👆هوشداری بۆ باوک ودایکە بەڕێزەکان ⛔️کاتێک مناڵەکەتان بیانووی ئاو میوەی پاکتی ئەگرێت تکایە بۆی مەکڕن و ببینین لە چی دروست دەکرێت
😱9😢1😭1

Channel
@prsaosarakhoshiakan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
49,518subscribers
+819 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001108986128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prsaosarakhoshiakan |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prsaosarakhoshiakan |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 11:17 | 49,518 | -12 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:09 | 49,530 | +30 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:07 | 49,500 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:21 | 49,502 | +11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:37 | 49,491 | +3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:20 | 49,488 | +2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:19 | 49,486 | +11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:59 | 49,475 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 49,478 | +3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:06 | 49,475 | +5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 49,470 | +25 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 49,445 | +8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:59 | 49,437 | +19 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 49,418 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 49,416 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 49,418 | +17 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 49,401 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 49,403 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 49,406 | +13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 49,393 | first reading |
998 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 243 of 303 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 998 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,881,070 |
| Reactions total | 8,031 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 09:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 105 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23,714 reactions across 753 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 10,990 | 46.3% | |
| 😢 | 10,490 | 44.2% | |
| 😱 | 2,234 | 9.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 781 of the 998 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,056 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 998 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 75 of 306 posts held from the last 30 days (24.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👆هوشداری بۆ باوک ودایکە بەڕێزەکان ⛔️کاتێک مناڵەکەتان بیانووی ئاو میوەی پاکتی ئەگرێت تکایە بۆی مەکڕن و ببینین لە چی دروست دەکرێت
😱9😢1😭1
Photo, posted without a caption
😭19😢5😱1
🕋 ( إِنَّا لِلَّٰهِ وَإِنَّا إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعُونَ) 🕋 لەگەڵ ڕازی بوونمان بەقەدری خوای گەورە ئاگادارتان دەکەینەوە لە کۆچی دوایی خوشکی ئازیزمان: خوالێخۆشبو خوشکە فرشته رشیدزاده کچی بەڕێزان: خوالێخوشبو کاک محمد امین و خوشکه فاطمه ساوان. خێزانی کاک احمد گردنه بنه خوی و دایکی بەڕێزان: وریاو ئه هۆه ندوخوشکه هونیاگردنه و و خوشکی بەڕێزان: کاک محمد،کاک احمد ،کاک فریدون،خوشکە نسرین،خوشکە کلثوم،خوشکە رقیه ،خوشکە سحر،خوشک…
👆👆ئیمانداران و موسولمانان تکایه ئەم خوشکە بەڕێزەمان لە دۆعای بەخێری خۆان بێبەش مەکەن کە ئەمرۆ لە تاران نەشتەرگەری بۆ دەکرێت.خوای گەورە ڕەحمی پێی بکات وهەر چی زودتر شەفا پەیا بکات. ئامین
😢16
ئەگەر دڵت ڕەق بووە، بترسە! ئەگەر ئایەتێکی قورئان دەبیستیت و دڵت هیچ هەستێک ناکات، ئەگەر گوناهێک دەکەیت و پەشیمان نابیتەوە، ئەگەر ئازاری کەسێک دەبینیت و دڵت ناجوڵێت… کەمێک بوەستە و لە خۆت بپرسە: چی بەسەر دڵمدا هاتووە؟ دڵیش وەک جەستە پێویستی بە چاودێری هەیە. گوناه و بێئاگایی دەتوانن دڵ تاریک بکەن. پێش ئەوەی دڵت بە تەواوی لە ڕووناکی دوور بکەوێتەوە، بە قورئان و زیکر و تۆبە زیندووی بکەرەوە.
😢28
پرسە وسەرەخۆشییەکانی بانە pinned a photo
آکادمی تیزهوشان گلی برگزار میکند 📚✨ ✅ ثبتنام دوره جدید کلاسهای آمادگی برای آزمون تیزهوشان ویژهی دانشآموزان پایه پنجم 🎓 ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ ما در این دوره با توجه به نیاز شما عزیزان، کاملترین دوره آموزشی ویژهی آزمون تیزهوشان را طراحی کردهایم. 🧩 ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ جزئیات دورهی آموزشی تیزهوشان 1405: 🔸 کل محتوای تیزهوشان در سطح مقدماتی در یک ترم آموزش داده میشود. 🔸 یک ترم شامل 30 جلسه است. 🔸 دو روز در هفته کلاس برگ…
😱5
بەدواداچوونی دۆخی دایکی ١٠٠ ساڵە و کوڕەکەی لەلایەن بەرپرسان و دامەزراوە پەیوەندیدارەکانەوە دوای بڵاوکردنەوەی هەواڵی بارودۆخی ژیانی ئەم دایکە تەمەن ١٠٠ ساڵە و کوڕەکەی کە لە ناو کەپەرێکی پلاستیکی لە چوارڕێی تەرخان ئاوادی شاری بانەدا دەژیان، بەرپرسان و دامەزراوە پەیوەندیدارەکان بە خێرایی بەدواداچوونی کێشەکەیان کرد و هەنگاوی کردەییان بۆ چارەسەرکردنی بارودۆخی ئەم دوو کەسە هەڵگرت. لەوەدا پێویستە بە ڕێز و پێزانینەوە سوپاس…
😱29😢9😭3
بۆ ئاگاداری هاوڵاتیانی خۆشەویستی بانه!!! دوای بڵاوکردنەوەی هەواڵێک سەبارەت بە نیشتەجێبوونی خاتونێکی تەمەن ١٠٠ ساڵ لەگەڵ کوڕەکەی لە کەپەرێکی پلاستیکی لە چوارڕێی تەڕخان ئاوا بە خێرایی شارەوانی بانه، بەڕێز خاتوو سەروە قادرخانزادە، و بەڕێوەبەری بەڕێزی دایرە بەهزیستی بانه، کاک ناصر شهیدی، پەیوەندییان پێوە گرتین و بەدواداچوونیان بۆ ئەم بابەتە کرد. جێی باسە کە پێشتر هەوڵیان داوە ئەم دایکە و کوڕەکەی لە شوێنێکی ئارامتر و گو…
😭31😢9
🚨 درخواست فوری برای نجات جان یک مادر ۱۰۰ ساله و پسرش در چهارراه ترخانآباد 😳یک مادر سالخورده ۱۰۰ ساله به همراه پسرش در یک آلونک پلاستیکی در چهارراه ترخانآباد زندگی میکنند؛ بدون سرپناه مناسب، بدون امکانات اولیه و حتی بدون هیچ وسیله گرمایشی! در این روزهای سرد سال، این مادر و پسر در شرایطی بسیار دشوار و نگرانکننده به سر میبرند. با توجه به پیشبینی شروع برف و یخبندان در روزهای آینده، نگرانی جدی وجود دارد که سرمای ش…
😢153😭59😱17
👆جهت اطلاع مسئولان و ادارت مربوطه
😭33😱3
😳سەیر وسەمەر.... دو ڕۆژە ئاوی خواردنەوەی شاری بانە تەواو پیس و لێڵ بووە و ناتوانرێت بۆ خواردنەوە بەکاربهێنرێت؛ بەڵام بەداخەوە تا ئێستا هیچ ڕوونکردنەوە و زانیارییەکی ڕوون و فەرمی لەلایەن بەرپرسانی دایرەی پەیوەندیدارەوە بە خەڵک نەدراوە. 👈خەڵک مافی ئەوەیان هەیە بزانن هۆکاری ئەم دۆخە چییە و ئەم کێشەیە تا کەی بەردەوام دەبێت. بۆچی دەبێت هەمیشە چاوەڕێی دەربڕینی ناڕەزایەتی و دەنگی ناڕەزایی خەڵک بین، پاشان بەرپرسان دەست بە …
😱28😭11😢3
Showing the 12 most recent of 998 posts we hold for @prsaosarakhoshiakan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@prsaosarakhoshiakan edited 31 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 10 posts on @prsaosarakhoshiakan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظر شما در آگهیهای ترحیم چه اسامی از بستگان متوفی ذکر شود؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 998 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@prsaosarakhoshiakan named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پرسە وسەرەخۆشییەکانی بانە” (@prsaosarakhoshiakan), 49,518 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prsaosarakhoshiakan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.