9.04 Владислав Цой и Юлий Сугейко. "Кооперация и PRIZM"
🔥17👍6

Channel
@prosto_sdelay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,351subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001360727567 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prosto_sdelay |
| Created | 4 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prosto_sdelay |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 1,351 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 1,354 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 1,352 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 1,353 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 1,355 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 1,356 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 1,356 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
435 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 187 | 43.0% | |
| 👍 | 95 | 21.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 65 | 14.9% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 5.52% | |
| ⚡ | 21 | 4.83% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 4.14% | |
| 🤝 | 15 | 3.45% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 1.15% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 435reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prosto_sdelay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 December 2025 to 9 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
9.04 Владислав Цой и Юлий Сугейко. "Кооперация и PRIZM"
🔥17👍6
"🤝Кооперация и PRIZM😊" - Владислав Цой и Юлий Сугейко. 📣 Приглашаю всех, кого волнует судьба криптовалюты PRIZM на Эфир с Владиславом в ТГ канале "ПРИЗМАЧ"! 🗓 9 апреля, четверг в 20-00мск. ✍️ Обсудим важные вопросы, касающиеся объединения, кооперации и конечно - Родового Капитала (куда без него)!
🔥18👍8❤🔥5⚡2👏1
📣Цифровая овца… Или? Долго ли мы будем наблюдать за тем, как из крипты создают финансовый контроль иного уровня? Децентрализация, одноранговость и сообщество - три несущих кита настоящей крипты. Напоминайте себе об этом перед тем как определять базовый актив своих предпочтений! #крипта #основа
🔥13👏5👍4🤯2
🔴Внезапное Отрезвление? Вообще то нет… Просто сейчас уже создана техническая возможность координировано отслеживать переводы между физиками Логичное продолжение налоговых реформ: ужесточение контроля и пресечение ухода в «переводы между физиками» Мелкий бизнес давно практикует «переведи на карту, брат». Раньше было: словил блокировку по 115ФЗ, закрыл карту и забрал деньги. Открыл карту в другом банке. Делов то… …
⚡2🔥2
С новым гоооооддоооооммм 🎄 урааааа 🎉🎉🎉🎉
🔥32👏15👍7
🎄Как ни крути, но этот год был особенным. Были и потери, но были и приобретения. Самое главное, что сформировалась осязаемая форма и платформа для развития! Инсайд этого года: Свети! Как никогда! Чем сильнее Светишь, тем дальше разбегаются «тараканы» 🤣 да шучу, на них вообще пофиг)) Чем сильнее светишь, тем дальше и чётко видишь путь к своей цели, тем больше тебя видят «свои» люди! 2026й год - это год Проявленнос…
❤🔥23👍5🙏4
🟢Новый год - Новые мысли - Новые смыслы! Год выдался, мягко говоря, непростым. Пока все бегали за иксами, система закручивала гайки. Если вы пользуетесь криптой, то наверняка чувствовали этот «холодок» от банков Мы записали этот подкаст как финальный аккорд года, чтобы дать вам пищу для размышлений. Я искренне считаю, что сейчас — время менять подход. Пора смотреть на крипту не как на способ быстро заработать, а к…
🔥15❤🔥2👍2🤣2
❤️Волшебная сегодня ночь будет Всех празднующих, С РОЖДЕСТВОМ ❤️
🔥15❤🔥1
✔️Ну что ж, друзья! Приоткрываю немного завесу тайны той идеи, которая очень давно вызревала в моих мыслях, действиях и словах! Мысли рождают слова, слова - действия, а действия - судьбу! Я шёл к этому с 2019 года. Путь был "увлекательным", я пробовал разные алгоритмы и каждый раз натыкался на "растворение иллюзий"! Однако, я каждый раз вставал, пересобирался, коректировался и продолжал свой ПУТЬ! Сформировалась…
🔥15❤🔥5👍3🤣2😁1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥28👍15👏3🤣2⚡1
Малость отвлечёмся… тут такая мысль 💭 осенила: Вам не кажется, что НДС реформа это и есть срез тех «больших» % на депозиты? 🤣 Только вот, депозитили те, у кого есть что депозитить, а % за расходы берут со всех 🤣 Ну так себе….игра 🤣 #ндс #бизнес #вашимимолитвами
🤣6
✅Благодарю каждого кто откликнулся. Нас не много, но мы ЕСТЬ. Да и наивно было бы ожидать высокого отклика на высокоморальные смыслы. Сбор завершится 20.12.2025. К тому моменту, каждому кто написал - будет направлена ссылка на закрытый чат 💭 Там мы с вами синхронизируемся по видению, по плану действий и вы увидите ЧТО УЖЕ СОЗДАНО КОМАНДОЙ. Сейчас время для формирования вектора развития, закладка фундаментальных …
👍17⚡6🤣3🤝2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prosto_sdelay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Опрос для держателей 😊: Какой ты игрок? (Выбери что к тебе подходит) 👇
The shares total 187%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 9 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 440,325 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@prosto_sdelay named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🟣Просто СДЕЛАЙ💯 Владислав Цой” (@prosto_sdelay), 1,351 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prosto_sdelay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.