Channel
@psychologiesi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,544subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001602295667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psychologiesi |
| Description | Psychology and more.. For ad @j33ry_co Dear subscribers, the channel administration is not responsible for advertising! By being in the channel, you agree to this automatically Buy in telega.io/channels/psychologiesi/card?r=JRSRn_i6 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psychologiesi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 13,544 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 13,545 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 13,550 | -18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 13,568 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 13,574 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 13,575 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 13,577 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (3 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,024 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
106 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 64.2% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 18.9% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 7.55% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 3.77% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Scientists have found that stroking your partner’s hand strengthens the relationship and makes the couple happier. Fifty-five couples participated in the experiment. They were shown negative images, and then one partner stroked the other’s hand. As a result, the person’s mood improved by 40–50%, even if the couple was in the middle of an argument. Moreover, only touch from a loved one helped—not from a stranger. I…
👍1🔥1
Depression and anxiety are transmitted through kissing - study. Scientists have analyzed almost 2000 couples and found that depression and anxiety are contagious - they can be "picked up" from a partner through kissing. Already in six months "transmitted" symptoms can be found in a healthy person who met with a depressed partner. The fact is that frequent kissing changes the composition of bacteria in the oral cav…
❤5🤯3
💵 $15,000 with $150 in mouth of trading! 💱 Over the course of a four-week trading marathon, she grew her capital from $150 to $15,000 What’s her secret? “Lisa trades every day using her own unique method.” She posts trading signals for free on her channel. New challenge ⏺Start: $70 ⏺Goal: $7,000 ⏺Duration: approximately two weeks. ➡️ Join now and get started—there won’t be a second chance ↘️ https://t.me/+_9NtZj…
Stop. Watch. Listen A technique to help you deal with overreactivity. The technique is as follows: - Stop. As soon as you begin to feel the emotions building up, you need to give your mind a time-out. If possible, physically remove yourself from the situation or confrontation that triggered it. - Watch. Try to assess the situation from the outside and ask yourself if you are reacting reasonably or hypertrophied. …
❤3
#ADVERTISEMENT 👇
❤1
One in two office workers has sex at the office—survey results. 47% admitted to having sex right at their workplace, most often on office desks. Another 28% said they had an orgasm there. Office workers believe that sex helps relieve stress, boost productivity, and improve well-being. And for Zoom users, office sex has become one of the most popular categories of porn. Join us for more -> @psychologiesi 💡
❤6
Stupid employees are more likely than others to become managers, according to Forbes. Such people come across as “one of the gang,” speak with confidence, and rarely doubt their decisions. In addition, they overestimate their own abilities, fail to recognize the complexity of tasks, and therefore take on virtually any job without hesitation. Join 👉🏼 EARLIEST OF ALL ▶️ Add all our news channels
❤2👍2
Porn Leads to Depression — A Large-Scale Study. Scientists observed nearly 3,000 people over two years and found that the more severe the addiction to pornography, the higher the risk of depressive symptoms. This link was found in both men and women. Age and attitudes toward pornography had no effect on the results. Join us for more -> @psychologiesi 💡
❤4🤔2👍1
Scientists have declared that a “sex epidemic” has swept the entire planet due to the World Cup. Researchers have observed that men’s libido spikes sharply after their favorite teams win. They become more open to intimacy—both with long-term partners and with casual acquaintances. During the celebrations, people drink, have fun, and are more willing to socialize. Some even travel to other cities to cheer on their t…
❤3👍2🤔2
Men love their exes for the rest of their lives—so say psychologists. Sixty percent of guys have “the one” after whom no other relationship seems quite as exciting. Guys idealize past relationships, forget all the negativity, and start feeling nostalgic. For women, it works a little differently: they don’t dwell on relationships that didn’t work out, but rather on the time and energy they spent on “the wrong person…
👍6❤1🤔1
Laziness is the key to success: Fortune writes that the most successful billionaires aren't workaholics, they just don't do extra. Bezos delegates, Musk leaves boring calls, Zuckerberg bans long rallies, and Duolingo and Amazon hire not for intelligence but for attitude. The key is to want to get to the top, but not to climb there head-on. Join us for more -> @psychologiesi 💡
❤4👍3🤔2
5 signs that you need rest 1. You are constantly sick. Important events cause stress that exhausts the body. In anticipation of a busy week, try to get enough sleep and eat right. 2. Worried about the past. During the day you recall failures and mishaps. The brain tends to concentrate on the negative when you feel maximum stress. 3. you don't take care of yourself. If you skip lunches to finish work, or cancel doc…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @psychologiesi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 299,268 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Psychology 💡” (@psychologiesi), 13,544 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychologiesi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.