Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ujian Psikometrik 2026 by Cikgu Khairul

Channel

Ujian Psikometrik 2026 by Cikgu Khairul

@psikometriki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

20,721subscribers

-333 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001619120776
TypeChannel
Username@psikometriki
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psikometriki

Growth

20,72121,05420,887.57 August 2026 — 21,054 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,054 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,053 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,047 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,037 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,024 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,019 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,995 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,979 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,965 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,948 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,938 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,929 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,917 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,905 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,885 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,867 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,862 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,855 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,845 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,834 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,823 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,816 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,799 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,777 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,761 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,743 subscribers6 September 2026 — 20,721 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 30 days, net -333. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,671–21,104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 22:3720,721-22
4 Sept 2026, 09:4020,743-18
2 Sept 2026, 21:2620,761-16
1 Sept 2026, 19:0820,777-22
31 Aug 2026, 19:0520,799-17
30 Aug 2026, 21:2520,816-7
29 Aug 2026, 23:0520,823-11
28 Aug 2026, 23:5720,834-11
28 Aug 2026, 03:0720,845-10
27 Aug 2026, 05:5720,855-7
26 Aug 2026, 02:5520,862-5
25 Aug 2026, 03:4520,867-18
23 Aug 2026, 20:5420,885-20
22 Aug 2026, 02:0420,905-12
20 Aug 2026, 19:3420,917-12
19 Aug 2026, 18:3520,929-9
18 Aug 2026, 19:3720,938-10
17 Aug 2026, 21:3820,948-17
16 Aug 2026, 21:5720,965-14
15 Aug 2026, 17:1520,979first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 26 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.51%
avg views ÷ 20,721 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.047%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held31 (26 November 20252 September 2026)
Views total2,696
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍956.3%
🥰425.0%
🎉318.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC586 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Jawapan Realistik Ada Sifat Manusiawi. Manusia bukan sentiasa tenang. Manusia pernah marah, tersinggung dan melakukan kesilapan. Sebab itu dalam ujian psikometrik, jawapan yang terlalu sempurna boleh kelihatan kurang realistik dan sukar dipercayai. Contohnya: ❌ “Saya tidak pernah berasa marah.” ✅ “Ada masanya saya berasa marah.” Jawapan realistik bukan bermaksud sengaja memilih jawapan buruk. Ia bermaksud menja

13 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC≈2,110 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

1. Saya berasa sangat bimbang tentang wang. 2. Saya berpuas hati dengan jumlah wang/gaji yang diperoleh. Secara asasnya, dua ayat ini membawa arah yang agak berbeza. Soalan 1 menunjukkan seseorang itu ada kebimbangan kewangan. Soalan 2 pula menunjukkan seseorang itu ada kepuasan terhadap pendapatan. Kalau seseorang jawab setuju untuk kedua-dua soalan ini, ia nampak seperti ada sedikit kecelaruan identiti: “Saya

🎉1

3 Jun 2026, 04:07 UTC≈3,680 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Kalau anda nak tahu, tahun lepas SPA guna 67 kombinasi soalan dalam mengesan jawapan tak konsisten. Selain Lie Scale, skor konsisten juga penting dalam menentukan kebolehpercayaan jawapan yg telah calon pilih. Kombinasi soalan itu saya sertakan dekat artikel di bawah ini: https://pegawaitadbir.com/jawapan-tidak-konsisten/ Semoga bermanfaat. Cikgu Khairul Psss.. Jika ada pertanyaan pasal ujian psikometrik, sila w

👍1

3 Jun 2026, 00:31 UTC≈3,160 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ini merupakan indeks Lie Scale yang selamat dalam ujian penilaian psikologi PTD. Berada di indeks 20 (iaitu bawah 40). Ia memberi gambaran jawapan yang lebih spontan dan natural. Pihak penilai akan lebih yakin dengan profil personaliti anda tanpa ada skeptikal. Apa kepentingan Lie Scale ini? Inilah indikator yang digunakan oleh pihak penilai dalam menapis jawapan yg bersifat realistik. Walaupun skor kompetensi a

🥰1

1 Jun 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,520 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Dalam simulasi PTD, Lie Scale dipecahkan kepada empat kategori. 1. Natural 2. Terkawal 3. Cenderung terlalu sempurna 4. Perlu berhati-hati. Empat kategori ini digunakan oleh pihak penilai dalam mengesan adakah seseorang calon itu cuba menampilkan diri mereka secara sempurna. Dalam gambar ini, individu ini mendapat Lie Score = 93. Jadi, apa maksudnya? Daripada perspektif penilai, mereka akan anggap individu ini c

1 Jun 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Bagaimana format ujian penilaian psikologi PTD? Soalan 1-406 menggunakan skala jawapan: Ya dan Tidak. Soalan 407-564 menggunakan skala jawapan: Sangat tidak setuju Tidak setuju Setuju Sangat setuju. 1. Tak ada soalan math, english dan pengetahuan am. Hanya soalan personaliti sahaja akan ditanya. 2. Pastikan format soalan kena tepat dahulu, supaya anda lebih terbiasa menjawab di hari ujian nanti. 3. Pastikan Li

1 Jun 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

556. Saya berasa sangat bimbang tentang wang. 560. Saya berpuas hati dengan jumlah wang/gaji yang diperoleh. Secara asasnya, dua ayat ini membawa arah yang agak berbeza. Soalan 556 menunjukkan seseorang itu ada kebimbangan kewangan. Soalan 560 pula menunjukkan seseorang itu ada kepuasan terhadap pendapatan. Kalau seseorang jawab setuju untuk kedua-dua soalan ini, ia nampak seperti ada sedikit kecelaruan identiti:

30 May 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Skor Konsisten dalam Ujian Psikometrik PTD Dalam ujian psikometrik PTD, Skor Konsisten digunakan untuk menilai sama ada jawapan calon stabil, selari dan tidak bercanggah sepanjang ujian. Skor ini bukan menilai sama ada calon 'baik' atau 'tidak baik'. Sebaliknya, ia menilai kualiti jawapan calon. Maksudnya, sistem akan melihat sama ada calon menjawab dengan teliti, faham soalan, dan tidak memberi jawapan yang berub

30 May 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,910 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Lie Scale dalam Ujian Psikometrik PTD Dalam ujian psikometrik PTD, Lie Scale digunakan untuk mengesan sama ada calon menjawab terlalu ideal, terlalu sempurna, atau terlalu menjaga imej diri. Dalam ujian tahun lepas, pihak SPA menggunakan sekitar 15 soalan sebagai indikator Lie Scale. Contoh pola jawapan yang boleh dikesan: “Sekali-sekala saya memikirkan perkara yang tidak baik untuk diperkatakan.” “Saya tidak sel

👍1

18 May 2026, 14:28 UTC≈3,050 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Sebenarnya, tapisan jawapan konsisten anda boleh lepasi dengan mudah jika anda tahu apakah kombinasi soalan dalam ujian PTD. Berita baik, Cikgu Khairul sudah senaraikan 67 kombinasi jawapan tak konsisten untuk anda. Ada 134 soalan dalam 67 kombinasi ini. Anda wajib kena elakkan daripada memilih kombinasi jawapan ini untuk pastikan skor konsisten anda ditahap yang tertinggi. Ini sebenarnya bonus, nanti boleh downlo

18 May 2026, 11:52 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 12 August 2026

Bagaimana SPA uji tahap konsisten dalam psikometrik PTD? Dalam 564 soalan, terdapat 67 soalan yang dipasangkan untuk menguji tahap konsisten individu. Bermaksud, 67 x 2 = 134 soalan akan ditanya dalam struktur soalan sedikit berbeza, tapi membawa maksud yang sama. Contoh soalan: Soalan 1: Saya bangun dalam keadaan segar dan cukup rehat pada kebanyakan pagi. Soalan 2: Tidur saya tidak lena dan terganggu. Kedua-du

18 May 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,340 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ada ke yang dapat panggilan ujian PTD gred M9? Apa format ujian ini? Untuk ujian kali ini, soalan dipecahkan kepada dua struktur. Soalan 1-406, menggunakan pilihan jawapan YA dan TIDAK. Untuk soalan 407-564, menggunakan pilihan 5 pilihan jawapan (Sangat Setuju, Setuju, Kurang Setuju, Tidak Setuju dan Sangat Tidak Setuju). Masa yang diberikan ialah 3 jam 30 minit. Boleh logout sekiranya anda penat menjawab, dan b

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @psikometriki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ujian Psikometrik 2026 by Cikgu Khairul” (@psikometriki), 20,721 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psikometriki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.