National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,810–6,872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 00:39
6,829
-8
5 Nov 2026, 13:59
6,837
+2
2 Nov 2026, 04:08
6,835
-3
30 Oct 2026, 09:45
6,838
-1
27 Oct 2026, 16:50
6,839
+3
24 Oct 2026, 06:30
6,836
-4
20 Oct 2026, 22:31
6,840
-1
18 Oct 2026, 05:00
6,841
-5
15 Oct 2026, 02:21
6,846
-2
12 Oct 2026, 04:41
6,848
-10
5 Oct 2026, 02:16
6,858
+4
26 Sept 2026, 05:16
6,854
+4
17 Sept 2026, 12:58
6,850
-4
13 Sept 2026, 07:17
6,854
+1
9 Sept 2026, 12:36
6,853
-3
4 Sept 2026, 12:41
6,856
-6
31 Aug 2026, 19:17
6,862
-3
28 Aug 2026, 11:25
6,865
+8
25 Aug 2026, 19:33
6,857
+19
22 Aug 2026, 14:39
6,838
first reading
Engagement
103 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.36%
avg views ÷ 6,829 subscribers
Avg views / post
229
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 103 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
103 (4 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
10,084
Reactions total
130
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7
Links
≈2,280
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
268 reactions across 73 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
132
49.3%
❤
60
22.4%
✍
19
7.09%
😱
10
3.73%
🔥
9
3.36%
👀
8
2.99%
👎
6
2.24%
🤯
5
1.87%
🤡
4
1.49%
💯
3
1.12%
🤔
3
1.12%
🎃
2
0.746%
👻
2
0.746%
🖕
2
0.746%
👏
1
0.373%
🤨
1
0.373%
🤬
1
0.373%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Сколько хранить чеки и квитанции за ЖКХ, чтобы не пришлось платить повторно
Многие оплачивают коммунальные услуги и почти сразу выбрасывают квитанции или чеки. Кажется, что раз деньги внесены, то и переживать больше не о чем. Но на практике отсутствие подтверждающих документов иногда приводит к неприятным последствиям.
Расскажу показательный случай из судебной практики. Ко мне обратился собственник квартиры, с кото…
Не все знают, что закон предусматривает несколько оснований для получения денежной компенсации за ремонт своего жилья:
1) члены семей (вдовы, дети до 23 лет, если обучаются по очной форме, и пр. иждивенцы) военнослужащих, сотрудников ОВД, ФСИН, таможенных органов, которых не стало (в ходе исполнения служебных обязанностей или после 20-летней службы в органах), раз в 10 лет могут получить выплату на ремонт своего жил…
Автосалоны очень часто грешат навязыванием дополнительных платных услуг своим покупателям.
Но грамотные покупатели себя в обиду не дают — очередной пример, как нужно поступать:
- гражданин купил в салоне новый автомобиль в кредит.
Оформляя покупку, менеджеры автосалона убедили его подписать также дополнительный договор — на услугу «Автопомощник», которая обошлась покупателю еще в 192 тыс. рублей.
Эти деньги благо…
Показательный пример для тех, кто живет на работе и искренне уверен, что работодатель это обязательно оценит:
- юрисконсульта организации уволили за прогул.
В ответ он подал иск о взыскании с работодателя задолженности за те многочисленные часы, когда работал сверхурочно, а также в выходные и праздничные дни.
Однако в трех инстанциях суды отказали юристу, указав, что:
- истец не доказал, что его привлекали к рабо…
Вправе ли работодатель устанавливать «плавающие» даты выплаты заработной платы?
В последнее время всё чаще среди работодателей встречается такое ноу-хау, как установление плавающих дат выплаты заработной платы. Вместо привычных 15 и 30 числа расчётного месяца или 10 и 25 числа работодатели указывают в трудовых договорах «от 10 до 15 числа» и от «25 до 30 числа».
Насколько такая практика законна? Давайте попробуем р…
Лай собак в квартире в ночное время не предусмотрен большинством региональных законов в числе действий, нарушающих тишину и покой граждан в месте их жительства.
Но в судебной практике появился пример, который может обнадежить людей, страдающих от громких соседских собак:
- после нескольких жалоб от соседей жительницу многоквартирного дома, любительницу собак, оштрафовали за то, что собачий лай по ночам мешал всем с…
Куда жаловаться, если коммунальная организация нарушает правила начисления платы за ЖКУ, предоставляет некачественные коммунальные услуги или необоснованно ограничивает граждан в получении ЖКУ?
В первую очередь — в жилищную инспекцию, т. к. именно эта организация наделена полномочиями по осуществлению государственного жилищного надзора на территории Российской Федерации (ПП РФ от 30 сентября 2021 г. N 1670).
Жилинс…
Три ошибки в трудовой книжке, которые потом скажутся на вашей пенсии не лучшим образом:
- Ошибка на первой странице — Ф.И.О., дата рождения.
Одна неверная буква или цифра приводит к тому, что трудовая книжка признается чужой и не может подтвердить ваш стаж;
- Исправления.
В трудовой книжке нельзя зачеркивать записи о работе.
Если нужно исправить, вносится новая запись, а прежняя признается недействительной;
- О…
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @prosto_o_slochnom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 17 posts on @prosto_o_slochnom as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
9
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Юридические Тонкости @sivakovairina · 109,170 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Просто о сложном” (@prosto_o_slochnom), 6,829 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prosto_o_slochnom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.