Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психология №31

Channel

Психология №31

@psy_school_tg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,351subscribers

-326 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002654139575
TypeChannel
Username@psy_school_tg
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psy_school_tg

Growth

14,35114,67714,5147 August 2026 — 14,677 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,677 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,674 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,653 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,635 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,617 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,595 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,573 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,542 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,513 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,481 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,469 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,449 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,433 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,421 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,398 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,351 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -326. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,302–14,726 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 06:5714,351-47
22 Aug 2026, 12:2514,398-23
21 Aug 2026, 06:0714,421-12
20 Aug 2026, 09:2214,433-16
19 Aug 2026, 08:2314,449-20
18 Aug 2026, 07:4414,469-12
17 Aug 2026, 10:4914,481-32
15 Aug 2026, 18:1414,513-29
14 Aug 2026, 08:0814,542-31
12 Aug 2026, 23:1614,573-22
12 Aug 2026, 01:0214,595-22
11 Aug 2026, 03:3114,617-18
10 Aug 2026, 04:2414,635-18
9 Aug 2026, 05:0314,653-21
8 Aug 2026, 06:0314,674-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:1514,677no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:0814,677first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.86%
avg views ÷ 14,351 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held23 (5 May 202612 August 2026)
Views total9,910
Reactions total375
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,143 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍34630.3%
32128.1%
🔥30927.0%
🎉12310.8%
👏433.76%
👎10.087%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,360 views45 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥20👍178

10 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,540 views50 reactionsread 24 August 2026

🧠 Тема: Почему мы откладываем то, что действительно важно Иногда мы думаем, что откладываем дела из-за лени. Но часто причина совсем в другом. Мы откладываем то, что вызывает напряжение. Позвонить по важному вопросу. Начать новый проект. Поговорить о проблеме в отношениях. Признаться себе, что старая работа больше не приносит радости. Пока мы ничего не делаем, кажется, что проблема остаётся под контролем. Но вм

🔥2415👍11

8 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,440 views60 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥22👍2018

7 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈1,500 views42 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Бот для связи и консультаций: @Safe_YourMind_bot

👍2113🔥8

7 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,420 views59 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Чтобы поддержать наш проект, нажмите: https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=dvtn Это помогает нам делать больше мотивирующего контента❤️ За донат от 3000₽ вас проконсультирует дипломированный гештальт-терапевт!

27🔥19👍13

6 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,280 views86 reactionsread 24 August 2026

🌿 Тема: Не каждый человек останется в твоей жизни Мы часто тяжело переживаем, когда отношения заканчиваются. Кажется, что если человек ушёл, значит, мы сделали что-то не так. Но не все люди приходят в нашу жизнь навсегда. Одни учат нас доверять. Другие — отстаивать свои границы. Третьи показывают, каким человеком мы больше никогда не хотим быть рядом. Иногда мы цепляемся за отношения только потому, что боимся

31👍31🔥23👎1

31 Jul 2026, 05:25 UTC≈1,370 views33 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍16🔥107

24 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,510 views34 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Чтобы поддержать наш проект, нажмите: https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=dvtn Это помогает нам делать больше мотивирующего контента❤️ За донат от 3000₽ вас проконсультирует дипломированный гештальт-терапевт!

👍169🔥9

21 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC≈1,480 views30 reactionsread 24 August 2026

🌱 Тема: Почему мы так редко хвалим себя Большинство людей замечают свои ошибки быстрее, чем свои успехи. Не получилось — будем помнить неделями. Получилось — скажем себе: «Ну, ничего особенного.» Со временем это становится привычкой. Кажется, что радоваться своим достижениям — это хвастовство. А быть слишком довольным собой — неправильно. Но если постоянно замечать только недостатки, рано или поздно начинает

👍13🔥107

16 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,450 views32 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥149👍9

11 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC≈1,370 views18 reactionsread 24 August 2026

🧠 Тема: Почему мы так боимся чужого мнения Мы часто отказываемся от своих желаний не потому, что не можем. А потому, что боимся, что скажут другие. Боимся выглядеть смешно. Боимся ошибиться на глазах у окружающих. Боимся разочаровать тех, чьё мнение считаем важным. Из-за этого человек начинает жить не своей жизнью. Он выбирает работу, которая нравится другим. Молчит, когда хочется высказаться. Отказывается от ме

8👍6🔥4

1 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC≈1,020 views30 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍1210🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @psy_school_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психология №31” (@psy_school_tg), 14,351 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_school_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.