Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психолог с твоего района

Channel

Психолог с твоего района

@psiholog_seleznev

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,750subscribers

-207 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001286685276
TypeChannel
Username@psiholog_seleznev
DescriptionПишу о том, почему мы ссоримся, бросаем начатое, не можем найти мотивацию (закатилась под диван) Здесь нет удачников и неудачников. Здесь все свои :) Запись на консультацию или по рекламе: @seleznev_nnov Канал в перечне РКН.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/psiholog_seleznev

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,7508,9578,853.57 August 2026 — 8,957 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,956 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,945 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,937 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,922 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,919 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,906 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,897 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,892 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,882 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,860 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,874 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,870 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,841 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,819 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,800 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,787 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,779 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,777 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,765 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,758 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,759 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,757 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,750 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 89 days, net -207. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,719–8,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 09:488,750-7
1 Nov 2026, 19:018,757-2
29 Oct 2026, 21:458,759+1
27 Oct 2026, 00:008,758-7
24 Oct 2026, 05:378,765-12
21 Oct 2026, 02:308,777-2
18 Oct 2026, 03:068,779-8
14 Oct 2026, 21:398,787-13
11 Oct 2026, 23:598,800-19
5 Oct 2026, 04:598,819-22
26 Sept 2026, 19:398,841-29
15 Sept 2026, 08:588,870-4
12 Sept 2026, 01:568,874+14
8 Sept 2026, 02:018,860-22
2 Sept 2026, 12:538,882-10
30 Aug 2026, 14:358,892-5
27 Aug 2026, 14:258,897-9
24 Aug 2026, 06:168,906-13
20 Aug 2026, 06:048,919-3
17 Aug 2026, 16:178,922first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.87%
avg views ÷ 8,750 subscribers
Avg views / post
688
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held35 (27 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total6,194
Reactions total632
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 21:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,610
Videos
≈375
Links
≈312

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 10s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,486 reactions across 35 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤58723.6%
😁47118.9%
🔥37415.0%
💯29211.7%
👍2329.33%
🤣2128.53%
😱873.50%
🥰321.29%
🤪261.05%
🙈230.925%
🤯230.925%
🤔190.764%
🐳180.724%
👏160.644%
🤝160.644%
🤗100.402%
👀90.362%
💊90.362%
😢50.201%
🤩50.201%
11 further kinds200.805%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,486 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTC231 views43 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Заявка на самую тупую кругосветку в истории? Знакомьтесь, товарищи. Нашего сегодняшнего героя зовут Карл Бушби. В 1998 году он ушёл из дома и вернулся только вчера. Пропадал 28 лет. За это время сам Карл превратился из молодого парня в обветренного и седобородого мужчину, за это время его сын успел стать отцом, состарилась мать. Где же пропадал Бушби? Может быть он попал в плен к сомалийским пиратам? Может трудился…

🤪15😱11👀7👏3😁3🤔2🔥1🙉1

Signed Евгений Селезнев

3 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC420 views47 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Товарищи, я тут внезапно открыл для себя новый вид консультаций. Не психотерапевтические, а продвиженческие. На прошлой неделе уже провёл 3 штуки. Да, они о том, как продвигать себя в интернете, где лучше заводить каналы, где это делать нет смысла, сколько тратить на рекламу, где её брать, где не брать, как писать креативы и всё, всё, всё. Не могу сказать, что я лучший в этом деле. Скорее даже наоборот. Я слил неск…

❤20🔥19👍6✍1🐳1

Signed Евгений Селезнев

2 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC507 views100 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Пусть ещё только понедельник. Но давайте уже немного расслабимся, отпустим, примем что-то покрепче😁👌 И посмотрим наши понедельничные послеобеденные мемы😎

🤣48😁25🔥17👍9⚡1

Signed Евгений Селезнев

31 Oct 2026, 13:31 UTC760 views82 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Люби и не гноби Вот что мы делаем, когда не получается бросить вредную привычку? Один раз, два раза, двадцать два раза? Когда не получается стать лучшей версией себя? Когда повторяем вроде бы как очевидные ошибки? Правильно, мы начинаем поносить себя на всю ивановскую и костромскую. Даже до владимирской долетает. И вроде бы гнев праведный, но мы попадаем в тот самый замкнутый круг. Потому что бомбардировка самого …

❤53👍13🔥10💯5👏1

Signed Евгений Селезнев

28 Oct 2026, 16:55 UTC910 views92 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

О да, о да😂

😁42💯37🔥7🤣6

Signed Евгений Селезнев

27 Oct 2026, 15:35 UTC989 views109 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Кто впадает в экстаз от порядка? Зацените февраль 2027-го. Начинается в понедельник, заканчивается в воскресенье. Четыре ровных недели. Порадуйте своё обсессивно-компульсивное расстройство, у кого есть😄

🔥57😁24🤗10❤8👍4👌3🤣3

Signed Евгений Селезнев

27 Oct 2026, 12:32 UTC886 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

#районный_рекомендует Можно, конечно, а зачем? Годам к сорока у вас точно есть не одна клетчатая китайская сумка с достижениями, провалами, мечтами, целями, разочарованиями, откровениями и вот этим всем. Но что делать, если есть опыт, есть время, а ответа на вопрос «чего я хочу теперь» нет? Пробуешь это, пробуешь то, но как-то ничего не зажигает. Как-то всё...ни о чём. А вот как раз о том, чтобы ни о чём стало те…

👍10

Signed Евгений Селезнев

27 Oct 2026, 10:50 UTC727 views56 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Задача терапии не в том, чтобы забыть прошлое, а чтобы оно перестало предопределять настоящее. Мариан Фусу «Тяжёлое детство — не приговор?» Хорошо сказано. Правда, бывает и наоборот. Не только тяжелое детство может фонить в настоящем, но и очень прекрасное тоже. При том раскладе, когда взрослая жизнь идёт куда-то не туда или как-то не так. И ты регулярно уносишься в воспоминания о детстве, как о времени, когда бы…

👍29❤14🔥11👏2

Signed Евгений Селезнев

26 Oct 2026, 10:56 UTC764 views93 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Если у вас был обед, то он наверняка давно закончился. Но вот посмотреть мемы и порелаксировать всё равно можно. И точно нужно🤘😏

😁57🔥15👍12❤7❤‍🔥1🐳1

Signed Евгений Селезнев

28 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC195 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Товарищи, решил объявить мини-распродажу всех моих трёх мини-курсов. До понедельника отдаю по мини-ценнику. Боже, у меня какая-то болезненная страсть к слову мини😄 Знаю, какими скучными могут быть курсы. Даже очень полезные. Поэтому свои делаю повеселее. С шутками и прибаутками (правда, специфическими). Итак, что там у меня есть: Курс №1: «Я тебя сделаю 2» (от прокрастинации) Программа: Серия №1: Каким ты был, т…

❤15🔥4

Signed Евгений Селезнев

28 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC320 views104 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Психолог с твоего района 2.0 Наверное, дорогие мои товарищи, кто-то из вас заметил, что я почти перестал писать сюда посты. В отдельные недели ситуация вообще комическая — за мемами в понедельник идут мемы в другой понедельник. Что случилось? Во-первых, я немного исписался. В лучшие годы выпускал по одному авторскому посту в день! То есть, не просто закидывал стыренную хохму, а превращал мысль в полотно текста. По…

❤67🥰16🤝14🔥5🐳2

Signed Евгений Селезнев

25 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC519 views99 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Воу, оказывается я взял и как-то случайно вчера снёс мемы😳 Вернул взад, пусть будут👌😁

😁58👍13❤8🤣8🔥3🍾2🐳2👀2

Signed Евгений Селезнев

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @psiholog_seleznev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ирина Ковалёва, тренер-мотиватор
@trenermotivator · 31,631
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА АЛЕКСЕЕВА - путь к процветанию
@psyaal · 38,388
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психолог с твоего района” (@psiholog_seleznev), 8,750 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psiholog_seleznev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.