目前 Bot 的 Widget Feature 已更新至 服务查看、工单查看、Emby 账号控制
👍3

Channel
@prprclouds
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,655subscribers
+90 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001452433390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prprclouds |
| Description | 交流群: @prprgroup 网站: prpr.96110.cn.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prprclouds |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 18:28 | 6,655 | +3 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 00:41 | 6,652 | +9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:40 | 6,643 | +1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:27 | 6,642 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:18 | 6,641 | +2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 6,639 | +4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:40 | 6,635 | +2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:58 | 6,633 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:28 | 6,632 | -9 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 6,641 | +3 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 6,638 | +2 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 6,636 | +5 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 6,631 | +9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 6,622 | +11 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 6,611 | +55 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 6,556 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 6,553 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 6,554 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 6,555 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 6,553 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (15 June 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 61,555 |
| Reactions total | 126 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
342 reactions across 33 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 64 | 18.7% | |
| 👏 | 41 | 12.0% | |
| 🤣 | 36 | 10.5% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 9.36% | |
| 😱 | 31 | 9.06% | |
| 🍾 | 27 | 7.89% | |
| 🌚 | 17 | 4.97% | |
| 💩 | 13 | 3.80% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 3.80% | |
| 🤬 | 12 | 3.51% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 2.92% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 2.05% | |
| 🤓 | 6 | 1.75% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 1.46% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 1.46% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.46% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.877% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.877% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 0.877% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.877% | |
| 3 further kinds | 6 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (45.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
目前 Bot 的 Widget Feature 已更新至 服务查看、工单查看、Emby 账号控制
👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🕊3
Photo, posted without a caption
Bot 已适配一些有点都没有用的功能
https://www.anthropic.com/claude-fable-and-mythos-5-2
YOQGYPF4/20261111/FLASH01 0.1折优惠码,仅限3次(已用完)
A\ 使用的 IP 段已新增 153.61.224.0/22 ,目前已更新规则,使用自定义规则的请尽快更新。
❤3
各补20份
❤2
双十一套餐已补货
目前有限度开放新用户注册,惟不保证新用户与即有用户之体验一致,请谨慎考虑注册和购买。
❤4
【prprCloud 双十一限定活动】 由即日起至 2026 年 11 月 11 日 23:59(北京时间),两款限定套餐开放购买: 2026 Double 11 Limited Access - Package A 188GB 流量/月 · 年付 CNY 111.1 2026 Double 11 Limited Access - Package B 88GB 流量/月 · 年付 CNY 88.88 常规套餐优惠码: • 续费:DPW7FOJF/20261111/15OFF • 新购:7ZPKZSKF/20261111/20OFF 后续可能还会有闪购,详情请留意频道公告。 注意事项 1. 所有优惠码仅限一次使用,不可叠加或循环使用 2. 上述优惠码及后续闪购码仅适用于常规套餐,不适用于限定套餐 3. 限定套餐不支持续费 4. 限定套餐购买后不支持更换 5. 使用续费优惠码后,后续续费金额将按套餐正价重新计算
❤20
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @prprclouds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“prprCloud 公告板” (@prprclouds), 6,655 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prprclouds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.