Авторский канал о реальной практике инвестиций на финансовых рынках.
Занимаюсь инвестициями более 10 лет с целью достижения финансовой независимости и стабильного пассивного дохода. Делюсь своими мыслями, опытом, успехами и ошибками.
Админ @heimdall81
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
6 measurements spanning 13 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,344–9,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 10:03
9,378
+19
16 Aug 2026, 18:52
9,359
+11
13 Aug 2026, 05:47
9,348
-7
10 Aug 2026, 05:26
9,355
-17
7 Aug 2026, 10:30
9,372
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:30
9,372
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 9,378 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,720
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held
34 (22 July 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Views total
87,130
Reactions total
1,429
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,710
Videos
≈8
Links
≈1,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,429 reactions across 31 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,010
70.7%
❤
100
7.00%
🔥
97
6.79%
😁
94
6.58%
🤔
53
3.71%
😱
36
2.52%
💯
23
1.61%
👎
6
0.42%
😢
5
0.35%
👏
4
0.28%
🤩
1
0.07%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,429reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 32 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prudent_invest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#облигации #инвестКЦ #валюта
Облигации Инвест КЦ.
Разбор финансовой ситуации эмитента.
Я вчера сообщил, что продал выпуск валютных облигаций ИнвКЦ1Р1 (выпуск 001P-01, ISIN: RU000A10BQV8), так как их надёжность стала вызывать у меня очень большие сомнения.
Дело в том, что я прочитал отчётность эмитента ООО "Инвест КЦ" и пришел к выводу, что лучше продать даже по 90%, чем рисковать потерей всей суммы вложения.
Эмит…
Столкнулся с довольно банальной проблемой.
Не со всех зарубежных площадок сейчас можно просто взять и вывести деньги на российскую карту. Да и в целом с оплатой иностранных сервисов и покупками за границей наши карты, мягко говоря, перестали работать.
Поэтому лучшим решением всех проблем было оформить зарубежную именную карту. Давно собирался, но всё откладывал.
В итоге оформил у Гузель 👉🏻 @GUZELCARDS
Теперь есть…
#облигации #валюта
Облигации ИнвестКЦ.
Еще один проблемный эмитент в моем портфеле.
Сегодня я их продал!
Слишком долго не мог принять это решение. Но все-таки, наблюдая, как котировки уходят все ниже, и почитав отчётность за первое полугодие 2026, принял решение продать по цене 90% от номинала. Примерно -8% от средней цены набора позиции.
У меня в портфеле их было 20 штук по 100$ каждая, итого примерно на 160 000р…
#облигации #балтийскийлизинг
📈 Облигации «Балтийского лизинга» демонстрируют положительную динамику на фоне выплаты купонов.
Портал Cbonds сообщает, что компания Балтийский лизинг выплатила купоны по двум из своих выпусков облигаций.
17 августа «Балтийский лизинг» исполнил обязательства по выплате 13-го купона по облигациям серии БО-П18 в размере 78.45 млн рублей. 18 августа компания выплатила 21-й купон по облига…
#облигации #рубль #балтийскийлизинг
Почему упали бумаги Балтийский лизинг? И что теперь делать?
Такое падение бумаг Балтийского лизинга является неожиданным, так как несмотря на ухудшение финансовой ситуации у компании, все равно она остаётся одной из крупнейших лизинговых компаний, не является убыточной в отличие от некоторых других типа ВУШ или ВК, а кредитный рейтинг на данный момент АА-, что в теории означает в…
#облигации #рубль #балтийскийлизинг
Почему упали бумаги Балтийский лизинг? И что теперь делать?
На прошлой неделе держатели облигаций компании Балтийский лизинг с ужасом увидели, как эти бумаги упали за день на 5%, затем они падали на 10%, а вчера снижение достигало 15%. И все это случилось буквально за несколько дней. Доходность выросла с 20% до 35 и в моменте доходила даже до 40%.
При этом Балтлиз является одной…
Результаты моего портфеля резко улучшились в августе.
Рубль ещё и не начал сильно падать, он всего на 5% ниже, чем в начале года, а портфель уже вышел в очень ощутимый плюс.
На скриншотах счёт в Т-инвестициях, единственный счёт, который я показываю с цифрами, так как он небольшой по сравнению с другими. При этом он самый волатильный, так как в нем большая ставка на золото, чуть ли не половина счета в фонде на золот…
Курс доллара на межбанке достиг 84 руб. Все, как я и предполагал.
Рост за последние 30 дней почти 10%. Золото в рублях вообще выросло примерно на 20%, а золотые облигации Селигдар, про которые я недавно делал обзор, выросли еще больше, на 23-24% за 30 дней.
Мои ожидания по курсу рубля на август полностью совпали с реальностью.
А сегодня к перечисленным ранее факторам, играющим против рубля, добавился и еще один. На…
#минфин #бюджет #дефицит
Российская казна пуста!
Минфин опубликовал данные о рекордном дефиците бюджета за 7 месяцев 2026 года.
По данным Министерства финансов РФ за 7 месяцев (январь — июль) 2026 года:
Доходы: собрано 22,112 трлн рублей (+8,8% к аналогичному периоду прошлого года). Из них ненефтегазовые доходы составили 17,518 трлн рублей, а нефтегазовые — 4,595 трлн рублей.
Расходы составили 28,567 трлн рублей…
Похоже, что в акциях и индексе Мосбиржи отскок закончен или почти закончен.
Пора снова вниз.
Кстати, хочу еще раз обратить внимание, насколько все в акциях сейчас не предсказуемо.
Обвал ниже 2000 пунктов, то есть ниже уровня даже начала СВО был без веских причин, на каких-то страхах или слухах. С тех пор ничего не изменилось, а рост случился на 25%. При этом на сегодня экономические данные и статистика на мой взгляд…
‼️Навигатор по каналу 📌
Приветствую вас, уважаемые подписчики!
Обязательно прочитайте этот пост, чтобы лучше ориентироваться на канале. За много лет тут накопилось уже много полезной информации по разным темам и аспектам инвестировать. Предлагаю использовать этот навигатор, чтобы лучше найти самое интересное и полезное
На этом канале я публикую свой авторский взгляд на финансовые рынки, как российский, так и заруб…
👍21❤6🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @prudent_invest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Дождались. Уже егодня в 13 30 будет решение ЦБ РФ по ставке.
Многие ожидают, что КС поднимут, я считаю, что либо снизят, либо оставят, как есть. Давайте проголосуем и попробуем спрогнозировать какой будет новая ставка?
13,5% (снижение на 0,75)0%
13,75% (снижение на 0,50)3%
14% (снижение на 0,25)49%
14,25%. Оставят как есть.48%
14,50%. Повысят на 0,25 и начнут новый цикл повышения.4%
14,75%. Повысят сразу на 0,501%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 612,834 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Осторожный инвестор” (@prudent_invest), 9,378 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prudent_invest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.