Mavzuimizga mos rolik ekan. Menimcha, barcha tildagilar uchun xam tushunarli qilib ishlangan. https://t.me/psixolog_azlarova
🔥4👍2❤1💯1

Channel
@psixolog_azlarova
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,642subscribers
-368 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002187712771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psixolog_azlarova |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psixolog_azlarova |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 2,642 | -14 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 2,656 | -26 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 2,682 | -53 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 2,735 | -23 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 2,758 | -31 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 2,789 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 2,795 | -31 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 2,826 | -41 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 2,867 | -32 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 2,899 | -43 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 2,942 | -30 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 2,972 | -28 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 3,000 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 3,010 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
416 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 234 | 56.3% | |
| 👍 | 86 | 20.7% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 7.45% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 6.01% | |
| 🤩 | 15 | 3.61% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 2.40% | |
| 😘 | 5 | 1.20% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.962% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.962% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.481% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 416 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Mavzuimizga mos rolik ekan. Menimcha, barcha tildagilar uchun xam tushunarli qilib ishlangan. https://t.me/psixolog_azlarova
🔥4👍2❤1💯1
Bugun o’zim ekkan gullarimning birinchi xosilini oldim. Xudoga shukur🫠
🥰11❤6👍2
Assalomu aleykum. Gullarni yaxshi ko’radigan, yomon ko’radigan, umuman, gul xaqida o’ylamaydigan xamma-xammaga xayrli kun. Juma muborak bo’lsin!
🥰11❤5🤩2👍1
Shu videoning davomini yozaman, deb xecham qulay vaqt topolmadim. Esimdan chiqib qolmasidan, matnli post qilib yozib qo’ydim. Nega Xitoy «ideal hayot»ni namoyish etadigan blogerlarga qarshi kurashmoqda? Xitoy hashamatli turmush tarzini muntazam namoyish etadigan blogerlar faoliyatini cheklashni boshladi. Qimmatbaho avtomobillar, mashhur brendlar, lyuks turmush tarzi va ko‘z-ko‘z qilingan iste’molni targ‘ib qiluvchi …
❤8👏3
Shuning uchun inson ko‘pincha o‘zi ham anglamagan holda quyidagi savollarga javob izlaydi: «Men yetarlicha muvaffaqiyatlimanmi?» «Men boshqalardan yomonroq yashayapmanmi?» «Nega menda bu narsalar yo‘q?» Muammo shundaki, ijtimoiy tarmoqlar hayotning sun’iy me’yorini shakllantiradi. Agar inson har kuni qimmatbaho sovg‘alar, hashamatli uylar, elita avtomobillari va uzluksiz sayohatlar haqidagi o‘nlab videolarni tomosha…
👏6👍4
G’alati bir paradoks bor: biz nimanidir juda qattiq xohlaganimiz sari, go’yo unga erisha olmaymiz. Ammo aynan uni qo’yib yuborganimizda, orzu qilgan narsamiz kutilmaganda hayotimizda paydo bo’ladi. Bu sehr yoki ezoterikaga o’xshab tuyulishi mumkin. Aslida esa, psixologiyada bu hodisaning chuqur ilmiy izohi mavjud. Karl Yung shunday degan edi: “Qarshilik ko’rsatgan narsang saqlanib qoladi. Qabul qilgan narsang esa yo…
❤20👍5🔥2💯1
Biror narsaga qanchalik ko’p qarshilik qilinsa, shu narsani shuncha ko’p xayotimizga kirgizayotgan bo’lamiz. Chunki qarshilik xam, nafrat va qochish xam munosabat. Munosabat qancha ko’p bo’lsa, biz o’sha narsaga shunchalik yaqinmiz. Davomi👇
❤10🎉2🔥2
Yangi uyga ko’chkanimizdan keyin yangi qo’shnilar bilan endi endi yaqin bo’la boshladik. Katta xovlida o’sib, katta xovliga kelin bo’lganim uchun ko’p qavatli kvartirada yashashga moslashishim uchun ancha vaqt ketti. Kecha tog’dan kelib, to’yda kettim. Qo’shnimiz o’g’il uylantirdilar. Judayam bir birlariga mos juft ekan. Bahtli bo’lishsin. https://t.me/psixolog_azlarova
❤18🎉2🔥2
Yozning oxirgi kunlari qolganida, ta’til tugashini istamagan boladek his qilyapman o’zimni. O’ylab qarasam, xar yili avgust oyida shunga o’xshash xis bo’lar ekan. Yana kimda shunday? https://t.me/psixolog_azlarova
❤21🔥3👍2🤩1
Bugun mening kayfiyatimni ko’targan rolik. Yaxshilar ko’pligi yaxshi-da.
❤42👍11🤩1
Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarning ta’siri xaqida qiziqarli ma’lumotni sizga ulashmoqchiman. Undan avval esa, videoda aytilgan xabarga sizning fikringizni bilgim keldi. Nima deb o’ylaysiz, Xitoy xukumatining qarori to’g’rimi? https://t.me/psixolog_azlarova
❤13🔥1
Hazil hazil bilan. Ammo ohirgi vaqtda rivojlanish, o’z ustida ishlash va mukammallikka intilish yangicha qiyofaga— trendda bo’lish talabiga o’tib boryapti. Insonlar bahtli va xotirjam bo’lish uchun emas, ijtimoiy tarmoqlar trendga chiqargan “mukammal obraz”ga mos bo’lish uchun o’zlaridan ko’p narsalarni talab qilyaptilar. Masalan: ideal qomat, katta daromad, doim sport formasida bo’lish, to’xtovsiz sayohat, aynana …
👍12❤5🔥3🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @psixolog_azlarova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sayyora Azlarova” (@psixolog_azlarova), 2,642 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psixolog_azlarova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.