Channel
@pstakefinance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,631subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001573414288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pstakefinance |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pstakefinance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 4,631 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 4,636 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 4,647 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 4,646 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 4,646 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
83 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 34 | 41.0% | |
| ❤ | 33 | 39.8% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 7.23% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.61% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.61% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.20% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 1 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Happy New Year from PSTAKE As we step into the new year, we’re energized by what lies ahead deeper research, smarter modular systems, and AI-native primitives built for real adoption. Thank you to our community, builders, and partners for shaping this journey with us. The next chapter of onchain intelligence is just getting started. Here’s to a year of innovation, coordination, and meaningful progress — PSTAKE
❤5
Signed Em
🎄 Season’s Greetings from the pSTAKE Team 🎄 As the year comes to a close, we want to extend our heartfelt thanks to our community, partners, and builders for your continued support and belief in pSTAKE. This year marked an important chapter in our journey, evolving beyond staking into AI-native research labs designed for real-world adoption. None of this progress would be possible without your trust, feedback, and…
❤8🥰1😱1🆒1
Signed Em
New paper: Classical-Fidelity–Aware AI Music Generation Classical music exposes audio artifacts hidden in other genres. We propose perceptually guided adaptive computation + classical-aware evaluation metrics to align AI generation with how expert listeners actually hear. Read more: 🔻🔻🔻 https://medium.com/@pstakeresearch/classical-fidelity-aware-ai-music-generation-adaptive-computation-and-perceptually-aligned-f90…
❤2👏1
Signed Em
‼️ Final Notice: Liquid Staking Deprecation This is the last announcement regarding pSTAKE’s legacy liquid staking products. Support for all deprecated liquid staking interfaces will end after 31 December 2025. After the new year, we will no longer be able to maintain or support these products or the related infrastructure. Please note that pSTAKE is now operated by a new team. The original team that built and mai…
❤4
Signed Bartv | pSTAKE
pSTAKE began by advancing BTCFi. But the data revealed something bigger. From financial primitives → intelligent systems. From staking mechanics → AI research. Today, pSTAKE has evolved into an AI Research & Development Lab, researching on models that see, listen, and understand.
🔥6
Signed Em
🚀 We’re LIVE! Join us right now for our deep-dive AMA with Gatsby & the pSTAKE team. We’re unpacking our new direction, research focus, and what this evolution means for the community happening live as we speak. 🔻🔻🔻 Join the Space → https://x.com/i/spaces/1lDxLBMZyNaGm
❤1
Signed Em
New Research Drop: Tree-Structured Reasoning for Financial Policy Interpretation This work introduces a method that optimizes reasoning paths, not just outputs combining Tree-of-Thought exploration, structured scoring, and preference-shaped learning to improve policy compliance & safety in financial systems. 📄 Smarter, safer reasoning → better decisions. 🔻🔻🔻 Read More: https://medium.com/@pstakeresearch/tree-struct…
🔥3
Signed Em
PSTAKE is in a new era. 🚀 New leadership. New identity. New mission. We’re evolving from a staking protocol into a research-led AI + Web3 lab exploring modular assets, real-world economic systems & next-gen decentralised innovation. Weekly research. Open communication. Community-first. 👉 Read more: https://medium.com/@pstakeresearch/pstake-enters-a-new-era-leadership-transition-brand-upgrade-the-road-ahead-d2e1c…
🔥6
Signed Em
AI that listens. AI that learns. AI inspired by sound.
👏2
Signed Em
🔥 LIVE NOW! The pSTAKE AMA has officially started! Come hear the team discuss our new institutional liquidity, AI research direction, and what’s next for the ecosystem. Jump in: https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1BdGYZRYjAlJX
🔥4
Signed Em
AMA on X 🔥 The pSTAKE team will unpack our new institutional liquidity inflow and the roadmap as we evolve into an AI Research Lab. If you want the full picture, don’t miss this. 🗓️ 4th December, 2025. ⏰ 1PM UTC 🔻🔻🔻 Set your reminder: https://x.com/i/spaces/1BdGYZRYjAlJX
🔥5❤4😁3
Signed Em
We’ve been quietly building. Talking with the right partners. Sharpening our direction. Today, we share with the community, PSTAKE has gotten interest of an institutional liquidity to power our evolution into an AI Research Lab focused on real-sector innovation. Real vision attracts real conviction. ✨ 🔻🔻🔻 Read more: https://medium.com/@pstakeresearch/pstake-to-secure-new-institutional-liquidity-injection-as-it-evo…
❤3
Signed Em
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pstakefinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 553,874 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pstakefinance named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“pSTAKE Announcements” (@pstakefinance), 4,631 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pstakefinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.