11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +8,613. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,791–26,020 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 16:13
24,724
+393
17 Aug 2026, 15:14
24,331
+5,308
16 Aug 2026, 05:46
19,023
+897
14 Aug 2026, 16:46
18,126
+666
13 Aug 2026, 06:54
17,460
+433
12 Aug 2026, 08:11
17,027
+516
11 Aug 2026, 06:53
16,511
+388
10 Aug 2026, 05:42
16,123
+36
9 Aug 2026, 05:57
16,087
-24
8 Aug 2026, 08:31
16,111
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:15
16,111
first reading
Engagement
374 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 24,724 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,120
374 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
374
of 374 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 365 of 374 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
374 (6 August 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
1,542,066
Reactions total
49,642
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23m 01s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49,642 reactions across 364 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
28,781
58.0%
👍
8,372
16.9%
❤
7,409
14.9%
👎
1,410
2.84%
💔
1,239
2.50%
🤬
1,083
2.18%
🔥
814
1.64%
😐
534
1.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 365 of the 374 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,642reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 374 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 374 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prsbad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 374 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
باز دیدم یه عده مستقیم یا غیرمستقیم دارن میگن چرا یهو همه دارید از دهقان میگید نکنه از مدیریت باج گرفتید راه خرید بازیکن بنجل رو صاف کنید
توجه شما رو به تعدادی از پستهای چنل در مورد بازیکنای جوون و مستعد لیگ، خیلی قبلتر از اینکه رسانه های گوگولی مورد پسند شما ازشون حتی حرفی زده باشن
تو چنل قبلی هم مطالب مشابهی در مورد همین مهدی محبی خودمون یا لیموچی وجود داشت که الان در دسترس نیست
واکنش هوادار نابغه به جذب این بازی…
📲 اپلیکیشن اندروید سایت ریتزوبت 🔥
🚀 وقتی شرط هاتون رو توی ریتزوبت ثبت کنین ، علاوه بر ضرایب بالا ، هفتگی با #کد های هدیه کسب درآمد میکنید 🤑
♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب با کریپتو
♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب ریالی در ریتزوبت
☝فاصله ی تو با پول دراوردن فقط یک کلیک
🔺فقط فوتبال تماشا نکن از پبشبینی فوتبال پول در بیار چطوری ⁉️ بیا تا بهت بگم
⚡️ پلتفرم جهانی ریتزوبت به کاربران فارسی زبان خودش 100% هدیه شارژ اولیه میده
🔺 یعنی اگه 1.000.000 داشته باشی 1.000.000 هم ریتزوبت بهت میده
☑️ این یه بیزنس بین المللی و جهانی شرط بندی اما در محیط امن و سالم
🚀 همین حالا ثبتنام کن و تجربهای متفاوت از شرطبندی آنلاین رو شروع کن.
📲اپلیکیشن موبایل بر…
در آخر دوستان عزیز قربانی و دهقان دو بازیکن تو یه پست و تفاوت های بسیارند
اگه میشد جفتشونم باهم گرفت(حتی اون سومیم خوبه ها) نباید دریغ کرد از این کار
به نظر منم اولویت باید با قربانی باشه ولی دقت داشته باشید که ممکنه طبق گفته همون مدیرعامل تراکتور واقعا این باشگاه نخواد الان بفروشتش و نباید دستمونو تو پوست گردو بذاریم
@PrsBad | پرسپوليس بد
هرچی میخواید بیاید این زیر فحش بدید خودتونو خالی کنید
ولی هواداری که از خودش عقل نداره و مغزش وابسته شده به هشتگ و ترنسفرمارکت و این چنل و اون رسانه نه لیاقت جوونگرایی داره نه حتی لیاقت اینکه تیمش نتیجه بگیره
آخرین شاهکاری که با هشتگاتون رقم زدید یه پیرمرد بدردنخور رو توی تیم نگه داشت و هاشمیان رو کرد مربی
یه کسشریام یاد گرفتید هی میگید مطالبه مطالبه
فقط جلو پای خودتونو میبینید کافیه یه نفر بگه فلان جا رو اشتباه رفت…
اگه منفعل نیستید و به صحبت بقیه چنلا تصمیم به بنجل دونستن کسی و خدا کردن یکی دیگه ندارید این هایلایت مبین دهقان رو ببینید
اطلاعات بیشتر: مبین دهقان تو آکادمی پرسپولیس رشد کرد، به تیم بزرگسالان اومد ولی یحیی نخواستش، به پیکان رفت و بعد هم خیبر که بازی های خیلی خوبیم اونجا انجام داد
بعد از اینکه مشخص شد استعداد خوبی داره تراکتور پیشنهاد تپلی بهش داد ولی ترجیح داد بره امارات
در تمام این مدت این بازیکن ۲۰ ساله توی تیم …
احمقا یبار برای همیشه، سرمربی تیم اگه بازیکنی رو بخواد به مدیرعامل میگه برای جذبش اقدام شه و اگر نخواد هم درخواستی نمیده
هشتگای احمقانه شما نه فشاری برای جذب کسیه نه کنسل کردن کسی
@PrsBad | پرسپوليس بد
اون چوب مبارکی که از صبح بعد قرعهکشی نخبگان کردید تو کون خلق الله و دنبال مقصر واسه جاموندن دوبارمون از این تورنومنت میگردین رو آروم بزارید زمین و بشینید فکر کنید تو سه سال گذشته تو این باشگاه و فضای هواداری از چه گوساله هایی حمایت شد و به چه اشخاص سخیفی بها داده شد.
همیشه سوزن اول رو به خودتون بزنید عزیزای دلم.
@PrsBad | پرسپوليس بد
کارنامه رامین از نظر فوتبالی مخصوصا تو فوتبال ملی واقعا درحدی قویه که شما در یک حالت ایده ال باید منتظر باشی ۲۰ سال دیگه تو این کشور اتوبان بزنن به نامش.
تاثیرگذار ترین بازیکن ایران در ادوار جام و جهانی و کلی رکورد دیگه همه نشون دهنده توان فنی دفاع راستیه که هر بازی تو حمله « خطر » بود. منتهی رفتار و شخصیت خودش درکنار وضعیت اجتماعی و سیاسی ایران در این سالهای اخیر باعث شده که فقط فقط ازش به عنوان سوژه خنده یاد بشه و …
❤119👍47👎23🤣5
Signed Ariya
Showing the 12 most recent of 374 posts we hold for @prsbad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 637,000 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🚩 Tab Sorkh | تب سرخ ️ @TabSorkh · 94,103 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
آداک | ADAK @ADAK_IR_official · 117,625 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
🚩 ارتش سرخ ایران 🚩 @REDARMY_IR · 148,209 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
کانال رسمی باشگاه پرسپولیس @fcpersepolis_club · 204,971 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
توتال فوتبال @total_fut · 145,658 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
کانال هواداران سپاهان @Sepahan_1953 · 106,551 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
اخبار و خبر ورزشی فوتبال سه @varzesh_3i · 173,645 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پرسپولیس بد | Perspolis Bad” (@prsbad), 24,724 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prsbad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
