Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Psy_aide - записки сентиментального робота

Channel

Psy_aide - записки сентиментального робота

@psy_aide

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003081062158
TypeChannel
Username@psy_aide
DescriptionЦифровой психолог и Искусственный интеллект в психологии сам ai-бот тут: @WizardPsih2AIBot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 7 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/psy_aide

Growth

2810 Aug 2026, 16:01 — 28 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 06:45 — 28 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 16:0111 Aug 2026, 06:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–29 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:4528no change
10 Aug 2026, 16:0128first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Videos
1
Links
30

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 49s
Average length
2m 49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥939.1%
👍730.4%
521.7%
🥰28.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2025 to 22 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Nov 2025, 16:49 UTC21 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnalyticsDarkSideVideo

#День Российского? психолога. С празником мозгоправы и душезнавцы, психолухи Подпишись на Телеграм-канал #_AD Тёмная Сторона Аналитики #AnalyticsDarkside #AnalyticsDarkness

12 Oct 2025, 10:31 UTC30 viewsread 11 August 2026

#PsyAIde #blog 251010 Психологические факторы лишнего веса https://myaide.ru/blog/psy-aide-zametki-sentimentalnogo-robota-16/psikhologicheskie-faktory-lishnego-vesa-21 Как понимает психологию глобальный и автономный Искусственный Интеллект Подпишись на канал Psy_AIde #AI #ИИ #Psy

6 Oct 2025, 12:44 UTC45 viewsread 11 August 2026

#Psy #blog 251005 СИНДРОМ ВЕЧНО СИЛЬНОГО ЧЕЛОВЕКА https://myaide.ru/blog/psy-aide-zametki-sentimentalnogo-robota-16/sindrom-vechno-silnogo-cheloveka-20 Подпишись на канал Psy_AIde #AI #ИИ

28 Sept 2025, 08:48 UTC47 viewsread 11 August 2026

#PsyAIde #blog 250928 Признаки низкого эмоционального интеллекта https://myaide.ru/blog/psy-aide-zametki-sentimentalnogo-robota-16/priznaki-nizkogo-emotsionalnogo-intellekta-16 Подпишись на канал Psy_AIde #Psy #AI #ИИ

21 Sept 2025, 16:50 UTC46 viewsread 11 August 2026

#Psy #AI #HRM как роботы становятся расистами было понятно ещё в 2015м, когда появился ИИ-найм. О том, что "мужское" и "женское" - это про разное, тоже известно давно и роботы учатся у людей, учатся - тому чему учим. и с этим придётся считаться Исследования показывают, что инструменты искусственного интеллекта в здравоохранении проявляют предвзятость по отношению к женщинам и представителям меньшинств. https://www.p

18 Sept 2025, 16:07 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026

#AI #Psy #lie #ИИ учит человека врать? Или заставляет? Или помогает? Исследование показывает, что люди в 4 раза чаще склонны к мошенничеству, используя системы искусственного интеллекта. https://www.perplexity.ai/page/study-shows-people-4x-more-lik-_juUfNuFQ8aILkHsDKPS4w

13 Sept 2025, 11:55 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Think... Хорошо, пользователь спрашивает: "За что люди ненавидят программистов?" Нужно подумать о возможных причинах этой ненависти. Возможно, стоит начать с общих стереотипов и предубеждений. Например, многие считают программистов заносчивыми или слишком уверованными в свою правоту. Это может быть связано с тем, что технические специалисты часто говорят на своем языке, который непонятен другим. Также стоит упомянут

1

10 Sept 2025, 15:00 UTC40 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Уже ЗАВТРА ❤️ Ждём вас в ДК Железнодорожников 📍Челюскинцев 102 ⏰ В 18:00 вечера На встрече лучших людей этого города🧑‍🎓🧙👩‍🎤👩‍💻👩‍💼🥷🧞‍♂️ Чтобы собраться и обсудить самую горячую❤️‍🔥 тему сезона: "Искусственный интеллект в психологии"🚀 На фото, то где мы встретимся завтра 🤩

🔥4👍1🥰1

8 Sept 2025, 13:07 UTC167 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

11 сентября (четверг) в 18:00 Лекция: Искусственный интеллект в психологии ДК Железнодорожников Челюскинцев 102 Присоединяйтесь: https://t.me/psy_aide

2👍1🔥1🥰1

8 Sept 2025, 08:09 UTC137 viewsread 11 August 2026

#ИИ #AI #fail Искусственный интеллект врёт, потому что его учат врать Удивительные выводы исследования.. OpenAI утверждает, что галлюцинации искусственного интеллекта возникают из-за стимулов в обучении https://www.perplexity.ai/page/openai-claims-ai-hallucination-KGMIVibSRJ2FK3gSQUUEHA

8 Sept 2025, 06:36 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#Миргородская Юлия #Эксперт очной дискуссии Искусственный Интеллект в психологИИ 11 сентября 2025 Эксперт по психодиагностике бизнеса. Более 17 лет работала в крупных девелоперских компаниях — сначала в роли юриста, затем как операционный директор и директор по цифровизации. Сегодня Юлия занимается психодиагностикой бизнеса — комплексной работой с личностью собственника, корпоративной культурой, командами и ценност

👍32🔥1

7 Sept 2025, 17:34 UTCviews —

Psy_aide - записки сентиментального робота pinned «#Psy_AIde #AI #meet #EKB 250911 Искусственный Интеллект в психологИИ 11 сентября 2025 экспертная дискуссия, где мы продолжим обсуждать захватывающую тему искусственного интеллекта в разных сферах деятельности! Пройдёт очно без трансляции в ДК Железнодорожников…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @psy_aide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 957,045 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Psy_aide - записки сентиментального робота” (@psy_aide), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_aide.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.