Channel
ПРО ВОСКовые отливки
@provosk24
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,917subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002036149670 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @provosk24 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/provosk24 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 2,917 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:10 | 2,919 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 2,925 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 2,926 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 2,929 | -1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 2,930 | -1 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 07:41 | 2,931 | +3 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 2,928 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 2,930 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 2,931 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:27 | 2,930 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 2,930 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 2,932 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 2,929 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 2,930 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 2,931 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vse_o_magii · 20,298
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 September 2026
@vedmindnevnichok · 21,314
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 October 2026
@golunovachannel · 32,327
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
@runelor · 20,966
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
@extrafad · 50,097
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
@azapetr · 55,377
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@magiya_svechii · 32,905
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
@study_taro · 35,250
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
@SilaTarot · 18,718
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 October 2026
@tarotman · 19,939
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
@aydar_enteo · 26,096
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПРО ВОСКовые отливки” (@provosk24), 2,917 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/provosk24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.