Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,928–1,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 05:17
1,935
-2
1 Nov 2026, 18:07
1,937
-1
29 Oct 2026, 19:48
1,938
-1
26 Oct 2026, 16:56
1,939
-1
23 Oct 2026, 18:08
1,940
-2
20 Oct 2026, 22:09
1,942
-3
18 Oct 2026, 06:18
1,945
-1
15 Oct 2026, 11:39
1,946
-3
12 Oct 2026, 19:57
1,949
-1
5 Oct 2026, 23:21
1,950
-9
28 Sept 2026, 11:02
1,959
-3
15 Sept 2026, 16:58
1,962
-3
11 Sept 2026, 17:17
1,965
-4
7 Sept 2026, 00:17
1,969
-1
2 Sept 2026, 06:52
1,970
+1
30 Aug 2026, 03:05
1,969
-2
27 Aug 2026, 04:08
1,971
-1
24 Aug 2026, 01:54
1,972
-2
20 Aug 2026, 19:24
1,974
-1
17 Aug 2026, 16:57
1,975
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 14 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
498 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
190
38.2%
❤
107
21.5%
🔥
99
19.9%
🤣
38
7.63%
🙏
29
5.82%
💯
17
3.41%
❤🔥
15
3.01%
🥰
2
0.402%
🤔
1
0.201%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 498 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 25 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
10 самых вредных продуктов для вашего здоровья - и что делает их такими вредными:
1. Энергетики
Напичканы сахаром, искусственным кофеином и химикатами, которые повышают (а затем понижают) вашу энергию.
2. Масла семян
Воспалительные масла, такие как канола и соя, которые нарушают работу ваших гормонов и кишечника.
3. Газировка
Чистая сахарная бомба с нулевой питательной ценностью и связью с резистентностью к инсули…
Почему важно не бояться честного разговора в отношениях?
Потому что молчание не сохраняет связь, а разрушает её тихо и изнутри. Ты злишься, но молчишь. Обижаешься, но улыбаешься. Не согласен, но соглашаешься. Кажется, что так спокойнее. Меньше конфликтов, меньше риска. Но это не так!
• Боясь конфликта, ты теряешь не ссору, а живой контакт. Вместо тебя рядом остаётся удобная копия.
• Молчание не лечит. Оно превраща…
Как легко находить общий язык с людьми?
1. Проявляйте интерес. Не изображайте вежливость — правда слушайте. Спрашивайте: «А как ты к этому пришёл?» или «Что в этом тебя цепляет?» Людям важно быть услышанными.
2. Ищите точки соприкосновения. Общие темы — мостик к диалогу. Кино, музыка, хобби, путешествия — начинайте с простого.
3. Включайте тело. Улыбка, зрительный контакт, лёгкий наклон вперёд — всё это говорит «я…
Успокой свой разум этими мыслями:
1. Не получилось? Значит сейчас не время и не моё это. А если не моё, значит впереди что-то лучше. Так часто и бывает.
2. Если что-то не сложилось, возможно, это уберегло тебя от больших проблем. Иногда отказ — это защита свыше.
3. Разочарование — это тоже результат. Значит, стало ясно, куда больше не стоит возвращаться.
4. Потеря — это не всегда минус. Иногда она просто освобожд…
▪️ Создавайте воспоминания
Когда вы думаете о запоминающихся моментах жизни, вы не вспоминаете часы, проведённые на работе.
Живите так, чтобы было что вспомнить. Не откладывайте на потом то, что может сделать вас счастливыми сегодня.
Путешествуйте и создавайте больше воспоминаний!
👩💻 Психология путешествий
Притча о стакане воды
Учитель взял стакан с водой и спросил учеников:
— Сколько, по-вашему, весит этот стакан?
— Примерно 200 граммов, — ответили ученики.
— Как видите, весит он совсем немного, — сказал учитель и спросил: — А что будет, если я подержу этот стакан в течение нескольких минут?
— Почти ничего не будет.
— Так. А если я подержу его так в течение часа?
— Ваша рука устанет.
— А если я подержу его несколько …
☕️ Притча о кофе
Приходит к отцу молодая девушка и говорит:
— Отец, я устала, у меня такая тяжелая жизнь, такие трудности и проблемы, я все время плыву против течения, у меня нет больше сил… Что мне делать?
Отец вместо ответа поставил на огонь три одинаковых кастрюли с водой. В одну бросил морковь, в другую положил яйцо, в третью насыпал размолотые зерна кофе. Через некоторое время он вынул из воды морковь и яйцо и…
⭐️ Путешествуйте, пока молодые!
С чемоданами или рюкзаками, поездами, самолетами или автостопом!
Пусть никакие препятствия вам не помешают получать новые впечатления и увидеть больше мира!
Не ждите нового года, летнего отпуска, окончания университета! Планируйте путешествие уже!
Живите мыслями о путешествии - и оно воплотится в жизнь!
Только не сидите дома, ведь вокруг есть столько интересного! 🤎
👩💻 Психология п…
🔥41👍13❤10🙏2❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @psihologimein. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 25 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@psihologimein named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@psihologihome named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психология путешествий аккаунт” (@psihologimein), 1,935 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psihologimein.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.