Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mind reading book l course

Channel

Mind reading book l course

@psychologymindreadingbook

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,695subscribers

+118 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002257874107
TypeChannel
Username@psychologymindreadingbook
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psychologymindreadingbook

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5771,6951,6367 August 2026 — 1,577 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,577 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,581 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,615 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,627 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,629 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,635 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,647 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,658 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,666 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,673 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,690 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,695 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,559–1,713 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:591,695+5
14 Sept 2026, 12:561,690+17
10 Sept 2026, 16:571,673+7
2 Sept 2026, 06:221,666+8
30 Aug 2026, 05:071,658+11
27 Aug 2026, 14:111,647+12
24 Aug 2026, 21:141,635+6
21 Aug 2026, 01:031,629+2
18 Aug 2026, 10:541,627+12
15 Aug 2026, 16:461,615+22
12 Aug 2026, 01:021,593+12
8 Aug 2026, 16:021,581+4
7 Aug 2026, 21:181,577no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:221,577first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

165 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15895.8%
👍42.42%
❤‍🔥21.21%
🤗10.606%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC251 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Confusion is a tactic 🤐 Mixed signals. Hot and cold. You start overthinking. That’s the trap. Try this: Ignore words. Watch patterns. Clarity is consistent. Confusion is control.

3

4 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC314 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The most effective influence doesn’t feel like pressure. It feels like your own decision. You pick the restaurant with the line outside. You rush when you see “Only 2 spots left.” You answer a few questions, and the conversation ends up exactly where the other person wanted it to go. PSYHORISE breaks down the psychology behind all three, with practical insights from a negotiator at Meta. Here you’ll learn how to

6

3 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC269 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ebooksstores1Video

📚 WELCOME TO READING MINDSET 📚 💰 One copy of Rich Dad Poor Dad can cost around ₹269. Or... 🔥 Get access to 5,000+ best-selling books for nearly the same price. You have only 2 choices: ❌ Choice 1: Keep buying one book at a time and spend thousands every year. ✅ Choice 2: Unlock a library of 5,000+ books on Self-Improvement, Business, Finance, Psychology, Success, Mindset, Marketing, and more—all in one place.

2

31 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC464 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 The Psychology of Attachment 🧠💔 Sometimes you are not attached to the person... You are attached to the feeling they gave you. The late-night conversations. The attention. The memories. The hope of what it could become. That's why letting go can feel difficult. Your brain misses the emotional connection it created. But remember: Missing someone doesn't always mean they are good for you. Look at the whole st

9

30 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC469 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 The Psychology of Attraction 🧠❤️ People are not attracted only by looks. The way you make someone feel matters more. Confidence creates attraction. Kindness creates connection. Emotional stability creates trust. Chasing someone constantly can reduce your value in their eyes because attraction needs mutual interest. Don't try to become someone else to be chosen. Build yourself... And the right people will app

9

29 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC499 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 Why We Miss Someone Who Hurt Us 💔 Sometimes you don't miss the person... You miss the memories. Your brain remembers the good moments, the attention, the excitement, and the connection. That's why you may miss someone who wasn't always good for you. The heart remembers feelings... But the mind must remember patterns. Don't only ask: "Do I miss them?" Ask: "Did they bring peace into my life?" 🧠 Psychology

7

28 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC512 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 The Psychology of Love ❤️ Love is not just about strong feelings. In the beginning, emotions are high. You think about them constantly, every message feels special, and everything seems perfect. But real love is tested after the excitement fades. Do they respect you? Do they communicate honestly? Do they make effort when things get difficult? Attraction may start a connection... But trust, consistency, and un

9

27 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC543 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 When Someone Is Using You 🎭 Some people don't like you... They like what you provide. Your attention. Your time. Your support. Your energy. They appear when they need something... But disappear when you need them. They enjoy your effort... But don't match it. Never ignore this pattern: If someone only values what you give, they may not value you. Real connection is not one-sided. It's built on respect, e

12

26 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC561 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 Become Emotionally Unbreakable 🖤 Don't let someone's mood control your day. Don't let someone's opinion define your worth. Master your emotions. Master your reactions. The person who controls themselves controls their life.

7👍2

25 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC623 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 The Human Behavior Rule 🧠 People treat you based on what you allow. If you accept disrespect repeatedly... Some people learn they can continue. Your standards teach others how to treat you.

7

24 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC656 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 The Communication Test 💬 A healthy person explains. An unhealthy pattern creates confusion. Good communication solves problems. Silence and games create distance. Choose clarity over guessing.

7

18 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC921 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 Watch Actions, Not Words 👀 Words can create illusions. Anyone can promise. Anyone can apologize. But repeated actions reveal the truth. Patterns never lie.

10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psychologymindreadingbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mind reading book l course” (@psychologymindreadingbook), 1,695 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychologymindreadingbook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.