC≈2,880 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔰 بی‌نیاز از یک رابطۀ ابژه ✍️ #لکان؛ #رابطۀ_ابژه ♨️ این نوشته شده: پیش‌تناسلی‌ها آدم‌هایی هستند با «خود»هایی که [...] ضعیف‌اند. برای آنها انسجام «خود» ‏انحصاراً به استحکام روابط ابژه با یک ابژۀ چشمگیر وابسته است.‌‎ ‎این همان‌جایی است که ما می‌توانیم سؤال ‏بپرسیم. بعداٌ شاید ببینیم این مفهوم فاقد توضیح از یک ابژۀ چشمگیر در دیگر متون به کجا رهنمون می‌شود، به ‏عبارتی فقدان مطلق تمایزگذاری و تفکیک دربارۀ آنچه چشمگیر است

🤔4

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

24 Dec 2023, 17:03 UTC≈2,360 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

پیگیری کدام مطلب را در کانال ترجیح می‌دهید؟

  1. در حال حاضر هیچ مطلبی15%
  2. سمینار «رابطۀ ابژه» لکان14%
  3. سمینار «اخلاقیات» لکان6%
  4. سمینار «انتقال» لکان6%
  5. سمینار «بنیادین‌ها» لکان7%
  6. سمینار «دگرباره؛ جنسیت زنانه، محدودیت‌های عشق و دانش»7%
  7. مقالۀ «کاوش هراس یک پسرک پنج‌ساله (هانس)» فروید4%
  8. مقالۀ «یادواره‌ای از دوران کودکی لئوناردو داوینچی» فروید8%
  9. مشاهدۀ نتایج34%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1🤷‍♂1😱1

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

11 Dec 2023, 15:32 UTC≈2,280 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔰 ژوئیسانس «دیگری» نشانۀ عشق نیست ✍️ #لکان؛ #سمینار_بیست ♨️ ژوئیسانس «دیگری،» دیگری بزرگ درون گیومه، «تن دیگری که دیگری بزرگ را نمادین می‌کند، نشانۀ عشق نیست.» ♨️ من آن را می‌نویسم، ولی پشتش نمی‌نویسم «پایان»، «آمین»، یا «چنین باد.» البته که عشق شامل یک نشانه می‌شود، و همواره دوسویه است. ♻️ ترجمه: محمد پورفر ⚡️ Lacan – Encore On Feminine Sexuality, The limits of Love and Knowledge ⚡️ لکان، دگرباره دربارۀ تن‌آمیز

👏3🔥1😡1

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

8 Dec 2023, 13:36 UTC≈2,120 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

چه پیشوندی را برای واژه «زیستن» در ایران درخور کاربردتر می‌دانید؟

  1. خوشبختی زیستن2%
  2. شادکامی زیستن0%
  3. معنای زیستن11%
  4. انتظار زیستن13%
  5. دلخوشی زیستن2%
  6. رنج زیستن23%
  7. دردمندی زیستن7%
  8. فاجعهٔ زیستن17%
  9. شکنجهٔ زیستن10%
  10. مشاهدهٔ نتایج15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😡1

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

26 Oct 2023, 16:55 UTC≈1,090 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍1🔥1

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

24 Oct 2023, 14:00 UTC954 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔰 خاموش! #راهبر_آغازماهان؛ تکۀ ۶ ✍️ #فیلم‌کاوی #لینچ #لکان؛ روان‌کاوی ۶ ♨️ ولی ژرف‌آهنگ همگان [JA] که شناسا [$] به این شیوه از آن بی‌بهره مانده، به «دگرۀ همانندسازی» [(i(a] واگذار شده که آن را مانند ژرف‌آهنگ یک نمایش می‌پندارد: ریزنگرانه نمایش پدیدآمده به دست شناسا در گودال، با همیاری همه‌سویۀ برخی از جانوران درندۀ راستین [R]، در بیشتر زمان‌ها به دست آمده به تاوان آنها، شناسا دلاوریِ ورزش‌های تراز بالایی را پی می‌گی

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

19 Oct 2023, 21:14 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔰 چیزی به نام پیوند تن‌آمیزی وجود ندارد ✍️ #لکان؛ #سمینار_بیست ♨️ آنچه شالودۀ زندگی را تشکیل می‌دهد، این است که تمام چیزهایی که به روابط بین زن و مرد مربوط می‌شوند، آنچه اشتراک‌پذیری نام می‌گیرد، درست کار نمی‌کند. درست کار نمی‌کند و همۀ دنیا هم در موردش حرف می‌زنند، و بخش عمده‌ای از فعالیت ما هم صرف گفتن همین حرف می‌شود. ♨️ این شامل این حقیقت هم می‌شود که این پیوند، این پیوند تن‌آمیزی، تا زمانی که درست کار نمی‌کند،

Signed Mohammad Pourfar

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psycin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Dec 2023, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll136 voters

پیگیری کدام مطلب را در کانال ترجیح می‌دهید؟

  1. در حال حاضر هیچ مطلبی15%
  2. سمینار «رابطۀ ابژه» لکان14%
  3. سمینار «اخلاقیات» لکان6%
  4. سمینار «انتقال» لکان6%
  5. سمینار «بنیادین‌ها» لکان7%
  6. سمینار «دگرباره؛ جنسیت زنانه، محدودیت‌های عشق و دانش»7%
  7. مقالۀ «کاوش هراس یک پسرک پنج‌ساله (هانس)» فروید4%
  8. مقالۀ «یادواره‌ای از دوران کودکی لئوناردو داوینچی» فروید8%
  9. مشاهدۀ نتایج34%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Dec 2023, 13:36 UTCAnonymous Poll212 voters

چه پیشوندی را برای واژه «زیستن» در ایران درخور کاربردتر می‌دانید؟

  1. خوشبختی زیستن2%
  2. شادکامی زیستن0%
  3. معنای زیستن11%
  4. انتظار زیستن13%
  5. دلخوشی زیستن2%
  6. رنج زیستن23%
  7. دردمندی زیستن7%
  8. فاجعهٔ زیستن17%
  9. شکنجهٔ زیستن10%
  10. مشاهدهٔ نتایج15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2023 to 17 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,022,813 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رسانۀ روان‌سی‌نمایی” (@psycin), 4,165 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psycin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.